why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Sign and trade CP3 and Jordan

    for

    Rondo, Bass, Lee, Melo and rd picks 

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to APpats21's comment:

     

    Because the Clips would never do this. They want to keep Chris Paul not trade him away.

     



    why not? Chris Paul could just walk away by july 1st he will be free agent. 

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Rondo, pierce, and kg for paul, jordan, and butler.  That is a little closer to possible.  LA would be getting the better overall talent, C's would be getting the youth.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Clips now are in a hurry because there's no assurance from cp3 to stay in l.a

     

    Rondo, Pierce(rights to buy out), Bass, Lee and Melo

    for

    Chris Paul, Butler, Jordan

     

    *Clips could sign talented free agent such as Josh smith and then Griffin and bledsoe for Dwight Howard

     

    Clips

    Rondo

    Crawford

    Pierce

    Josh Smith

    Howard

     

    Celtics

    CP3

    Bradley

    Green

    KG/Sully

    KG/Jordan

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from kaktug. Show kaktug's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Not gonna happen, but if we were to trade for Paul, we'd keep doc, KG, and pierce, b/c he wants to play with those guys. So we'd have to give up rondo and pretty much everyone else. 

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to kaktug's comment:

     

    Not gonna happen, but if we were to trade for Paul, we'd keep doc, KG, and pierce, b/c he wants to play with those guys. So we'd have to give up rondo and pretty much everyone else. 

     



    the point is clips had no choice because  paul could leave them by 1st of july.

     

    Rondo, Pierce, Bass and Lee, Melo and picks for CP3 and Jordan to Boston

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from jacqm64. Show jacqm64's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    I like your thought process, but the Clippers would never do it.

    Interested to see what CP will do on JULY 1.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Paul and Jordan for Pierce and KG.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from fl+adam,. Show fl+adam,'s posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to chris33's comment:

    Paul and Jordan for Pierce and KG.




    I like it, but we'd then have to trade Rondo for a big or SG...and then draft the other.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from darkman20. Show darkman20's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    No way the Clips would give up Chris Paul for anything the Celts can offer.   Sorry but even 5 Rondos does not equal a Chris Paul.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to darkman20's comment:

    No way the Clips would give up Chris Paul for anything the Celts can offer.   Sorry but even 5 Rondos does not equal a Chris Paul.




    The Clippers don't own the rights to Chris Paul after July 1.

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from darkman20. Show darkman20's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to chris33's comment:

    In response to darkman20's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     

    No way the Clips would give up Chris Paul for anything the Celts can offer.   Sorry but even 5 Rondos does not equal a Chris Paul.

     




    The Clippers don't own the rights to Chris Paul after July 1.

     

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I stand corrected, I forgot about that.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from chris33. Show chris33's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    Does the failure of this deal mean that the Clippers are going to let Chris Paul walk?

     

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheBigTicket05. Show TheBigTicket05's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to chris33's comment:

     

    Does the failure of this deal mean that the Clippers are going to let Chris Paul walk?

     

     



    thats the point, if clips were up to gain something then they should consider this trade

     

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from myurkus. Show myurkus's posts

    Re: why not go after for Chris Paul and Jordan??

    In response to TheBigTicket05's comment:  in a million years this would never happen.  first, paul would have to agree to a sign and trade.  secondly, he can't just walk.  not very many teams can take on a max contract, and some of them he would never want to go to. his options are somewhat limited. lastly, then clips aren't trading cp3 for rondo and our crappy contracts.

    In response to APpats21's comment:

     

    Because the Clips would never do this. They want to keep Chris Paul not trade him away.

     



    why not? Chris Paul could just walk away by july 1st he will be free agent. 

     




     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share