Nets want Garnett

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Jefflippa. Show Jefflippa's posts

    Nets want Garnett

    RealGM says Nets are interested in Garnett and Garnett is interested in the Nets.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from MustangBri. Show MustangBri's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    For?

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from cabutan. Show cabutan's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    Betcha nets are willing to only offer marshon brooks.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from cabutan. Show cabutan's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    If its blatche, would any of you do it?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett


    KG would really go to the Nets and play for JKidd...wow!

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett


    Brook Lopez and that would be it. I wouldn't want Humphries or Wallace...overpaid.

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    Garnett and draft picks are what the Celtics want?

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    I hope Ainge wouldn't do it for Humphries...because that works straight up.

    Nets really don't have much that would be appealing in my eyes when I think Ainge could do better calling OKC. I would think KG would take OKC over the Nets.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett


    Humphries, Marshon and an unprotected 2014 pick is worth discussing

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BirdLewsBias. Show BirdLewsBias's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to BirdLewsBias' comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    I hope Ainge wouldn't do it for Humphries...because that works straight up.

    Nets really don't have much that would be appealing in my eyes when I think Ainge could do better calling OKC. I would think KG would take OKC over the Nets.

     



    OKC is the best destination for KG.

     

    Perkins, Lamb, and OKC's 12th pick in this year's draft for KG.

    OKC gets to dump Perk's salary.

    Celtics get a lottery pick and a young shooter in Lamb.

    Definitely OKC improves its chances of winning a championship with KG than Perk.

    [/QUOTE]


    Thats the deal to make

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from cole-ely. Show cole-ely's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    Kg too redundant with serg I'm thinking.  They need a low post scorer and banger, not another stretch 4/5.  

    Of course the nets want kg....they want anything they'd can get for humphries.  They'll be calling everybody dangling that guy.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from prakash. Show prakash's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to cole-ely's comment:

    Kg too redundant with serg I'm thinking.  They need a low post scorer and banger, not another stretch 4/5.  

    Of course the nets want kg....they want anything they'd can get for humphries.  They'll be calling everybody dangling that guy.




    No, KG is perfect for them.  His outside shooting will open up all kinds of lanes for Westbrook and Durant.  His production will be so much superior to Perk.  This will be a no-brainer trade for both the sides provide KG agrees to waive his no-trade.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from fbombfury. Show fbombfury's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to BirdLewsBias' comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    I hope Ainge wouldn't do it for Humphries...because that works straight up.

    Nets really don't have much that would be appealing in my eyes when I think Ainge could do better calling OKC. I would think KG would take OKC over the Nets.

     



    OKC is the best destination for KG.

     

    Perkins, Lamb, and OKC's 12th pick in this year's draft for KG.

    OKC gets to dump Perk's salary.

    Celtics get a lottery pick and a young shooter in Lamb.

    Definitely OKC improves its chances of winning a championship with KG than Perk.

    [/QUOTE]

    Hey tool, never happen!  Money Burnt

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from KennCelt53. Show KennCelt53's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to fbombfury's comment:

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    In response to BirdLewsBias' comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    I hope Ainge wouldn't do it for Humphries...because that works straight up.

    Nets really don't have much that would be appealing in my eyes when I think Ainge could do better calling OKC. I would think KG would take OKC over the Nets.

     

     



    OKC is the best destination for KG.

     

     

    Perkins, Lamb, and OKC's 12th pick in this year's draft for KG.

    OKC gets to dump Perk's salary.

    Celtics get a lottery pick and a young shooter in Lamb.

    Definitely OKC improves its chances of winning a championship with KG than Perk.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Hey tool, never happen!  Money Burnt

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Not unless they throw in Durant.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    Perk, Lamb, 12 pick 2013

    Brooks, Humphries, 2014 pick (unprotected)

    Biedrins, Green, 2014 pick

     

    That's three contenders and possible trades. I think I'd prefer something with GSW as they have more assets than Bkn or OKC.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from MrCricket. Show MrCricket's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    brooks, humphries, and a #1 pick makes sense.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from cole-ely. Show cole-ely's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    Maybe you guys think I'm crazy, but I think Jordan Crawford can give you the same things as brooks.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from Ortiz123. Show Ortiz123's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to R9R's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    Perk, Lamb, 12 pick 2013

    Brooks, Humphries, 2014 pick (unprotected)

    Biedrins, Green, 2014 pick

     

    That's three contenders and possible trades. I think I'd prefer something with GSW as they have more assets than Bkn or OKC.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     



    Jeremy Lamb and this year's 12th pick is more valuable than Draymond Green and the Warriors' pick in 2014. 

     

    Remember, the Warriors are a legit 50-win team now. Their 1st round pick in 2014 will most likely be in the mid-20s.

    [/QUOTE]


    Ilike the OKC deal, along with a first pick for PP, and we sign Smith, and with two picks this year, along with two more next year and we are in business!!!

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from teejaytee70. Show teejaytee70's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to BirdLewsBias' comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    I hope Ainge wouldn't do it for Humphries...because that works straight up.

    Nets really don't have much that would be appealing in my eyes when I think Ainge could do better calling OKC. I would think KG would take OKC over the Nets.

     



    OKC is the best destination for KG.

     

    Perkins, Lamb, and OKC's 12th pick in this year's draft for KG.

    OKC gets to dump Perk's salary.

    Celtics get a lottery pick and a young shooter in Lamb.

    Definitely OKC improves its chances of winning a championship with KG than Perk.

    [/QUOTE]

    That would be a great deal.  Perk only has a couple more years I believe on his contract.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Gasthoerer. Show Gasthoerer's posts

    Re: Nets want Garnett

    In response to Fierce34's comment:

    In response to cole-ely's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Maybe you guys think I'm crazy, but I think Jordan Crawford can give you the same things as brooks.



    Actually, you're not crazy for thinking that.

    [/QUOTE]

    If you thinking about bad decision making, horrible defense, and low percentage shooting, then yes, Crowford and Brooks both can provide that.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share