• H. Smith - Not sure if he makes it to the back of the second. Most consider him the 2nd best S in the draft. If Barron goes between 15-25 Smith might even sneak into the back end of the 1st. Additionally I don't think he fits well on the Pats. Barron is slightly better in coverage then Chung so you could have them paired next to eachother but Smith and Chung are extremely similar players. Not sure if I'd want them paired up next to eachother.
• S. Kelemete - don't know if I'd want to go a backup G that early. I like Kelemete but I don't see him as a long term starter in the league. They have a couple of guys currently on the roster that they are high on I'd rather use in the backup role to get them reps (ala McDonald)
• No interior DL? I'm not sure I like putting all the eggs into both Fanene and Deadrick being able to be full time starters. I'd feel much more comfortable if they took a Still, Reyes, Wolfe earlier in the draft and pick the best 2 of the three or even have them in rotational. I just think you are putting to much faith in 2 players who haven't proven, yet, they can be full time starters in this system without having a backup plan. It's kind of an anti-BB move.
• McClellin and Branch - BB loves Nin so you have 1 starting position filled. They also picked up Scott who has high upside and they still have Cunningham, Tarp, and Carter. I see them going after (Branch, McClellin, or Curry) early but I can't see them doubling down on OLB's that early

H. Smith - Not sure if he makes it to the back of the second. Most consider him the 2nd best S in the draft. If Barron goes between 15-25 Smith might even sneak into the back end of the 1st. Additionally I don't think he fits well on the Pats. Barron is slightly better in coverage then Chung so you could have them paired next to eachother but Smith and Chung are extremely similar players. Not sure if I'd want them paired up next to eachother.  I agree Smith might not make it to the back of the 2nd.  Someone will reach.  Perhaps the smartest play and the one BB will ultimately do is move McCourty to FS and draft a CB.  There is no doubt in my mind that we have to do more to improve our secondary than signing 34 year old Allen and back-up Gregory.  We can't count on Dowling and Arrington was burned a lot even though he had a lot of picks.  I like Chung but he seems to be injury prone, that's why I thought Smith could be a good addition.  Maybe we'll get lucky and Kirkpatrick will slip to 27.

• S. Kelemete - don't know if I'd want to go a backup G that early. I like Kelemete but I don't see him as a long term starter in the league. They have a couple of guys currently on the roster that they are high on I'd rather use in the backup role to get them reps (ala McDonald)  Pick 94 isn't early IMO.  I actually would prefer to see Cannon at RG more this year. 
• No interior DL? I'm not sure I like putting all the eggs into both Fanene and Deadrick being able to be full time starters. I'd feel much more comfortable if they took a Still, Reyes, Wolfe earlier in the draft and pick the best 2 of the three or even have them in rotational. I just think you are putting to much faith in 2 players who haven't proven, yet, they can be full time starters in this system without having a backup plan. It's kind of an anti-BB move.  BB hasn't been using high picks on the DL of late.  That's a fact.  Even in 2010 when it was deep DT class, and he traded Seymour, he waited until the 7th.  He used a 2nd on Brace in '09 but at the time Wilfork was threatening to not sign the tag and hold out.  Not counting Brace, you have to go back to '04 and Wilfork to find a DL taken in the first 5 rounds.
• McClellin and Branch - BB loves Nin so you have 1 starting position filled. They also picked up Scott who has high upside and they still have Cunningham, Tarp, and Carter. I see them going after (Branch, McClellin, or Curry) early but I can't see them doubling down on OLB's that early.  Depth is needed at OLB.  We have Ninko, Scott and Cunningham.  Both Scott and Cunningham have a horrible track record of staying healthy.  Both are considered more as situational guys too IMO.  We may not double down but the case to do so could be made.

All in all it's very reasonable they could go in the direction you are leaning towards but given the current roster I just can't see some of the players you listed

"The Patriots need athleticism on defense and the ability to rush the passer from the outside," Walker writes. "Branch can help replace the combined 20 sacks New England lost this offseason with the departures of DEs Mark Anderson and Andre Carter."

"Jenkins comes with some character concerns. But New England's strong locker-room leadership will make sure it gets the best out of Jenkins, who has the physical ability to develop into a legit No. 1 corner," Walker writes.