The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from teejaytee70. Show teejaytee70's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this is silly...the celtics are not better without olynyk...we won with him and lost with him...

    [/QUOTE]

    Numbers don't lie.

    http://www.82games.com/1314/1314BOS.HTM

    [/QUOTE]

    Small sample numbers do.

    [/QUOTE]

    It's Chris33's latest knee-jerk, reactionary, blow-with-the-wind thread.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

     

    developing players is the Cs priority right now...or did i miss something 

    [/QUOTE]


    No, you're right. The focus is to give our young guys nba experience in nba roles, force them to step up. Tanking is just the expected result of asking guys with less than 164 games played to win on a team with no star point guard and a bunch of one dimentional role players.

     

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to Mployee8's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Whatever Danny gets for him ... I'm off the Asik bandwagon but if we get him that's ok for the time being. As you know I'm firmly in the Hawes camp now with the TPE running out in July I see this as a trade that works for both teams and will sit on it until another center is acquired. I like Drummond first but don't see Detroit making that deal even for Rondo but if Danny can pull it off ... BINGO!!!

    [/QUOTE]

    This is what I don't understand. There are no bandwagons. Asik is a proven good defensive center who can start on a winning team. Its about what it takes to get him. 

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this is silly...the celtics are not better without olynyk...we won with him and lost with him...

    [/QUOTE]

    Numbers don't lie.

    http://www.82games.com/1314/1314BOS.HTM

    [/QUOTE]

    Small sample numbers do.

    [/QUOTE]

    They are not small sample numbers.

    Olynyk is a rookie and he is not very good so far.

    [/QUOTE]


    Yes they are.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    I don't understand the beef here.

    Right now Oly is learning and adjusting. Right now Sully, Bass and Hump are more skilled.  

    That doesn't mean that Oly should be benched.  On the contrary, he may have more upside than any of the other three, but he must have develop and gain experience in order to add value and make an important impact on the Celtics in a couple years when they will be ready to compete.  On the pther hand, Bass and Hump will likely not be on the team.  Since winning has no relevance this year, why not play him as many minutes as practical.   The Celtics aren't trying to lose.  They are trying to rebuild quickly to bring a winning team back to Boston.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to teejaytee70's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this is silly...the celtics are not better without olynyk...we won with him and lost with him...

    [/QUOTE]

    Numbers don't lie.

    http://www.82games.com/1314/1314BOS.HTM

    [/QUOTE]

    Small sample numbers do.

    [/QUOTE]

    It's Chris33's latest knee-jerk, reactionary, blow-with-the-wind thread.

    [/QUOTE]

    Sorry, I just posted the stats.

    I don't do personal insults.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to teejaytee70's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this is silly...the celtics are not better without olynyk...we won with him and lost with him...

    [/QUOTE]

    Numbers don't lie.

    http://www.82games.com/1314/1314BOS.HTM

    [/QUOTE]

    Small sample numbers do.

    [/QUOTE]

    It's Chris33's latest knee-jerk, reactionary, blow-with-the-wind thread.

    [/QUOTE]

    Sorry, I just posted the stats.

    I don't do personal insults.

    [/QUOTE]

    Wasn't it you who chased out that new guy from the west coast because of a personnal attack?

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to Eldunker's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to teejaytee70's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to raider3524's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    this is silly...the celtics are not better without olynyk...we won with him and lost with him...

    [/QUOTE]

    Numbers don't lie.

    http://www.82games.com/1314/1314BOS.HTM

    [/QUOTE]

    Small sample numbers do.

    [/QUOTE]

    It's Chris33's latest knee-jerk, reactionary, blow-with-the-wind thread.

    [/QUOTE]

    Sorry, I just posted the stats.

    I don't do personal insults.

    [/QUOTE]

    Wasn't it you who chased out that new guy from the west coast because of a personnal attack?

    [/QUOTE]

    No. You are mistaking me for someone else.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    Ok sorry.  

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    OH SHUT UP !

    WHO CARES IF KRIS HUMPHRYS IS BETTER THAN K OLY RIGHT NOW, OLY LOOKS BETTER THAN DIRK NOWITSKI DID IN HIS ROOKIE YEAR !

    GIVE OLY ALL THE MINUTES HE CAN HANDLE AND NEXT SEASON WE HAVE A DEVELOPED 20/10 GUY FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS

     

    LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE FOR ONCE INSTEAD OF THINKING LIKE A FANTASY STAT GEEK 

    HOORAY FOR CANADA !

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to melswitt's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    This thread is twaddle based in hopeless boredom

    [/QUOTE]

    Not to worry.

    Olynyk is injured, so we will probably go on a winning streak.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: The Celtics are much better without Olynyk

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to melswitt's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    This thread is twaddle based in hopeless boredom

    [/QUOTE]

    Not to worry.

    Olynyk is injured, so we will probably go on a winning streak.

    [/QUOTE]

    You think?

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share