Rondo for George HIll is fair?

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from billge. Show billge's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    Side note; How is the weather up there today, 37?

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    In response to Fierce34's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    rame

    I enjoy watching you squirm.

    So let's keep this thread alive forever.

    HAHAHA

    [/QUOTE]

    Squirm?

    You have been destroyed and humiliated on this thread.

    I have not squirmed once as you lost this argument last week and yet want to 'keep it going' for whatever sick weird reasoning you may have where you think the more you post that must mean the more likely you 'win'.

    It doesn't mean anything. You lost.

    I am allowed to argue that package of assets from Indy is fair value for rondo. Keep bringing whatever weak sauce you can Fierce. You lost the debate and continue to lose the game of life, showing us all how truly disturbed you really are.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    See.... it is that kind of assumption on what time zone I am (not one where it was 3am haha) and what my motives were (just making pretty funny posts about a VERY ignorant person) that show me you know you lost this one a loooong time ago.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    Like I said... only an IDIOT would think the trade idea was Rondo for Hill when clearly it was Rondo for two unprotected picks, 25 million dollars (being free of the Wallace deal) and a DISTANT 3rd was Hill.

    Hahahaha

    and I said I wouldn't even do it... only that it could be 'discussed' as being 'fair'

    What a sad, pathetic man you are for continuing to bring this up as some sort of 'proof' to you winning a competition with me in which you have been wrong over 20 times to my 2 or 3.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    It's common sense.

    I mean if you think it's fair then why won't you do it, right?

    [/QUOTE]

    Ummm.... because I think we can do better. Duh.

    It might be 'fair' to trade a tempermental 28 year old former all-star who never learned to shoot and has been labeled 'uncoachable' but wants a 100 million dollar max deal off an ACL injury for massive cap/$ savings, two unprotected 1st rd picks and a decent rotation 28 year old combo-guard who has trade value and can be flipped for another asset.

    But...

    I wouldn't have made the trade b/c I would gamble on the Celtics getting a better deal or Rondo staying and becoming a better player.

    But, RR can just as easily be given 100 million, not improve at all, and have a contract after age 30 that destroys this team.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Karllost. Show Karllost's posts

    Re: Rondo for George HIll is fair?

    Rondo at any price is a bad deal for the Celtics...Get rid of this punk asap for whatever you can get. Hes a loser!! DA knows this and unfortunately, so do most GMs around the league..  Even Brandon Knight wont be offered again for the narcissistic roller skater.

    As evidenced over a sample size of many seasons now... the Celtics are more successful with ROndo not playing than when he does play. Let RR be someone elses nightmare~

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share