2011 Draft

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : Absolutley, the football is going to be a bit more smash mouth than it has been of late. I would like a FB for obvious reseason; They need to be respected because a carry is not out of the question, most can catch ball out of the backfield as well. More importantly if we were running 3TE with the Xfactor Hernandez in the Slot we could use one as a personal body guard for Brady. Moving forward to next year i think my man Faulk will retire, Sammy Morris and Fred Taylor will probably retire as well... So we need to sign Woodhead and BJGE to and extension... That would give us a blue collar goal line back BJGE and a third down back... The onlything missing is a FB and a Primetime gamebreaker. My draft looks like this; 1A- Allen Baily 1B- Pouncey (replacement for Koppen or Neal) 2A- Jeremy Beal 2B-James Brewer (RT) Vollmer replaces Light @ LT 3A-Daniel Thomas (i think he may drop here 6'2" 225) 3B-Stan Havili I hope we retain the following FA 1 Matt Light OT 2010 GOES TO THE BENCH 2 Fred Taylor RB 2010-RETIRES 3 Kevin Faulk (IR) RB 2010 RETIRES 4 Jarrod Page SS 2010 SIGN 5 Logan Mankins OG 2010 TAG IF YOU CAN A 2ND WOULD BE NICE 6 Sammy Morris RB 2010 RETIRES 7 Gerard Warren DT 2010 SIGN 8 Quinn Ojinnaka OL 2010 9 BenJarvus Green-Ellis RB 2010 SIGN 10 Tracy White ILB 2010 SIGN 11 Ryan Wendell OG 2010 12 Kyle Arrington CB 2010 SIGN 13 Danny Woodhead RB 2010 SIGN  
    Posted by tagandtrade

    I agree with most of this and like your mock.  I too would love a FB in the 3-4 round range and we talked about a couple of guys.  We need to acquire at least 2 RBs because I too think Faulk, Morris, and Taylor will be gone.  Woodhead certainly looked good in two games as a third down back on draws or coming out of the backfield but he doesn't have the size to be as good a blocker picking up blitzes as Faulk was.  I worry about that.  I think BJGE needs and deserves an extension.  So yes, we need a home run hitter and a bruising FB who can catch.

    I'm not as gunho on drafting DL in the first round this year the more I look at this.  We should've done that last year.  The talent pool is thin and the guys who are there don't have the ideal size to play 34 DE.  For me they should be 6-4+ and 305 lbs +.  Bailey and Heyward could add some weight but neither in my mind are worthy of a top 10 pick for our scheme.  We drafted Seymour 6th overall and neither of these guys project to be the next Seymour.  The more I think about it I think we need to go OLB with one of those 1st round picks then either OL or CB with the other.

    I have been a HUGE advocate for addressing our OL for a couple of years now.  Some of our guys are getting long in the tooth.  Mankins appears gone and Connolly so far has done a decent job replacing him.  I would like to see Vollmer stay on the right side where he can be more effective in the run game.  Light should be gone and Neal when healthy is still great.  He signed a two year extension but let's face it, his tires have been retreaded twice now.  So, we need a mean and nasty C/OG type and a LT.  Everyone is talking about Mike Pouncey.  I like him but I don't think he's as good as his brother.  BB also has a history of not taking OL in the first round.  He prefers to draft them a little later and coach them up.  Mankins was the lone exception.  Light and Vollmer were both 2nd round picks.  But with two picks in the 1st and a high 2nd, I would be shocked if we didn't take one OL with one of those first 3 picks.

    BB almost never goes for skill players in round 1 either.  Maroney was the lone exception.  He prefers to acquire RBs and WRs via trade or F/A where they have an NFL track record.  I don't see him drafting a RB high.  A RB or FB in round 3-4 he might do.  I watched the Georgia Tech game and Anthony Allen looked really good, strong and decisive.  He could be an option in the 3rd.  His teammate FB Lucas Cox looked like a bull dozer but he would be an undrafted type. 

    If I was picking today and all the top juniors declared, I might do something like this.

    1a WR Julio Jones - Alabama
    1b OLB Akeem Ayers - UCLA
    2a OT Gabe Carimi - Wisconsin
    2b CB Chimdi Chekwa - Ohio State
    3a OG James Wilson - Florida
    3b RB Anthony Allen - Georgia Tech
    4a FB Owen Marecic - Stanford
    4b FS TeJay Johnson - TCU
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    there will be no trading down if there is a rookie salarie cap. salarie cap happens to be one thing that players union and owners will agree on.
    Posted by seattlepat70


    They may agree on any number of things, but until they agree on all of them, it doesn't change anything.  They won't impose a rookie scale independent of a CBA.  There's going to be a process involving a lockout and then maybe some canceled games if not the whole season.  It's highly unlikely to get resolved before the draft.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : Are you saying that the rookie cap isn't likely to affect players taken in the 2011 draft?  I was under the impression the rookie cap would be a key component of any new CBA and that this is one of the reasons the Pats were looking to load up in 2011.  If I'm wrong, great.  I hope a lot of juniors come out so we can have a crack at them. 
    Posted by Faucetman


    No rookie pay scale until a CBA is signed, which to repeat my previous post, is not very likely to happen until, optimistically, the start of next season.  More likely sometime after the season starts (and people start missing paychecks).  They can't even lock the players out until March, and that's a foregone conclusion.  So there's no way in creation they get a CBA signed before the draft. 
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    Faucet good stuff, Bailey and Heyward could add some weight but neither in my mind are worthy of a top 10 pick for our scheme.  Yeah, that is my fundamental concern. They are perfect for most other 34 teams, like SD, Pitt, and GB who routinely carry 290 lb guys on their line. But BB likes his kids big. Drafting players in order to gain 10lbs is not always the best idea, because you don't know if they can or if they do you don't know how it will affect their overall play.  At the same time, I feel there is pressure to use that (sure) top five-six pick to grab a big 34 END. They are so hard to come by. Honestly, though. I don't think Julio Jones is top ten material. I watch him, a lot. He just isn't that safe a bet in the NFL IMO. I think he has a great ceiling as nasty possession WR with a little wiggle. But for NFL competition I doubt his open field skills and ability to get open will ever be elite. They could be elite with development, but they don't seem a safe bet to me. I think it's just as likely NE could grab him at the bottom of the round.
    Posted by zbellino


    Wow, really on Julio?  I watched him yesterday and he was the only who impressed me on Alabama but the whole team was off.  But then again, he was going up against some small corners.  I haven't found the one guy who is a top 10 talent to fall in love with except for Patrick Peterson and I think he'll come off within the first 3 picks.  I think BUF will go with Luck.  Then whoever is picking before us will certainly need a shut down corner.

    Who do you like with the Raider's pick Z? 
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    Faucetman, I was thinking this new style of O needs a FB too... Would you draft one higher than the fourth?
    Posted by tagandtrade


    I'd love for them to target a FB and was pushing for them to go after the Terminator in the 2010 draft.  With that being said, FB isn't generally considered a premium postion so players are generally available in the later rounds.

    One kid I'm extremely high on is Owen Marecic (6-1 244 FB/LB Stanford), here's what I posted about him on another thread:

    Talk about a true "Patriot Type", Owen Marecic (6-1 244) the FB/LB (yes he starts on both sides of the ball) from Stanford is one of the toughest players I've seen in a while, a true throwback.  He's a devastating lead blocker and shows suprising instincts at ILB, looks tough against the run and appears to possess good awarness in coverage.  He also just scored on back to back possessions, one on a fullback dive play and then on an INT return.

    I'd love to see this kid in Foxboro.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : I'd love for them to target a FB and was pushing for them to go after the Terminator in the 2010 draft.  With that being said, FB isn't generally considered a premium postion so players are generally available in the later rounds. One kid I'm extremely high on is Owen Marecic (6-1 244 FB/LB Stanford), here's what I posted about him on another thread: Talk about a true "Patriot Type", Owen Marecic (6-1 244) the FB/LB (yes he starts on both sides of the ball) from Stanford is one of the toughest players I've seen in a while, a true throwback.  He's a devastating lead blocker and shows suprising instincts at ILB, looks tough against the run and appears to possess good awarness in coverage.  He also just scored on back to back possessions, one on a fullback dive play and then on an INT return. I'd love to see this kid in Foxboro.
    Posted by mbeaulieu07

    Hey MB, read back a couple of posts.  I took him with our DEN pick in the 4th round.  Not sure he'll be there, might have to use our MIN pick in the 3rd but I'm with you on this kid.

    Who was that FB we had before Patrick Pass during the Bledsoe years?  He was devastating.  We need to go back to playing smash mouth football. The finesse days of Moss are over.  They were fun while they lasted but to win in December and January we need to be able to run the ball.  By doing so we can hopefully extend Brady's career too.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : Hey MB, read back a couple of posts.  I took him with our DEN pick in the 4th round.  Not sure he'll be there, might have to use our MIN pick in the 3rd but I'm with you on this kid. Who was that FB we had before Patrick Pass during the Bledsoe years?  He was devastating.  We need to go back to playing smash mouth football. The finesse days of Moss are over.  They were fun while they lasted but to win in December and January we need to be able to run the ball.  By doing so we can hopefully extend Brady's career too.
    Posted by Faucetman


    My bad man,  I didn't read all of the posts on this thread.

    You're probably talking about Marc Edwards?  He was a big part of the offense in 2001 and 2002, versatile player, caught 48 balls out of the backfield over those years.

    I do love the assumed move back to their championship roots, smash mouth, spread the ball around to the open receiver style of offense, they had a lot of success with it. 
     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    I think a true FB is almost a wasted roster spot in todays NFL. But carrying 3 backs with different skill sets is the new wave. Of course this would all depend on what they think of BJGE as a 15-20 carry back and if they feel Woodhead is the real deal and can become the quick change of pace draw/receiving back like Faulk was. The way a look at this RB core shaping up next year is:

    BJGE - your main back who gets 15-20 carries a game
    Woodhead - smaller 3rd down draw/receiving back who is a nice change of pace
    Bruising back - A larger back who isn't a true FB but is there for short yardage and blocking schemes.

    For the bruising back there are a couple names that come to mind right now:

    Anthony Allen - Goergia Tech
    Via Taua - Neveda (starting to become my person favorite right now)
    Mikel Lishoure - Illinois (One that Laz clued me into)
     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from sasman. Show sasman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    Chances are the new CBA and a rookie wage scale will not be in place before the 2011 draft.  How does that affect the draft?  Will the Pats draft with the assumption of a rookie wage scale being part of the new CBA?
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    I think a true FB is almost a wasted roster spot in todays NFL. But carrying 3 backs with different skill sets is the new wave. Of course this would all depend on what they think of BJGE as a 15-20 carry back and if they feel Woodhead is the real deal and can become the quick change of pace draw/receiving back like Faulk was. The way a look at this RB core shaping up next year is: BJGE - your main back who gets 15-20 carries a game Woodhead - smaller 3rd down draw/receiving back who is a nice change of pace Bruising back - A larger back who isn't a true FB but is there for short yardage and blocking schemes. For the bruising back there are a couple names that come to mind right now: Anthony Allen - Goergia Tech Via Taua - Neveda (starting to become my person favorite right now) Mikel Lishoure - Illinois (One that Laz clued me into)
    Posted by PatsEng


    I think it's all dependant on the offensive scheme that you run, a team that likes to go 5 wide, operate primarily out of the spread and/or shotgun probably doesn't see the value in one while a team that likes to establish and create off a power running game would.  Ladainian Tomlinson for example will go down as one of the best backs in NFL history and thats largely due to his skill set as well as Lorenzo Neal.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    One player that no one is talking about who could be an option is Robert Quinn from UNC.  I know he is suspended, but he is an athletic freak built exactly like Brian Orakpo, who I loved coming out, and DeMarcus Ware. If NE is looking for a kid who can rush the passer, look no further.  Although character definitely becomes an issue with this one, and uncertainty about whether he will come out or not based on missing this season.  Does anyone know when his suspension is going to end? I know it was for lesser crimes -- talking to an agent -- than Austin, who cheated by having a tutor take tests for him. I think Quinn's brain-tumor recovery and consistent good behavior/leadership outweigh this one in some respects. 
    Posted by zbellino



    This was actually a topic of debate on the other draft thread, Peterson vs. Quinn who do you take with Oakland's pick if both are available.  I think both are clear top 10 talents at this point.

    I know you're an LSU guy and assume you'd lean towards Peterson as well, he's my choice between the two because of his potential to take away half of the field defensively while also providing value on special teams.
     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : I think it's all dependant on the offensive scheme that you run, a team that likes to go 5 wide, operate primarily out of the spread and/or shotgun probably doesn't see the value in one while a team that likes to establish and create off a power running game would.  Ladainian Tomlinson for example will go down as one of the best backs in NFL history and thats largely due to his skill set as well as Lorenzo Neal.
    Posted by mbeaulieu07


    Well the reason I say this is because the league is becoming a pass first QB league. You're not going to see a lot of power I formations on 1st and 2nd down anymore. At least not the way that they were used in the past. Having that large Bruising back allows you to setup in that formation as the FB role from time to time but it might be hard to justify that pure FB on rosters built for depth unless you have a Lorenzo Neal, who could arguable be the best FB of all time
     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BSII. Show BSII's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    I am impressed with the WR talent in college football.  Lot of 6'4" fast and productive guys.  They were on display yesterday, Julio Jones vs. Alshon Jeffrey, LSU's Toliver carrying Florida DB 10 yrds into end zone and catching game winner on nice fade route, Freshman Woods from USC racking up 220 yds.   

    I'd like to see Pats get one of these big WR in 2011 draft.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    I am impressed with the WR talent in college football.  Lot of 6'4" fast and productive guys.  They were on display yesterday, Julio Jones vs. Alshon Jeffrey, LSU's Toliver carrying Florida DB 10 yrds into end zone and catching game winner on nice fade route, Freshman Woods from USC racking up 220 yds.    I'd like to see Pats get one of these big WR in 2011 draft.
    Posted by BSII


    Keep in mind that BB generally targets WR's that are fast, have good short area quickness in and out of breaks and move well laterally.  That generally translates into "smaller" receivers.
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from tagandtrade. Show tagandtrade's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : I agree with most of this and like your mock.  I too would love a FB in the 3-4 round range and we talked about a couple of guys.  We need to acquire at least 2 RBs because I too think Faulk, Morris, and Taylor will be gone.  Woodhead certainly looked good in two games as a third down back on draws or coming out of the backfield but he doesn't have the size to be as good a blocker picking up blitzes as Faulk was.  I worry about that.  I think BJGE needs and deserves an extension.  So yes, we need a home run hitter and a bruising FB who can catch. I'm not as gunho on drafting DL in the first round this year the more I look at this.  We should've done that last year.  The talent pool is thin and the guys who are there don't have the ideal size to play 34 DE.  For me they should be 6-4+ and 305 lbs +.  Bailey and Heyward could add some weight but neither in my mind are worthy of a top 10 pick for our scheme.  We drafted Seymour 6th overall and neither of these guys project to be the next Seymour.  The more I think about it I think we need to go OLB with one of those 1st round picks then either OL or CB with the other. I have been a HUGE advocate for addressing our OL for a couple of years now.  Some of our guys are getting long in the tooth.  Mankins appears gone and Connolly so far has done a decent job replacing him.  I would like to see Vollmer stay on the right side where he can be more effective in the run game.  Light should be gone and Neal when healthy is still great.  He signed a two year extension but let's face it, his tires have been retreaded twice now.  So, we need a mean and nasty C/OG type and a LT.  Everyone is talking about Mike Pouncey.  I like him but I don't think he's as good as his brother.  BB also has a history of not taking OL in the first round.  He prefers to draft them a little later and coach them up.  Mankins was the lone exception.  Light and Vollmer were both 2nd round picks.  But with two picks in the 1st and a high 2nd, I would be shocked if we didn't take one OL with one of those first 3 picks. BB almost never goes for skill players in round 1 either.  Maroney was the lone exception.  He prefers to acquire RBs and WRs via trade or F/A where they have an NFL track record.  I don't see him drafting a RB high.  A RB or FB in round 3-4 he might do.  I watched the Georgia Tech game and Anthony Allen looked really good, strong and decisive.  He could be an option in the 3rd.  His teammate FB Lucas Cox looked like a bull dozer but he would be an undrafted type.  If I was picking today and all the top juniors declared, I might do something like this. 1a WR Julio Jones - Alabama 1b OLB Akeem Ayers - UCLA 2a OT Gabe Carimi - Wisconsin 2b CB Chimdi Chekwa - Ohio State 3a OG James Wilson - Florida 3b RB Anthony Allen - Georgia Tech 4a FB Owen Marecic - Stanford 4b FS TeJay Johnson - TCU
    Posted by Faucetman


    If these picks are worth as much as they say they are we could jump out of the top 10 and acquire multiple picks. I'm not against beefing up the OL in this draft... a 3/4 DE is not a huge need but if Bailey is the best available they may draft him if they cannot move the pick. I would be comfortable with Brace, Wilfork and Ty Warren can create some continuity on the line for the next 3 years. After 2013 Warren will fade away but Brace and Fork will still be around.

    I find it funny that fans say BB built this D from the trentches out???? Did he really? Bruschi, Johnson, and McGinest were all hear allready.... Maybe he would built it on LB's if he HAD too.

    Big charater guy that i would love to see on this team is Herzlich... I do not know where he is going to fall but i would take Akeem Ayers and Herlick in the right spot @ the right time.

    Not too mention Deadrick and Pryor are pretty darn good in this system and they are late picks.

    Another wrinkle we may have to consider is Meariwhethers play and his attitude, if it does not improve we will need a FS earlier than we thought.

     
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    MB, Ask anyone here, I give the straight dope on LSU players. I didn't talk up Dorsey, and even said he would be a poor fit here. I won't talk up Drake Nevis this season, as he has a ton of questions despite being the flat out most dominant tackle in the NCAA.  I will talk up Peterson, because the kid is all-world.  If I leaned toward Peterson it would be because he is a team leader and all-world talent. CBs of his caliber are extremely, extremely rare coming out. Who was the last? Champ? Woodson? Whereas, every other season there is a guy like Quinn, it is just rare you have a selection in that range -- lol, I was truly upset NE couldn't stab at Orakpo, lol. However, given Bodden and McCourty are here for a few, and NE needs more youth at OLB, I might be forced to side with Quinn, noting that Peterson is a rarer talent.  That is, of course, completely overlooking the fact that Quinn has a.) missed a season, and b.) done so because of disciplinary reasons. That casts shadows on his character and hinders his development in the eyes of scouts ... especially scouts that value experience (see: NE Pats scouts who love experience).
    Posted by zbellino


    Well Peterson is without a doubt a rare talent but you're right with Bodden and McCourty right now there is no room for him. Bodden is a top 10 cb imo and McCourty will be or better too. As much as I'd love to have Peterson he's a luxury (can't believe I said that). I do think if we have a top 5 pick you have to go DL. Sure DL are a dime a dozen with one huge exception top 5 DL's in the draft. You can go down the line and you'd be hard pressed to find one that really missed and didn't make a huge impact for their team.

    I feel all this team really needs is a big DE that can put pressure (notice I said pressure not rush) and set the edge on runs, a rush OLB that knows where he needs to be opposite Cunningham and can do a decent job covering in the box, and a couple OLman that don't need to make an immediate impact but can take over for Neal, Koppen, and/or Light within the next couple years
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : My bad man,  I didn't read all of the posts on this thread. You're probably talking about Marc Edwards?  He was a big part of the offense in 2001 and 2002, versatile player, caught 48 balls out of the backfield over those years. I do love the assumed move back to their championship roots, smash mouth, spread the ball around to the open receiver style of offense, they had a lot of success with it. 
    Posted by mbeaulieu07

    Sam Gash!!!  That's who I meant.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    Chances are the new CBA and a rookie wage scale will not be in place before the 2011 draft.  How does that affect the draft?  Will the Pats draft with the assumption of a rookie wage scale being part of the new CBA?
    Posted by sasman

    I don't think it matters if the CBA is in place by draft day.  Usually teams don't start signing players until mini camps or after.  If it looks like there will be a rookie cap, I bet all teams will hold off on rookie contracts waiting to see or perhaps the contract would be voided if signed before the CBA and it violates it.  Or, if the team is dumb enough to award a big rookie contract before the CBA, it's their tough problem.  Not sure though, just guessing.
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    Chances are the new CBA and a rookie wage scale will not be in place before the 2011 draft.  How does that affect the draft?  Will the Pats draft with the assumption of a rookie wage scale being part of the new CBA?
    Posted by sasman

    I don't think it matters if the CBA is in place by draft day.  Usually teams don't start signing players until mini camps or after.  If it looks like there will be a rookie cap, I bet all teams will hold off on rookie contracts waiting to see or perhaps the contract would be voided if signed before the CBA and it violates it.  Or, if the team is dumb enough to award a big rookie contract before the CBA, it's their tough problem.  Not sure though, just guessing.
     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft : Well Peterson is without a doubt a rare talent but you're right with Bodden and McCourty right now there is no room for him. Bodden is a top 10 cb imo and McCourty will be or better too. As much as I'd love to have Peterson he's a luxury (can't believe I said that). I do think if we have a top 5 pick you have to go DL. Sure DL are a dime a dozen with one huge exception top 5 DL's in the draft. You can go down the line and you'd be hard pressed to find one that really missed and didn't make a huge impact for their team. I feel all this team really needs is a big DE that can put pressure (notice I said pressure not rush) and set the edge on runs, a rush OLB that knows where he needs to be opposite Cunningham and can do a decent job covering in the box, and a couple OLman that don't need to make an immediate impact but can take over for Neal, Koppen, and/or Light within the next couple years
    Posted by PatsEng

    I don't think you can every have too many quality corners given all the nickel and dime sets we use.  Bodden and McCourty are our only studs, lose one and we're screwed.  If there is any chance of landing Peterson, I think we should go for it. We then use McCourty in the slot and more in the return game.  He'll see plenty of reps.  We have 8 picks in the top 125 or so and 4 picks in the top 56 or so.  Taking a once-in-a-decade corner with a rookie cap is smart IMO.  But Oakland upset SD just now, so that hurts the cause.
     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Faucetman. Show Faucetman's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    In Response to Re: 2011 Draft:
    Just for fun ... 1st (OAK) -- Robert Quinn OLB/DE 1st (NE) -- Nick Fairley 34DE 2nd (CAR)  -- Julio Jones or John Baldwin WR 2nd (NE) --Jason Pinkston OT
    Posted by zbellino

    I don't think the Raiders are going to cooperate enough for us to land Quinn.  I think the pick is looking more like a 10-12 pick now.  CAR is helping us though.  If we have things locked up or are out of it by week 16, we might want to consider dropping the BUF game if it means they finish ahead of CAR, lol.

    1-12   OLB Akeen Ayers
    1-25   DT Jarod Crick
    2-33   WR Jonathan Baldwin
    2-57   OT Mike Adams
    3-89   RB Anthony Allen
    3-91   OG Clint Boling
    4-110  SS Nate Williams
    4-125  FB Owen Marecic

    Obviously it is way to early to mock but this sure shows that we can plug holes and add depth just about everywhere and we haven't even explored 2011 free agents that we could target.
     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    It's really early but Ayers at 12? He'll most likely be a late teen to late 20 area if the college game stopped today. If we can't get one of the top 3 DL with Oak's pick then WR might be the next best option or if something weird should happen and Peterson falls to the Oak's pick I'd rather take the BPA Peterson then reach that high on a pure OLB in college for a 34 system. However if they can get a good trading partner to drop back to the late teen early 20's region get another pick out of it (dropping that far would most likely net a 3rd and maybe a 2nd next year) Ayers would be worth a shot. But I wouldn't take him any higher then 18 if you can get some more picks and still get him.
     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from KyleCleric2. Show KyleCleric2's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    Ayers would be a good OLB. He'll be great at setting the edge and playing pass coverage. I'm worried about his consistency in the pass rush, which is why I would prefer they went elsewhere, perhaps Robert Quinn if we're at the top of the first round or Ryan Kerrigan at the end of the first or begnning of the second or just as a sub-rusher, Von Miller at the end of the 2nd round or in the 3rd round.
     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from KyleCleric2. Show KyleCleric2's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    1st (Raiders): Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU

    1st: Cameron Jordan, DE, California

    2nd (Panthers): Mikel Leshoure, RB, Illinois

    2nd: Ryan Kerrigan, OLB, Purdue

    3rd (Vikings): Titus Young, WR, Boise State

    3rd: Jack Crawford, OLB, Penn State

    4th (Broncos): Marcus Gilbert, OT, Florida

    4th: Clint Boling, G, Georgia

    5th: Evan Royster, RB, Penn State

    5th (compensatory): Tejay Johnson, SS, TCU

    6th (Saints): Greg McElroy, QB, Alabama

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from Pats7393. Show Pats7393's posts

    Re: 2011 Draft

    what about these guys, all three are military reserve and will be back for next season.  There are 2 WRs and 1 FB, the FB if I'm not mistaken was a really good football player. 

     Tyree Barnes WR 6-0 196 4/15/1986 1 Navy Hampton, Va. FA-09
     44Eric Kettani RB 5-11 235 3/26/1987 1 Navy Kirtland, Ohio FA-09
     16Shun White WR 5-8 195 12/9/1985 1 Navy Memphis, Tenn. FA-09

    http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/profile_display.cfm?prospect_id=1587
    On Kettani

    I don't think a RB will be drafted early, I've always loved BJGE and have wanted him to get a shot for a long time.  I think this cat although not flashy is a tough runner and will play every down with a huge chip on his shoulded.  Add Woody who also has a chip and this combo will not be elite but will be solid.  Would like to see a RB added who can be both RB/FB, a big thumper.

    I like Allen Bradford, part of a 4 that's right 4 RB backfield at USC.  Big physical guy, this could be a good value pick.  Because he won't be a fetured back he won't have stats to support a first 3 round selection.  He IMO could be a young Sammy.  He's 5'11" 235 reporterly runs a mid 4.5s, added to BJGE and Woody this kid could be that goal line big boy or FB for BJGE.

    OLB man this one will be tough because IMO there's a dropoff in skill from top three guys to the rest.  Would love to see a few late bloomers as we did last year, Daniel Te'O who went in 3rd round to the Eagles.

    Two guys who could be this year's Te'O
    Markus White 6'4" 262 - Starter at Florida State, has speed to come off the edge but would need time to develop into OLB.
    Ugo Chinasa 6'5" 256 - Arizona player, bit on the light side specially at 6'5" but can add muscle. 

    Would love to get Quinn but that is not going to happen other than Quinn who can make an immediate impact, a 4 down player.  I think that statement "4 down player" will be the theme of the 1st and 2nd round next season.  What about a big ugly,
    Nate Solder 6'8" 315 to man that right side when Voll takes over the left side? 
     
Sections
Shortcuts