Nets vs Celtics 04/10/13

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Nets vs Celtics 04/10/13

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to ktronic's comment:

     

     

    Any examples?

     

     

    Lakers, Pistons, and Bulls.

    The Magic Johnson Lakers era ended in 1991. After losing to MJ in the Finals, Magic retired and the Lakers only went back to the Finals, led by Shaq, in 2000. So 1991 to 2000 is 9 years.

    Isiah Thomas last won a championship, with the Pistons, in 1990. The next time the Pistons made it to the Finals, led by Billups, was in 2004. That's 14 years from one Finals to the next.

    MJ's Bulls last made it to the Finals in 1998. And so far the Derrick Rose led Bulls haven't made it to the Finals yet. They came close in 2011 when they faced the Heat in the 2011 east finals.

     

    Superstars are hard to find. It took the Celts a decade to get Paul Pierce. Then it will take another 5-7 years for that superstar to be ready to compete for a championship.

    Like I said, history tells us it will take more or less 10 years.

     



    + 1  the Cs will be developing talent and rebuilding for a while. On the topic of rebuilding, I hope they select Giannis Adetukonbu in the upcoming draft! 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from KingShaq. Show KingShaq's posts

    Re: Nets vs Celtics 04/10/13

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

     

    Lakers, Pistons, and Bulls.

    The Magic Johnson Lakers era ended in 1991. After losing to MJ in the Finals, Magic retired and the Lakers only went back to the Finals, led by Shaq, in 2000. So 1991 to 2000 is 9 years.

    Isiah Thomas last won a championship, with the Pistons, in 1990. The next time the Pistons made it to the Finals, led by Billups, was in 2004. That's 14 years from one Finals to the next.

    MJ's Bulls last made it to the Finals in 1998. And so far the Derrick Rose led Bulls haven't made it to the Finals yet. They came close in 2011 when they faced the Heat in the 2011 east finals.

     

    Superstars are hard to find. It took the Celts a decade to get Paul Pierce. Then it will take another 5-7 years for that superstar to be ready to compete for a championship.

    Like I said, history tells us it will take more or less 10 years.

     

     



     

    Only if you mean "the history that suits my argument"... Otherwise, history is not your strong suit.


    Hondo Celtics 1976 ... Bird Celtics 1981

    Mikan Lakers 1954 ... Baylor Lakers 1959


    Unless there is an arithmetic system that 1981-1976 or 1959-1954 = (more or less) 10.


    But you can also try another argument: Jurassic age of the NBA doesn't count, and anything in the NBA before the Magic/Bird era was irrelevant. Then I am with you...

     

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from OneOnOne. Show OneOnOne's posts

    Re: Nets vs Celtics 04/10/13

    I guess you could also say the no rebounds no rings quote doesn't hold either. The Heat are the worst rebounding team in the league, under 40 per game,  and they are the odds on favorite to win the title.  History is set nearly every nite in some stat.  Somebody does something that has never happened before.  Only one teams wins a title every year so by odds you should only win a title every 20-30 years.  If you what you think is obviously going to happen, it normally doesn't happen.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share