Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rebels345209. Show Rebels345209's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    They better start looking for a third team of they want Ray
     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    ray would make them a dangerous team.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]ray would make them a dangerous team.
    Posted by kaktug[/QUOTE]

    assuming he makes shots and doesn't fall into a shooting slump. let's not forget that we won our title with ray in the midst of a horrible shooting slump.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from breaktime. Show breaktime's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : If the Clips offer DeAndre Jordan then Ainge would definitely do the deal. This is Ainge's chance to correct his mistake by passing on Jordan in 2008. Ha Ha
    Posted by Fiercest34[/QUOTE]
    Like the new icon, Fiercest
    Allen for DeAndre?
    In a heartbeat.
    Really addresses what we're missing.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Elven 32. Show Elven 32's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    Clips don't need Ancient #2, they have enough talent to make a real shot at the championship without trading for a one dimensional player. Let Ray retire as a Celtic....

    let him Dannnnyyyy!
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rebels345209. Show Rebels345209's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    Clippers won't trade Jordan for Ray and JO's corpse
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from JamezHill24. Show JamezHill24's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : Like the new icon, Fiercest Allen for DeAndre? In a heartbeat. Really addresses what we're missing.
    Posted by breaktime[/QUOTE]


    i feel like they are more likely to offer Kenyon Martin. if we want DeAndre WE will have to add someone to the mix, hopefully someone like Stiemsma.
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    they won't offer their young center for an old ray allen. we could still deal with them, but atlanta is a tempting trade parter as well. josh smith would be a good add, as has been discussed in other threads.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rebels345209. Show Rebels345209's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In response to "Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray": [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : assuming he makes shots and doesn't fall into a shooting slump. let's not forget that we won our title with ray in the midst of a horrible shooting slump. Posted by kaktug[/QUOTE] Ray did get hot at a convenient time but he killed us round 2 vs Cavs. PJ, Pierce and KG won that series all and all. Add a few Rondo triples in game 5 (when he was an even worse shooter.... yuck!). I think going head to head with rival Rip Hamilton woke him up in the conference finals
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from concord27. Show concord27's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : i feel like they are more likely to offer Kenyon Martin. if we want DeAndre WE will have to add someone to the mix, hopefully someone like Stiemsma.
    Posted by JamezHill24[/QUOTE]
    Kenyon Martin for Ray Allen is a joke. Ainge would be crazy to take him.  He is barely 6-9.
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from arodrambone. Show arodrambone's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    Clippers are starting to falter. Let them falter, do not help them get better.

    They could have the 19th-20th pick if they continue to slide and lose faith. That's better than 25-28. Having two top 20 picks would be really nice for the Celtics.

    Let somebody else make the Clips better. Whatever benefit the C's receive will be offset by lower draft position.

    Danny Granger went one pick ahead of Gerald Green in the low teens. Draft position means as much as anything to the Celtics future.


     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rebels345209. Show Rebels345209's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In response to "Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray": [QUOTE]Clippers are starting to falter. Let them falter, do not help them get better. They could have the 19th-20th pick if they continue to slide and lose faith. That's better than 25-28. Having two top 20 picks would be really nice for the Celtics. Let somebody else make the Clips better. Whatever benefit the C's receive will be offset by lower draft position. Danny Granger went one pick ahead of Gerald Green in the low teens. Draft position means as much as anything to the Celtics future. Posted by arodrambone[/QUOTE] Valid valid point
     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from prakash. Show prakash's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]Clippers are starting to falter. Let them falter, do not help them get better. They could have the 19th-20th pick if they continue to slide and lose faith. That's better than 25-28. Having two top 20 picks would be really nice for the Celtics. Let somebody else make the Clips better. Whatever benefit the C's receive will be offset by lower draft position. Danny Granger went one pick ahead of Gerald Green in the low teens. Draft position means as much as anything to the Celtics future.
    Posted by arodrambone[/QUOTE]

    Perfect point!  Let the Clips falter.  Danny needs to work a way to get Josh Smith.  Ray, draft picks, whatever.  I don't care much about DeAndre Jordan.  He is an offensive liability, and afer losing Ray, the Celts will be a worse team offensively.  Also, the cap space reduces.  Just doesn't make sense.
     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rebels345209. Show Rebels345209's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    I think we need to lay to rest the clippers trading their ONLY center for Ray Allen
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from prakash. Show prakash's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : The Hawks want KG for Josh Smith.  Why would the Hawks want another SG when they already have Joe Johnson locked up for a very long time?
    Posted by Fiercest34[/QUOTE]

    OK.  But Ray for DeAndre Jordan still does not make any sense.  Perhaps can work on a multi team trade for Josh Smith.  Or perhaps it will not happen.
     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from CASox. Show CASox's posts

    Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray

    In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: Right on Cue: Clips Want Ray : OK.  But Ray for DeAndre Jordan still does not make any sense.  Perhaps can work on a multi team trade for Josh Smith.  Or perhaps it will not happen.
    Posted by prakash[/QUOTE]

    Not only does it not make sense, the Clips would not do Ray for DeAndre....if they trade DeAndre, they lose all of their inside defensive presence... it would be an absolute steal to get him but even the Clips arent that stupid..... Plus trading DeAndre would p i ss of the fans because he is really popular here.... and it would make Griffin really made because he and DeAndre are best friends....
     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share