?
Trade for Oakfor?
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 2:09 AM EST
- lakersavenger
- Posts: 572
- First: 4/22/2011
- Last: 5/18/2013
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 3:45 AM EST
- Fierce34
- Posts: 10051
- First: 12/2/2009
- Last: 5/21/2013
In response to PHX85014's comment:
I think Okafor would be great with the Celtics , I would definitely trade Bass, Terry ,Collins and #1 pick to get him
Getting rid of Terry means Barbosa stays and plays a bigger role.
I think Okafor and Garnett would be awesome together and it would be great to get rid of Terry's and Bass's contracts.
Oakafor would be my #1 big man target , it might take less to get Gortat from the Suns but he is #2 on this list. I think Oakfer would be way better than Perkins next to Garnett
And you really think Washington would want a 35-year old Terry and a 34-year old Jason Collins?That trade only benefits the Celtics. In other words, it's a stupid trade.
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 3:47 AM EST
- Fierce34
- Posts: 10051
- First: 12/2/2009
- Last: 5/21/2013
In response to lakersavenger's comment:
I have gone out on the weekend, come home at 2-3 in the morning and read that Fierce continues to post at 12-2 am Boston time. You are right, rame, bullies are always a very lonely lot. He has been reported many times for crossing the line of civility here.
You mock Celtic fans and when Celtic fans fight back it's bullying?
And you really expect us to believe that you're a Laker fan and a Clipper fan at the same time? That's bull crap!
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 6:41 AM EST
- rameakap
- Posts: 15210
- First: 11/13/2006
- Last: 5/21/2013
In response to PHX85014's comment:
I think Okafor would be great with the Celtics , I would definitely trade Bass, Terry ,Collins and #1 pick to get him
Getting rid of Terry means Barbosa stays and plays a bigger role.
I think Okafor and Garnett would be awesome together and it would be great to get rid of Terry's and Bass's contracts.
Oakafor would be my #1 big man target , it might take less to get Gortat from the Suns but he is #2 on this list. I think Oakfer would be way better than Perkins next to Garnett
Washington has proven to move one bigger contract vet for 2 smaller ones recently already.It is a more realistic move than Bass/pick for Redick.
Nice to see Fierce shown up as always and called out for the low-life/no-life bully he is. Attacking others like a child 20 hours a day over the internet. What a loser.
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 9:07 AM EST
- Fierce34
- Posts: 10051
- First: 12/2/2009
- Last: 5/21/2013
In response to rameakap's comment:
In response to PHX85014's comment:
I think Okafor would be great with the Celtics , I would definitely trade Bass, Terry ,Collins and #1 pick to get him
Getting rid of Terry means Barbosa stays and plays a bigger role.
I think Okafor and Garnett would be awesome together and it would be great to get rid of Terry's and Bass's contracts.
Oakafor would be my #1 big man target , it might take less to get Gortat from the Suns but he is #2 on this list. I think Oakfer would be way better than Perkins next to Garnett
Washington has proven to move one bigger contract vet for 2 smaller ones recently already.It is a more realistic move than Bass/pick for Redick.
Nice to see Fierce shown up as always and called out for the low-life/no-life bully he is. Attacking others like a child 20 hours a day over the internet. What a loser.
Seriously, Washington would want the contracts of Bass and Terry?
Of course that trade benefits the Celtics but how does getting Terry and Bass benefit the Wizards?
After this season, the Wiz only need to pay Okafor 14.49m. If they get Terry and Bass, that's a total of 24m. Again, how does it benefit the Wiz?
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 10:35 PM EST
- PHX85014
- Posts: 611
- First: 7/11/2010
- Last: 5/20/2013
OK Fierce !
I get it , in terms of talent it is a lopsided trade in Boston's favor. But these trade happen. Washington may just want to dump Okafor's salary (to clear the way for Jan Vesely) and then they dump the guys they picked up next year. This is the WIZARDS we're talking about. They are never gonna win a championship and it's a tough business climate. Maybe this trade sells a few tickets and keeps the season ticket holders thinking SOMETHING positive is on the way.......
Financial considerations are 50% of all NBA trades. I GET IT ! It would be a great trade for Boston , and it just might happen.
Give me a break man !
And why can't I post pics with my posts anymore ?
-
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/1/2013 11:44 PM EST
- concord27
- Posts: 7564
- First: 6/16/2009
- Last: 5/21/2013
In response to PHX85014's comment:
I think Okafor would be great with the Celtics , I would definitely trade Bass, Terry ,Collins and #1 pick to get him
Getting rid of Terry means Barbosa stays and plays a bigger role.
I think Okafor and Garnett would be awesome together and it would be great to get rid of Terry's and Bass's contracts.
Oakafor would be my #1 big man target , it might take less to get Gortat from the Suns but he is #2 on this list. I think Oakfer would be way better than Perkins next to Garnett
Why would Washington want Terry and BAss? If anything they would want Lee and maybe Green. -
Re: Trade for Oakfor?
posted at 2/2/2013 6:33 AM EST
- srinivasa
- Posts: 1007
- First: 2/3/2011
- Last: 5/17/2013
Ainge said he didn't feel any pressure to add another rebounder, noting, "Actually, the center spot is probably our deepest spot with [Kevin Garnett], [Chris] Wilcox and [Jason] Collins playing and all healthy." Ainge added that depth will likely prevent rookie Fab Melo from getting much of an opportunity (he did play 2½ minutes of trash time on Friday and still looks insanely raw).