Why Gloucester AT Lincoln Sudbury & Weymouth AT BR?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Capevector. Show Capevector's posts

    Why Gloucester AT Lincoln Sudbury & Weymouth AT BR?

    posted at 11/27/2010 10:40 AM EST

    Does anyone have the answer why these teams are being forced to play at the home field of their playoff opponent instead of a neutral site? Seems like a stiff penalty for both, especially defending SB champion Gloucester & winner of 26 or so straight games. 
     

  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from EasySpirit. Show EasySpirit's posts

    Re: Why Gloucester AT Lincoln Sudbury & Weymouth AT BR?

    posted at 11/29/2010 3:23 PM EST

     Check out the MIAA website for site selection info -- 
     http://miaa.net/football-2010-format.pdf
     All games have to be played on artificial turf, under the lights.
     Do Gloucester and Weymouth have turf?
     
     

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from scrapa-. Show scrapa-'s posts

    Re: Why Gloucester AT Lincoln Sudbury & Weymouth AT BR?

    posted at 11/29/2010 6:03 PM EST

    Weymouth has turf and lights.  Gloucester has grass.  There is no shortage of turf fields with lights in Eastern Mass.
     

  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from congobar63. Show congobar63's posts

    Re: Why Gloucester AT Lincoln Sudbury & Weymouth AT BR?

    posted at 12/3/2010 1:18 PM EST

    Yeah-Nice ride to Weymouth for Mansfield and Walpole--when both fields were available, as was Franklin's. Rt 128 Traffic made for a nightmare ride over...