Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    When you see the way the Pacers manhandle the HEAT at times it makes me upset that Ainge/Doc decided to fall for the small ball theory instead of staying big.

    When Ainge made the trade of Perk for Green the decision was made that it was better to play small to compete with Miami. Really what should've happened was they stay big with Perk, Shaq, JON and pound the HEAT.

    It hasn't worked for us...yes Green is nice but we had the same type of frontline as the Pacers have now but we went away from it.

    Bird saw something that Ainge never saw. Bird stayed with a conventional old school lineup and now it's paying off. Ainge panicked!

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from GregCelts. Show GregCelts's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    With Danny Grainger, Indiana used to have the option to go small with him at the 4 spot.  They don`t have that luxury anymore, otherwise they would switch things up like everybody else in the league.

    The Celtics are not a good rebounding team and going small makes things worse.  I hate when the Celts go small for long period of times, but it has its benefits when it`s free-throw time.  You don`t want Shaq or Perk at the line.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    clearly, we would have had much more scoring the past two years with perk in the middle. ;)

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Number6Fan. Show Number6Fan's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    We wouldn't have had Perk for the last two years -- he was a FA and he was asking for more money to resign than we would have been willing to pay.  Green in trade (esp. when we had no sub for PP) was muchy better than losing him for zip.  Can we get off this topic now?

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BiggerThanMyBrady. Show BiggerThanMyBrady's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Hold on, are we really wishing the Celtics didn't have Jeff Green right now? I don't know what you guys are seeing but Jeff Green is turning into quite the well-rounded basketball player and Kendrick Perkins can't get any PT (Collison has really taken his spot in every big playoff game). It's great to talk about all the hypotheticals of what COULD have happened if they had Perk, but they don't. They have Green, who in the right mindset dropped 43 against the Heat and can man-up LeBron about as good as anyone could do it. I thought at the time it was a weird trade, but c'mon guys. You can't be serious about the results now.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from DaCeltics. Show DaCeltics's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    You can argue that we were better with Perk and Nate, than Green and Fat Jelo.

    There are other wing defenders available that can knock down threes that didn't cost as much as Jeff. Pietrus, Matt Barnes, Danny Green.

    Whatever happened to that SF leaper Toronto had? Forgot his name. Went to Cleveland maybe? 

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from DaCeltics. Show DaCeltics's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Jamario Moon! Where is he now?

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BiggerThanMyBrady. Show BiggerThanMyBrady's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Nate is the ringleader of the irrational confidence guys (JR Smith is second in command). He also doesn't play defense. I think you're forgetting that Perk can't score. He doesn't have anything close to the offensive game that Hibbert has. That's why Indiana has a chance. It's not just the rebounding and the defense. They can kick it into the low post to either West or Hibbert and have a good chance of scoring.

    In terms of wing players, yeah Danny Green would be nice. But San Antonio knows what they have with him and he seems to enjoy it there. Pietrus doesn't have any knees left and Matt Barnes is streaky.

    I'd rather ride with Jeff Green (who had an outstanding finish from about February on) than any of those guys. He's making 9 mil right now and has shown the ability to get it done. He can attack the basket, shoot from all over the floor, and plays good defense. My only knocks on him are he isn't aggressive enough and he doesn't rebound all too well for a guy that size. That's where Sully comes in, who's an above average rebounder for a guy his size.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from SFBostonFan. Show SFBostonFan's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    I agree with BiggerThanMyBrady's post above !

     

    I believe we would have won vs Lakers in 2010 had Perk not gone down in game 6. And maybe too we'd won in 2011 with Perk.  But, he really is a muscle man who could defend biggies, Bynum, Gasol, Howard etc. and as Cs had a younger KG and Sheed, he wasn't needed to score. With OKC and Durant, Westbook and they had Harden too, he wasn't obtained for scoring. But, if available now, I'd pass as he's single digit scoring, rebounding & still can't make foul shots. KG is older so we really need a Hibbert type who can give us 20 pts/10 rebs and, yup, Perk would be fine in addition to a prolific center but not at the salary he would want.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Perk is and was always awful.  Could he have kept Rondo inspired in 2011 is anybody's guess.  All the moves Danny was kept from were his fault.  He came up with very little in what could have kept the title chances alive.  Tony Allen jumps out as one of his most preventable mistakes.  DA made it all happen in 2007 and that cannot be ignored.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    It's not just Perk i'm talking about. i'm talking about the philosophy to go small when the HEAT signed the Big 3. This incompasses signing Bass and not trying to keep guys like Perk, Steemer, Hollins. We kept getting rid of every big man we had in order to play small ball.

    We were on the right track. We had Perk and Nate and all of a sudden we took this U turn and changed the entire philosphy and make up of the team to try to match up with the HEAT. We shouldn't have allowed them to dictate how the C's were built. The formula was working but Ainge tends to tinker too much.

    Ok, if we had one signing/trade to buy back or sell again who would it be?? Is it TA, Posey, Perk, Shaq, Steemer, Bass, Green, RA... I would take Perk back because it would've kept KG at PF.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    In response to Number6Fan's comment:

     

    We wouldn't have had Perk for the last two years -- he was a FA and he was asking for more money to resign than we would have been willing to pay.  Green in trade (esp. when we had no sub for PP) was muchy better than losing him for zip.  Can we get off this topic now?

     



    Perk's free ageny cost was the same money we paid Green... so basically the hypothetical is had the C's OVERPAID for Perk would they have been a better team

     



    I say yes because we wouldn't have lost a year of Perk like we did Green with heart surgery. We would've had Perk and Steemer.

    Keep in mind we not only lost Green but wes lost Wilcox too...but had we not lost Wilcox we probably wouldn't have signed Steemer or Hollins. Oh it's so nice to look back with 20/20 vision.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BiggerThanMyBrady. Show BiggerThanMyBrady's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In order to "go big" you have to have a big that can score. Like DeMarcus, Hibbert, Gasol. Again, rebounding is great, but if you can't go into the low post and score then going big doesn't really matter. Tyson Chandler, great rim protector, great pick and roll player, zero low post offensive game. So would the Knicks beat the Heat? No. Why? Cause they can't score in the low post. The Heat close out on shooters better than any team in the NBA (just ask Steve Novak). So those three's the Knicks usually hit probably wouldn't fall as much. Perk doesn't score in the low post off anything other than a tip in. KG can score down there every once in a while, but he's more of a stretch 4, which helps with spacing.

    Going big is a great idea, but the Pacers have the guys to really execute that. Hibbert, West, Mahimi (a little bit) is a great rotation of guys. Plus they have George and Stephenson to bug LeBron and Wade. George Hill is a great distributor and can get into the lane to collapse the D.

    That being said give me Jeff Green over all those guys not named Tony Allen. Tony is a defensive specialist, but with him, Bradley, Lee, and Green I'd like to see someone score not in the low-post.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Jefflippa. Show Jefflippa's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Dear Lord, send us a true old fashioned low post center.

    Is Bynum worth a shot?

     

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from susan250. Show susan250's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to Jefflippa's comment:

    Dear Lord, send us a true old fashioned low post center.

    Is Bynum worth a shot?

     


    It all depends on what type of contract he gets.  Any team is taking a big risk if you have to sign him for a significant amount of money.   He hasn't had many productive seasons and I don't believe next season will be any different. 

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from BiggerThanMyBrady. Show BiggerThanMyBrady's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    Hey! Someone gets it! Give me Jeff Green over Battier though. He's been really bad so far in the postseason (23% from the field, 23% from 3). A guy that shoots that bad with DWade and LeBron on the floor at the same time doesn't do much for you. He has one spot on the floor he's really solid from (the off-center three) and isn't bad from either corner. But he's really only been good at flopping so far. Again.....of those four mentioned I don't see how anyone wants anyone BUT Jeff Green. He's 26 (youngest of the bunch), averaged 20 points per in the playoffs (albeit 6 games - SSS), and shoots 44% from the field and 45% from 3. Hello? You wanna replace that guy? With Gerald Wallace/Battier and Perkins? How does that make you better?

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to concord27's comment:

    Perk is and was always awful.  Could he have kept Rondo inspired in 2011 is anybody's guess.  All the moves Danny was kept from were his fault.  He came up with very little in what could have kept the title chances alive.  Tony Allen jumps out as one of his most preventable mistakes.  DA made it all happen in 2007 and that cannot be ignored.

    +1


     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from DoctorCO. Show DoctorCO's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    WOW!!!!!!

    Stop the PERK WAS THE ANSWER MADNESS...

    PERK WAS PERK IN 2008.....

    PERK WAS A SHELL OF HIMSELF IN 2011

    HE HAS A BAD ATTITUDE (ALL OF THOSE T FOULS HE GETS)

    HE CANT SCORE, CAN BAIRLY REBOUND..

    AND TO SAY WE SHOULDNT HAVE GOT GREEN..

    IF JEFF GREEN WASNT ON THE CELTICS..THE CELTICS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE LOTERY..AND IF PERK WAS WITH THE CS...THED HAVE A GOOD D..BUT WOULD ONLY SCORE 70 POINTS A GAME...WITH PERK AN AVG CELTICS GAME WOULD BE..MIAMI 89 BOSTON 62...

     

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    I hated the Perk trade but this is a weak argument you have posted here. 

    "Really what should've happened was they stay big with Perk, Shaq, JON and pound the HEAT."

    The reason they traded Perk was because of JON and Shaq. But those two old stiffs couldn't stay on the floor. 

    Perk would have limited effectiveness against the Heat, as there is no one for him to guard and he has iron hands around the basket.

    What you are overlooking is that Hibbert's main impact is offensive, we didn't have a young 7 foot four offensive big man - nobody does except for them. 

    The Heat can absolutely be beaten without a big man. But yeah, if you have a big man that can score and also play some D, it will help your chances. Those guys are hard to come by and we never had anyone like that on our roster. 

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from jrmccook. Show jrmccook's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to Jefflippa's comment:

    Dear Lord, send us a true old fashioned low post center.

    Is Bynum worth a shot?

     

    We all know Greg Oden is made of glass.. Bynum is ceramic on the outside, doughnuts on the inside.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to jfaust1954's comment:

    In response to BirdLewsBias' comment:

     

    When you see the way the Pacers manhandle the HEAT at times it makes me upset that Ainge/Doc decided to fall for the small ball theory instead of staying big.

    When Ainge made the trade of Perk for Green the decision was made that it was better to play small to compete with Miami. Really what should've happened was they stay big with Perk, Shaq, JON and pound the HEAT.

    It hasn't worked for us...yes Green is nice but we had the same type of frontline as the Pacers have now but we went away from it.

    Bird saw something that Ainge never saw. Bird stayed with a conventional old school lineup and now it's paying off. Ainge panicked!

     

     



     

     

    Danny Strange screwed the pooch when he traded Perk...they haven't been able to play inside since..they could have won 2 more championships if he was there...Green?...are you kidding me? Every 3rd game he decides he's going to attack the basket...he's NOT a PTP.



    Perkins stinks ask the Thunder.  Two more titles maybe with Tony Allen and the addition of another healthy skilled big man to play alongside KG.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Karllost. Show Karllost's posts

    Re: Miscalculation by Ainge & Doc

    In response to DoctorCO's comment:

    WOW!!!!!!

    Stop the PERK WAS THE ANSWER MADNESS...

    PERK WAS PERK IN 2008.....

    PERK WAS A SHELL OF HIMSELF IN 2011

    HE HAS A BAD ATTITUDE (ALL OF THOSE T FOULS HE GETS)

    HE CANT SCORE, CAN BAIRLY REBOUND..

    AND TO SAY WE SHOULDNT HAVE GOT GREEN..

    IF JEFF GREEN WASNT ON THE CELTICS..THE CELTICS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN THE LOTERY..AND IF PERK WAS WITH THE CS...THED HAVE A GOOD D..BUT WOULD ONLY SCORE 70 POINTS A GAME...WITH PERK AN AVG CELTICS GAME WOULD BE..MIAMI 89 BOSTON 62...

     




    Yup... Perk is a total bust for OKC imo... One of the better trades DA made.... he was second guessed because Shaq went down for the count. The C's were doing great with Perk out due to injury, he wasnt needed. Now we can see he's gotten less and less effective to the point he appears virtually worthless on the court.

    On the other hand, Green has contributed much more to the C's and will continue to do so.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share