Trade idea

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxcodyfxx. Show xxcodyfxx's posts

    Trade idea

    Rondo to the pistons for Greg Monroe and there first round pick. This year or next. 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from CelticGreenLP. Show CelticGreenLP's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    They don't have a first this year, and can't trade their first next year due to trading this one. And Monroe is COMPLETELY OVERRATED!

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from myurkus. Show myurkus's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to CelticGreenLP's comment:

    They don't have a first this year, and can't trade their first next year due to trading this one. And Monroe is COMPLETELY OVERRATED!

      I would still trade rondo for him straight up, then draft smart. 


     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from CelticGreenLP. Show CelticGreenLP's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    Monroe averaged 15 & 9 in 31 mins, shot under 50%, has limited range, limited athleticism, and doesn't (or can't) play defense.  And he wants a near max contract. 

    There are 3 bigs (Sully, Humphries,Olynyk) already on the Celtics that would give you similar production with better efficiency if given the opportunity to play 31 mins a game, and for less $$$.  So why add Monroe? Why?

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from romneywins. Show romneywins's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    None of our bigs bring the type of bulk and presence that Monroe brings.  Fav compares as good or better but he is not talked about.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from billge. Show billge's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    Then, if Fav is as good or better, why doesn't he play? If he iswhat need for Monroe ?

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to romneywins' comment:

    None of our bigs bring the type of bulk and presence that Monroe brings.  Fav compares as good or better but he is not talked about.



    Fav com pares favorably to Melo, and not the one named "Anthony", and that ain't ,good!

    El Hombre' INVISIBLE' needs to get his act together right off the bat in camp or go back to the Euro League.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from romneywins. Show romneywins's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to billge's comment:

    Then, if Fav is as good or better, why doesn't he play? If he iswhat need for Monroe ?

    Mabey we were tuned into losing last year.  Mabey he was hurt, I am not sure about that.  I do know he looked pretty good at times and seemed to need coaching.  But he held his own, has size, looked like he could shoot well enough that he would need to be defended.  i am not sure what you think a first year NBA center should look like but it was his first year in the NBA, but he seemed to me to have the skills that could be channeled into playing the 5 spot.  Not a alllll-starrrr but a good solid player to play with some much better players than what he had to play with last year. Then we have the other center we drafted last year, that I though had some good upside at the 5.  WE have power forwards coming out of our rear end, so I don't think we need another power forward. We need a player or two that can finish a game and Yes I do not think Love is that guy.  I would rather have Anthony.  I hope that a different opinion does not upset you too much.


     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to romneywins' comment:

    In response to billge's comment:

    Then, if Fav is as good or better, why doesn't he play? If he iswhat need for Monroe ?

    Mabey we were tuned into losing last year.  Mabey he was hurt, I am not sure about that.  I do know he looked pretty good at times and seemed to need coaching.  But he held his own, has size, looked like he could shoot well enough that he would need to be defended.  i am not sure what you think a first year NBA center should look like but it was his first year in the NBA, but he seemed to me to have the skills that could be channeled into playing the 5 spot.  Not a alllll-starrrr but a good solid player to play with some much better players than what he had to play with last year. Then we have the other center we drafted last year, that I though had some good upside at the 5.  WE have power forwards coming out of our rear end, so I don't think we need another power forward. We need a player or two that can finish a game and Yes I do not think Love is that guy.  I would rather have Anthony.  I hope that a different opinion does not upset you too much.




    Only a Celtic "green teamer" could possiblt say Faux Hawk looked good last season...he SUCKED, absolutely and definitively...he had two good games, the first two, then fell off the edge of the earth....The leg injury had nothing to do with his disappearance....he'll be, at best, a third option at center in the NBA.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from CelticGreenLP. Show CelticGreenLP's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to romneywins' comment:

    None of our bigs bring the type of bulk and presence that Monroe brings.  Fav compares as good or better but he is not talked about.



    "Presence" is a completely immeasurable and subjective attribute.  I could argue that Sully and Humphries have more presence in game situations because they can score inside, but ALSO can step out and hit the 15-17 footers with regularity giving you more versatility within the offense. 

    And I don't know how much presence you expect a guy to have when he was the third or fourth best player on a 29 win team that was trying to make the playoffs. They won only 4 more games than the actively tanking Celtics.  Although this isn't all Monroe's fault, his lack of defense, motor and versatility didnt help at all either.

    Sully is plenty Bulky, and more versatile. Humphries is MUCH more active and athletic on both sides of the ball, which cancels out any advantage that Monroe's extra 15lbs gives him.  Olynyk is taller and more of a skills based player.  Oh and thank you for bringing up FAV.  You are right, he probably will be as good or better than Monroe or at least more well-rounded. So thats just one more reason to NOT acquire him. Especially if you are giving up good assets and paying him $14, $15 mil a year or more.

    He is the PF/C version of Jeff Green, a one (maybe two) trick pony with questionable competitiveness. Do we really want a team made up of guys like that? I don't.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from mellymel3. Show mellymel3's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    If this team moves on from Rondo they could hardly do worse than dumping Wallace for Jennings, seeing if Stevens youthful enthusiasm can carve out a perfect role for him, still only 24 years old, the way he did Jordan Crawford and then add Monroe, age 24, to recent 1st rd picks in the frontcourt ages 23 and 22.

    so many here would trade Rondo for LA's 7th pick or the Kings 8th pick, well Vonleh and Gordon could bothbe gone by 7. If they are, when it comes to bigs, I would rather have Monroe than Randle, Saric, Payne, Nurkic and Porzingas.

    Randle - A slightly undersized PF in Randle with a bad body, no left hand and a ceiling (in the opinion of myself and many) of a 14-17 point 7-9 rebound guy, if he works his butt off in the next 2 years he could get there by 2016-17. Monroe is better than that NOW. 

    Saric - More SF, a skilled Hedo Turkoglu type player who has to prove he can shoot and play NBA defense and like Randle will need to work his butt off for 2 years to get to probably a prime of Gordon Hayward stats (16p-5r-5a 43/36/81 %'s)

    Payne - Only 1 year younger than Monroe NOW and couldn't average 9 rebounds in college despite being a beast who looked like he could overpower every big he was ever on the court with

    Nurkic and Porzingas - TONS of upside, would have to wait out 2 years of them getting more polish overseas and then see. 50% of these guys turn into busts. One should be there at 17 anyhow.



    I must agree with you here! Good observation!

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxcodyfxx. Show xxcodyfxx's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    Hey rame I said next years first too read child.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from xxcodyfxx. Show xxcodyfxx's posts

    Re: Trade idea

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    Monroe is a lot like Al Jefferson. 

    He will never be as skilled a post man on offensive, nobody is like Al anymore these days, but he is an offensively gifted big with prototypical center size and a 'presence' that Olynyk and Sully do not have.

    For all the talk of how defensively we couldn't protect the rim last year, and the fact that Monroe will not help tremendously in that area (but he will help, make that clear), it was SCORING that was the bigger problem. Monroe could show up, play 32-34 minutes at center and score 15-17 points and provide 9-10 boards. He is still improving as player and needs a relocation after Drummond stole his thunder in Motown.

    Fav, a guy ranked 31st in all NBA players in limited sample size in rim defense can back him up for 10-12 mins of solid picks and hard fouls, and Olynyk can squeeze in 4-6 minutes. Sully (30 mins) and Oly (18) at PF would provide a ton of points there. 20/12 from Monroe and Fav and 25/15 from Sully/Oly is nothing to be down on, even if the defense will be a work in progress. Getting halfway to 90 points from 2 of your 5 positions is a win anyday in my book. 

     



    How is he over rated then?

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts