Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    With Crawford and Brooks as backup.

    I would like to see that.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Why bother when Rondo will be coming back this week.

    [/QUOTE]


    Just to see how it goes.

     

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Just to see how it goes.

     

    [/QUOTE]

     

    How Bayless played in the last 2 minutes is the reason why the Blazers and Griz gave up on him.

    He's nothing special.

    [/QUOTE]

    Who said he was?

    I want to see Crawford and Brooks play together.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Russell1. Show Russell1's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    Just to see how it goes.

     

    [/QUOTE]

     

    How Bayless played in the last 2 minutes is the reason why the Blazers and Griz gave up on him.

    He's nothing special.

    [/QUOTE]

    But niether is crawford. Im sick of watching dribble the clock down, just so he can throw up some junk!

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Russell1. Show Russell1's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Russell1's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

     

    But niether is crawford. Im sick of watching dribble the clock down, just so he can throw up some junk!

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Like I said, Rondo will be back this week.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I hope you are right. If you are not, I would much rather see Bayless at point instead of Crawford.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from PHX85014. Show PHX85014's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    OF COURSE BAYLESS SHOULD START WITH BRADLEY !

    WHAT'S THE HOLD UP ANYWAY ?

    THIS TEAM IS DEAD IN THE WATER, WHY NOT START BAYLESS ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

     

    AND WHY THE HOLD UP ON TRADES ?

    WHAT IS AINGE WAITING FOR ?

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    We are losing.

    The plan is working.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    We are losing.

    The plan is working.

    [/QUOTE] But will we continue to lose when Rondo comes back?  I don't see the point of bringing him back at this time. Losing is in our best interest, not getting Rondo back and trying to make a playoff push. 


     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    Bayless is an up grade over Lee,  and a better point guard than Crawford. Right now our starting five should be Bayless, Bradley. Green, Sully and Humphries. Rondo doesn't need to come back until after the all star break.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to kyceltic's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    But will we continue to lose when Rondo comes back?  I don't see the point of bringing him back at this time. Losing is in our best interest, not getting Rondo back and trying to make a playoff push.  

     

    [/QUOTE]

     


    Why are you worried about Rondo coming back?

    Unless Rondo becomes a decent 3-point shooter, the Celts are going to continue to lose.

     

    Rondo is at his best when he's surrounded by great players.

    Right now Rondo doesn't have an All-Star cast.

    [/QUOTE] Because we're not that far from winning some of these games we have lost. Rondo will make the C's better, we don't need to get better at this point.


     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to kyceltic's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    Bayless is an up grade over Lee,  and a better point guard than Crawford. Right now our starting five should be Bayless, Bradley. Green, Sully and Humphries. Rondo doesn't need to come back until after the all star break.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Stats, Lee's size, and defense show Lee is better overall.

     

    [/QUOTE] My eyes show me he's not.


     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to Fiercy's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to kyceltic's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    My eyes show me he's not.

     

    [/QUOTE]

     

    Doesn't matter.

    Lee is doing well in Memphis.

     

    Did you see Bayless turn the ball over late in the 4th last night?

     

    There's also Bayless' tendency to play hero ball.

     

    Portland gave up on Bayless.

    Memphis didn't think he's worth keeping.

     

    It's not like Bayless is a rookie or a 2nd year player.

     

    Bayless is just a backup PG.

    [/QUOTE]  Backup point guards are more important than backup shooting guards.  Bayless can play both positions.


     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Rajon-Hondo. Show Rajon-Hondo's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    Crawford seems to have regressed the few weeks and has started clowning more on the floor,Mike Gorman even mentioned that a couple of games ago, making the game about him than being a team player. Bayless is a better fit for us right now. I was hoping Crawford matured and was going to fill his potential more, which he did at first but now he has slid back to being a self absorbed player. I feel it would be in the Celts best interest to trade him . Maybe he'll improve when Rondo comes back playing as the second teams scorer but my concern is he seems to be all about JC and not his team right now. Bayless is a decent player not a great player but decent and I would consider resigning him at what he's making now,I believe 3 mil. If we don't trade Crawford, I'm hoping him and Bayless could give us a spark on the second unit.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    With Crawford and Brooks as backup.

    I would like to see that.

    [/QUOTE]

    Just a month ago people were talking like Crawford was going to a great pg. Now they want him on the bench for Bayless.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from 37stories. Show 37stories's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to kyceltic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    We are losing.

    The plan is working.

    [/QUOTE] But will we continue to lose when Rondo comes back?  I don't see the point of bringing him back at this time. Losing is in our best interest, not getting Rondo back and trying to make a playoff push. 


    [/QUOTE]

    Rondo isn't going to make a difference for this team. He will help a little, but not much.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from kyceltic. Show kyceltic's posts

    Re: Time to start Bayless with Bradley?

    In response to 37stories' comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to kyceltic's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to chris33's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    We are losing.

    The plan is working.

    [/QUOTE] But will we continue to lose when Rondo comes back?  I don't see the point of bringing him back at this time. Losing is in our best interest, not getting Rondo back and trying to make a playoff push. 


    [/QUOTE]

    Rondo isn't going to make a difference for this team. He will help a little, but not much.

    [/QUOTE]  A little may be the difference in a top 5 pick and a pick outside the top 10.


     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share