Parsons Available (RFA)?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Parsons Available (RFA)?

    Rockets Formally Inform Chandler Parsons Of Declined Team Option
    Jun 28, 2014 2:59 PM EDT

    The Houston Rockets have officially informed Chandler Parsons that they will decline his team option for next season, thus making him a restricted free agent.


    The Rockets have stated they hope to re-sign Parsons.


    Parsons would have been an unrestricted free agent in 2015 if the Rockets had picked up the option.


    Via Marc J. Spears/Yahoo! Sports
    Chandler Parsons, Houston Rockets, NBA, NBA Misc Rumor
    Read the Full StoryDiscussSend FeedbackBuy Tickets

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    I would love to see this guy in Green! 

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    Houston is the only place I hear where it is even possible Lebron and Carmelo could be together. They have made the cap space.  Parson won't be in their plans if that is the case.  Of course Lebron is staying in Miami. The odds are same for Love coming here.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    C. Parsons career averages - 16-pts, 4-assists, and 5.5-rebs per game! 

     

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    That's bad news for Celtic fans.

    Because he's a RFA.

    Meaning the Rockets can match any offers.

    So if the Rockets don't get Melo or Lebron, the Rockets will just re-sign Parsons.



    Timing is everything! If LJ and or Melo string their self-love tour out - AND - Houston tries to put Parsons on ice - He could simply say "see ya" 

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    In response to BCSP's comment:

     

     

    Timing is everything! If LJ and or Melo string their self-love tour out - AND - Houston tries to put Parsons on ice - He could simply say "see ya" 

     

     



    That would be true if Parsons is an UFA.

     

     

    But he's a RFA.

     

    Rockets can match any offers.



    Make him a quick offer on day 1 of FA period - Rockets won't be able to match -AND - make a run at LJ and Melo!

    Wow - I had no idea Parson was only making $950,000! Somebody is getting a raise!!

    Go get him Danny! 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    Besides, the Celts already offered AB the QO, so the Celts don't have cap space to make a significant offer for Parsons.



    DA would have to get creative - make some trades! 

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    Don't we already have a SF who is putting up nearly identical numbers? Parsons ain't putting us over the top. He a complimentary piece. We already have such pieces. What we lack is a star centerpiece. Acquiring a star (or trading away some of our older complimentary pieces) should be the focus at this point. 

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to kaktug's comment:

    Don't we already have a SF who is putting up nearly identical numbers? Parsons ain't putting us over the top. He a complimentary piece. We already have such pieces. What we lack is a star centerpiece. Acquiring a star (or trading away some of our older complimentary pieces) should be the focus at this point. 



    Big difference between Parsons and Green - Parsons brings it every night! 

    I am guessing almost any team out there would like to add a player like C. Parsons to their roster - Green not so much!

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?


    For what we would have to pay Parsons, i would just as soon stay with Green.  When Green brings his A game, he's a much better player than Parsons.  Yeah i know, he doesn't bring his A game enough, well maybe next season he will.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from JamezHill. Show JamezHill's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to kyceltic's comment:


    For what we would have to pay Parsons, i would just as soon stay with Green.  When Green brings his A game, he's a much better player than Parsons.  Yeah i know, he doesn't bring his A game enough, well maybe next season he will.



    agreed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from BCSP. Show BCSP's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    A future core of guys who are all currently under 25:

    Shooters:

    Parsons and Young - we'll assume 40% from 3. Both are average defenders but do offer great size for SG/SF positions at 6'7" and 6'8" (conservatively, Young is still growing and Chandler is listed at 6'9")

    Shot blocking rim defending athlete:

    Capela

    Unique offensive skill set high bball IQ guys:

    Sully and Olynyk

    Bulldog defenders of either guard position:

    Smart and Bradley

    Add in whatever top 5 pick we get next year and a top 10 pick the year after that and this team should be ready to explode on the league before the 2016-17 season. The summer before that they will also have TONS of cap space.

     

     



    I like that team!

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to kaktug's comment:

    Don't we already have a SF who is putting up nearly identical numbers? Parsons ain't putting us over the top. He a complimentary piece. We already have such pieces. What we lack is a star centerpiece. Acquiring a star (or trading away some of our older complimentary pieces) should be the focus at this point. 



    I agree with you, but they also need a rim protecting, rebounding "5" or they'll go absolutely nowhere.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to kyceltic's comment:


    For what we would have to pay Parsons, i would just as soon stay with Green.  When Green brings his A game, he's a much better player than Parsons.  Yeah i know, he doesn't bring his A game enough, well maybe next season he will.



    You know better than this! He's NEVER going to change, he's consistently inconsistent...he needs bipolar medication!

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Parsons Available (RFA)?

    In response to mellymel3's comment:

    In response to kyceltic's comment:


    For what we would have to pay Parsons, i would just as soon stay with Green.  When Green brings his A game, he's a much better player than Parsons.  Yeah i know, he doesn't bring his A game enough, well maybe next season he will.



    You know better than this! He's NEVER going to change, he's consistently inconsistent...he needs bipolar medication!

      You're probably right, but i was comparing him to Parsons. If Green was played for the Rockets last year he would have been the third best player on the team and would not have had to try and carry them. That would put him at his best. On the other hand if Parsons played for the Celtics last year and had to be the best player, he would have been way worse than Green in my opinion.


     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts