Re: ACC Team Records For BC Athletics
posted at 2/10/2012 3:06 PM EST
In Response to Re: ACC Team Records For BC Athletics
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: ACC Team Records For BC Athletics : the one smart thing you've done today is try to debate the future and not the past. I have better things to do than speculate on where BC will be going but looking at this terrible team, I don't think the ceiling is that high. This team doesn't have 1 player than has even a REMOTE chance in playing in the NBA. BC is a doormat in football and hoops but luckily the ACC has a bunch of doormats this year (Gtech,clemson, wake forest and BC). You do understand when 2 bad teams play, one HAS to win? Back to the Uconn not in the ACC angle, AGAIN (ad nauseam) the ACC wanted Uconn over Pitt and GDF whined and cried and they backed off. I see a similarity in all you BC guys (whining and crying). Same old Same old from the BC faithful.... excuses, let's debate the future, and let's act like the ACC wants us more than Uconn.... The ACC would gladly get rid of BC if they could do it over again? Adding BC has been an ACC failure as they haven't added anything to the ACC, only detracted especially from a Sports viewpoint.
Posted by Donnnn[/QUOTE]
Ahhh..the true delusions of a Uconn poster. Where do I begin?
In one sentence you say that BC brings nothing the ACC. In another sentence you claim that BC was so powerful that they were able to pull some kind of tantrum that somehow "forced" all of the other ACC members to back off Uconn.
Are you not able to see the inconsistency of your argument?
Yes, it is true that BC didn't want Uconn in the ACC. That has been well publicized. However, apparently neither did others as well since BC cannot block a team by itself. It takes at least 4 schools to do that.
This notion that the ACC wanted Uconn and not Pitt is a fiction that only exists among Uconn fans in order to reconcile with the fact that they were not selected by the ACC. Instead, they portray BC as some sort of powerful villain that single handily derailed Uconn. Never mind that these same Uconn fans have continued to mock BC as a toothless tiger with no clout in the ACC.
The ACC wanted Pitt and SU. Not Uconn. Deal with it. Your rationalization leaves you arguing against yourself.
Oh, BTW, the ACC is very happy with BC and they have said so repeatedly, from the ACC Commissioner on down. Your comments on this are just more crap that you cannot back up and are intended to allow you to rationalize why BC is in the ACC and Uconn is not.
Your comment that BC has not contributed anything to the ACC "from a sports standpoint" is absurd. Since coming to the ACC, they have won more FB games than any other ACC team not named VT, they have made the ACCCG twice, they are in the top half of the ACC in Men's BB for games won, made the NCAA's numerous times, and played in the ACC Men's BB championship game. They have won the ACC Soccer Title and the Women's Soccer team has had great success.
Finally, your comment that you have "better things to do than speculate on where BC will be going" is laughable. You are obsessed with BC and post about BC all day long. As they say: "you are know by your deeds".
I follow BC sports because I enjoy them. Most importantly, my enjoyment of a team is not limited to its W-L records. For you to name-call someone "dumb" who has different values and priorities than you shows, IMO, just what an imbecile you are.