OKC would be an interesting trade partner

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    Agree -but I think they'll focus on replacing Martin at the end of the year.

    My 3 way trade is this:

     

    Pierce and Perk to Clips

    Butler to OKC

    Jordan and Bledsoe (swap picks?) to us

    KG to the Old folks home!

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    If I were OKC ... I'd amnesty Perk, let Martin walk. Go out and buy a 6th man (jj.redick, or monta ellis, Delfino, Robinson) and a back-up big (mohammed, blatche, dalembert, Collins) for vet min. I would also be interested in the Paul Pierce sweepstakes once we buy Paul out. I could see Paul as a great 6th man off the bench for OKC...

     

     

    But I also see KG to the Clippers for Jordan & Bledsoe (or picks); Buy-out PP under the implicit assumption that he will sign with LAC for a reasonable salary (like 4M, 1 year). That way KG and PP can make a run with CP3, Billups, Griffin, and Crawford. Amnesty Butler and get two better impact players for your bench. After they win a title (or fall short to MIA), Paul signs a 1 year VET min deal with BOS and retires a Celtic.

    EVERYONE WINS!

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    In response to R9R's comment:

    If I were OKC ... I'd amnesty Perk, let Martin walk. Go out and buy a 6th man (jj.redick, or monta ellis, Delfino, Robinson) and a back-up big (mohammed, blatche, dalembert, Collins) for vet min. I would also be interested in the Paul Pierce sweepstakes once we buy Paul out. I could see Paul as a great 6th man off the bench for OKC...

     

     

    But I also see KG to the Clippers for Jordan & Bledsoe (or picks); Buy-out PP under the implicit assumption that he will sign with LAC for a reasonable salary (like 4M, 1 year). That way KG and PP can make a run with CP3, Billups, Griffin, and Crawford. Amnesty Butler and get two better impact players for your bench. After they win a title (or fall short to MIA), Paul signs a 1 year VET min deal with BOS and retires a Celtic.

    EVERYONE WINS!




    Yes, good idea, except LAC already used their amnesty on Ryan Gomes.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from guyfromtex. Show guyfromtex's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    Trade with the same team that hid a heart-ailment of one of their players from the Celtics in exchange for Boston's starting center? Bad idea. I wouldn't trust those people for nothing.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from dirty52. Show dirty52's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    In response to R9R's comment:

    If I were OKC ... I'd amnesty Perk, let Martin walk. Go out and buy a 6th man (jj.redick, or monta ellis, Delfino, Robinson) and a back-up big (mohammed, blatche, dalembert, Collins) for vet min. I would also be interested in the Paul Pierce sweepstakes once we buy Paul out. I could see Paul as a great 6th man off the bench for OKC...

     

     

    But I also see KG to the Clippers for Jordan & Bledsoe (or picks); Buy-out PP under the implicit assumption that he will sign with LAC for a reasonable salary (like 4M, 1 year). That way KG and PP can make a run with CP3, Billups, Griffin, and Crawford. Amnesty Butler and get two better impact players for your bench. After they win a title (or fall short to MIA), Paul signs a 1 year VET min deal with BOS and retires a Celtic.

    EVERYONE WINS!




    The Clippers would then go from being lob city to geriatric  city

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from GAShamrock60. Show GAShamrock60's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    Having Perk and Rondo on the same team on offense would be a major liability. Neither can make FT and Perk can't create his own shot or even handle most passes. He is only a backup center at best and not worth 9 million a season. Without Garnett, Pierce or Ray we would be horrible on offense. 

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    They are a win-now team obviously, with 2 players we would likely be interested in (Perk and Lamb) and 2 picks in this years draft.

    Perhaps we could make moves to swap up or down with them from 16 to around 8 or down to 29?

    At 8 I'd want us to target Oladipo or Muhammad, would OKC go after one of those SG's? Theose two should ahve much more value than Lamb, is he expendable? What are they going to do with Kevin Martin? He's 31 but still worth more than just the MLE.

    Are they still terrified of paying the tax?

     

    I think most of us would prefer Perk at 8-9m to Bass at 6-7 million for the enxt two years. But in OKC's style of play clearly Collison and Ibaka are best at the 5 and Durant at the 4 for them over plodding Perkins. In 18-22 minutes here Perk would be the type of intimidating C the C's need to get more boards than Bass as Sully takes most of Bass's mins and KG's are reduced.




     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Red-16Russ-11. Show Red-16Russ-11's posts

    Re: OKC would be an interesting trade partner

    Of course, I would happily take PJ3 off their hands as well........LOL

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share