Trades I would like to see

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Trades I would like to see

    Note: NOT predictions. Some here never seem to get the concept that fun speculation is not what you are predicting to happen. Weird how petty and immature those same poster(s) are.

    So... if Rondo is in the plans for the future:

    1. Humphries and Bogans for Ben Gordon and Portland's #1 (24-26 range)

    - Bogans is needed so C's stay under the lux tax. Save 3.85 million.

    2. Bass and Favarani for Asik (save 75k)

    3. Joel Anthony, the Nets/Hawks pick in the 17-19 range this year and then our own pick top 3 protected next year for Gordon Hayward (lose 400k)

    Overall save 4.6 million.

     

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    Only worry is that the new lineup wins and pushes us way out of the lotto. Asik is not a hard player to integrate or need the ball. His D will be be huge for this club. He upgrades Favarani at that end right away and is a pure C where Hump is not. Anthony never plays.

    Stevens is of course very familiar with Haywards game. He pushes one of Pressey/Bayless out of the rotation and further cuts the minutes of Wallace.

    Gordon will rarely play but when he does he is better than Bogans.

    Hayward is a restricted free agent, obviously. I don't see him getting more than the 4/46 Batum got, which Ainge would and should easily match. But you never know. Dumping the 3.8m owed Anthony next year would take the sting out of having to go up to 12.5-13m per for Hayward (b/c we HAVE TO to match if giving up those two very good picks). Dumping the 9m owed Bass/Favarani makes paying 15m (for just 1 year) to Asik more bearable as well. Asik would be awesome resigned at 4/32 million (Perk). It would be a letdown if Ainge has to give him the 4/44 Larry Sanders contract.

    Anyhow, this should appease posters who thought this same trade with Olynyk instead of Anthony was unfair for us. Would the Jazz consider two picks likely in the teens, but one in a LOADED draft as fair value for Hayward? Who knows. I can bet if they get Wiggins or Parker they won't want to give Hayward the 5 year 55 million we gave Rondo at his age, even if it is probably fair.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    If Rondo is not in the plans for the future:

    1. Rondo, Wallace, Bass --> Detroit

        Monroe, Jennings, Charlie V's expiring, Will Bynum --> Boston

    2. Humphries for Asik staight up

    Most a team can offer restricted free agent Monroe is the 4/58 Hibbert got, which I would reluctantly match. Try to get him for the 12m a year Joakim Noah gets over 5 years. He'd only be 28 when that contract runs out.

    Jennings and Bradley would be an exciting backcourt.

    3. Still try for a Hayward trade. This time with Olynyk (no space with Monroe, Sully and Asik here) and the Nets/Hawks pick or our '15 #1 top 10 protected. Jazz can pick which one, not both.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    If Rondo is not in the plans for the future:

    1. Rondo, Wallace, Bass --> Detroit

        Monroe, Jennings, Charlie V's expiring, Will Bynum --> Boston

    2. Humphries for Asik staight up

    Most a team can offer restricted free agent Monroe is the 4/58 Hibbert got, which I would reluctantly match. Try to get him for the 12m a year Joakim Noah gets over 5 years. He'd only be 28 when that contract runs out.

    Jennings and Bradley would be an exciting backcourt.

    3. Still try for a Hayward trade. This time with Olynyk (no space with Monroe, Sully and Asik here) and the Nets/Hawks pick or our '15 #1 top 10 protected. Jazz can pick which one, not both.



    if we keep ab then there's no reason to go after hayward. but i like some your trade proposals though

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from romneywins. Show romneywins's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    Note: NOT predictions. Some here never seem to get the concept that fun speculation is not what you are predicting to happen. Weird how petty and immature those same poster(s) are.

    So... if Rondo is in the plans for the future:

    1. Humphries and Bogans for Ben Gordon and Portland's #1 (24-26 range)

    - Bogans is needed so C's stay under the lux tax. Save 3.85 million.

    2. Bass and Favarani for Asik (save 75k)

    3. Joel Anthony, the Nets/Hawks pick in the 17-19 range this year and then our own pick top 3 protected next year for Gordon Hayward (lose 400k)

    Overall save 4.6 million.

     



    I think Gordon Hayward will cost more, but he is a difference maker and seems to remind me of some past Celtics.  This needs to happen but it will cost us.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to rameakap's comment:

    Note: NOT predictions. Some here never seem to get the concept that fun speculation is not what you are predicting to happen. Weird how petty and immature those same poster(s) are.

    So... if Rondo is in the plans for the future:

    1. Humphries and Bogans for Ben Gordon and Portland's #1 (24-26 range)

    - Bogans is needed so C's stay under the lux tax. Save 3.85 million.

    2. Bass and Favarani for Asik (save 75k)

    3. Joel Anthony, the Nets/Hawks pick in the 17-19 range this year and then our own pick top 3 protected next year for Gordon Hayward (lose 400k)

    Overall save 4.6 million.

     




    I like the first two, but I think it will take more to get Hayward.  I was thinking we use AB and the pick we get from CHA, plus "future considerations" for Hayward.  We don't need AB and Hayward, and we can take a SG with our second pick.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

     

    I like the first two, but I think it will take more to get Hayward.  I was thinking we use AB and the pick we get from CHA, plus "future considerations" for Hayward.  We don't need AB and Hayward, and we can take a SG with our second pick.

     



    Agree with you that we don't need AB and Hayward.

     

     

    Also, Joel Anthony is not enough to get Gordon Hayward?

    HAHAHA




    Well, I agree that Anthony will not get us Hayward.  But the fun of this is actually getting Hayward.

    Personally, I'd trade Green for Hayward and a bad contract.  So,  I just enjoy reading other people's takes on things - we're all Celtics fans!!

     
  12. This post has been removed.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from scubber. Show scubber's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    I think at least they wait until after the draft to see where they are to make any deal like this,  but more realistically, a few more years.  They need to lay low, cut salary and strike when the situation is right.  Getting Hayward now and probably have to pay him substantial amount of money or any deal similar to this is the way to become perpetual middle of the road kind of team.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

     

    Well, I agree that Anthony will not get us Hayward.  But the fun of this is actually getting Hayward.

    Personally, I'd trade Green for Hayward and a bad contract.  So,  I just enjoy reading other people's takes on things - we're all Celtics fans!!

     



    Yes, we're all Celtic fans, but only some of us are crazy enough to believe that Joel Anthony and picks can get us Gordon Hayward.

     

     

    Like I said, Gordon Hayward will not be a Celtic this season.

    If the Celts want Hayward, they'd have to do a sign and trade for him in July.




    Well, I'd rather deal with people who think Kupchak is still the best GM in the league than anyone who wants to make our team better long term!!

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to Fiercy's comment:

    In response to hedleylamarr's comment:

     

     

    Well, I'd rather deal with people who think Kupchak is still the best GM in the league than anyone who wants to make our team better long term!!

     



    Ainge is planning on a long term solution.

     

    He would not have taken back the contract of Joel Anthony if he was planning on a quick rebuild.

    Joel Anthony's 3.8m salary next season hurts the Celts' salary cap situation in 2014-15.



    I disagree.

     

    A quick rebuild in this situation means a playoff team in 2014-15 and a contending team in 2015-16

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from greenkiller. Show greenkiller's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    The fungus has been spread on this thread...

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from R9R. Show R9R's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    I don't know why anyone would trade for Hayward. Just put pressure on the Jazz to match a strong contract offer. One of three things will happen. They match, and we move on. They decline, we get Hayward. They opt for a S&T at a little bit of a discount and we give up a future pick. All three options are ok.

     

    I'd gauge interest, then probably put in a 44M offer. I think he's not quite worth 11M next year, but has the oppotunity to grow into the deal. 

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from hedleylamarr. Show hedleylamarr's posts

    Re: Trades I would like to see

    In response to R9R's comment:

    I don't know why anyone would trade for Hayward. Just put pressure on the Jazz to match a strong contract offer. One of three things will happen. They match, and we move on. They decline, we get Hayward. They opt for a S&T at a little bit of a discount and we give up a future pick. All three options are ok.

     

    I'd gauge interest, then probably put in a 44M offer. I think he's not quite worth 11M next year, but has the oppotunity to grow into the deal. 




    I 100% agree with this idea.  However, WHAT do we do with Bradley?  Wouldn't it be ideal if we got Hayward and let Bradley walk?

    The only downside to your idea is if we let Bradley walk AND Utah matches our offer.  Then we end up with neither.

    It is this situation I am trying to avoid........

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share