In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


He's getting more desperate by the hour. That's why he lashes out at anybody for the smallest imagined slight.

He used to be thought of as a guy with some actual football knowledge. But as his vendetta against Brady's play and BB's coaching have been confronted, exposed and proven idiotic. He has become more and more shrill and absurd in his attacks on not just them, but other posters.

I mean, what did you do? You simply said you found a simile funny. You didn't even say you agreed with it. But he pounces and tells you to get out more. He is just a desperate troll.

In response to "Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.": I don't understand what your saying. Are you saying that in the remaining 27 minutes of the half 7 1st downs is a good thing? Is that the picture you will try and paint for us?

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


More posts in a month and much more of a life than poor, old Babe Parilli, I can tell you that.

How is me pointing out how unfunny Babe's commentary is, coming at you?

I reference diapers and serial killers because that's what Babe sits in as he channels people with Jeffrey Dahmer traits.  Do you really feel Babe's behavior as an insane Brady fan to this degree is normal for a male in his 60s?

I can see a 10 year old boy, but jesus, dude.  He's got more issues than Dahmer and Gacy combined. 

Nothing he says is funny whatsoever. It's backed by an obsessive agenda to defend Tom Brady on a messageboard.  If I'm 65 and that's what I'm doing, shoot me.

Pathetic.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


When the Giants keep the ball for nearly 17 and a half of those 27 minutes how many 1st downs do you expect we could get in the 9 minutes left to us?

Three of the Giants' four drives in the half lasted 4 and a half minutes or more except the last one where they tore through a collapsed D and scored on them to win it with an almost 3 minute drive.

How is a 4 minute drive that offensive? 4 minutes?  Really? We've come to the point now to overly-dramatize a 4 minute drive?  I can see if they were 5+ minutes, but they weren't.

This doesn't even count the Brady Safety putting the D right back on the field, the INT on first down doing it again or the 3 and out in the second half so needlessly.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


 Thank you!!!  

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Might as well shoot you now because whatever age you are your "obsessive agenda" to trash Brady is worse than any Pats' fan defending him could ever be at any age.

In your insane desire to never admit you are wrong you've become a psychotic troll and you don't even know it.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


No not saying that at all but am wondering why you are leaving out the scoring play to make your point.
Although teams not scoring in the forth quarter is not ideal, it is also not un usual.
They scored on 38% of their possessions regardless of when, which is above the norm.  Would it have been better if they scored once each in each of the last 3 quarters and not the first quarter.  No it wouldn't.
The point is they would have had to score on at least 50% of their drives (3 Td's and 1 Fg) to win.  Doesn't matter which quarter.
What matters is, since the D gave up 50% scoring drives, they had to match or surpass that to win. 

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Is this a serious question?



Perhaps petty insults have become such second nature to you that you don't realize what you are saying, but that is in it of itself pretty sad.  Also the fact that you are comparing someone posting about football on an internet message board to a serial killer/sex offender is pretty f'ing strange man.  Get some perspective.  Maybe if you stuck to more generic name calling you might not get banned as much...

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


It's not obsessive at all. I watch the games and react. Could it be he's not as good as you think he is more often than not? Oh, I think so, Mr. Psychopants!

According to you, he's outstanding in every game, especially in the postseason.

Tell us, lunatic with the Brady Doll market cornered: DOes your precious QBR factor in taking Safeties, game management, making excuses, god awful 1st down INTs, 3 and outs, etc?

Does it?

Until you and your band of overly-sensitive dorks here drop it, you'll keep perpetuating this elephant in the room and that's #12 and how he runs this offense.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Of course you are correct. The problem is that these few jabronis think a defense unable to get off the field and allowing long drives which keeps the overall score down is good defense. It's not. It's actually playing into the other guy's hands because they want to keep our strength, the offense, off the field.

Look 2 guys here are trying to tell us that McD and BB are not trying to use the run more, that the 90-33 pass to run ratio in the 2 SB's was the defense's fault, that the Fb's and 2nd,3rd rd Rb's in camp do not mean that we realize we need to use the run more, that Brady didn't just say, we need a 4 minute offense. That Brady did not say we need to take the run when the defense gives it to us. Despite what we are all witnessing with our own 2 eyes they are refusing to acknowledge the problem. 

Lets see here.....135 passes to 55 rushes in 3 losses in a row to the gints= the defense's fault....even though we were playing with a lead in all 3 games, even though the defense was the 2nd best ppg allowed defense in the post season this past SB. The 15.5 points per game scored in our last 2 SB's is not the offense's fault? LMAO

Hopeless conclusions by 2 guys grasping at straws.
 
I am done with this as it is finally starting to irritate me which is the objective of at least one poster here.

Looking forward to this season, to McD bringing back an offense that is no longer one dimensional, to Brady hitting the open guy as opposed to just the big 3. To our offense utilizing TOP and keeping our defense off the field.

I'm looking forward to complimentary football, something we have not had in the Bill Obrien era.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Yes, it's a serious question.  If you think that is funny, I'd suggest maybe renting some stand up on Netflix or something. I don't think an old man who is selfish, ruining this board, is funny. 

You know who he reminds me of? That old dork Butch from the Cape on WEEI from the 1990s and early 2000s.

Some guy from NY who would call up WEEI all smug and arrogant because he was from NY so he knew better, etc.  He had no friends, no life, nothing. He harped and harped and harped about how the Yankees were so superior and this and that until he was blue in the face. Then he died of cancer, all along and pathetic.  That was his life.  He also missed his Yankees choke off the series of a century in 2004. Again, what a shame.

So, us witnessing Babe Parilli's pychotic behavior displayed here, as he defends Tom Brady to the hilt, is somehow not reminiscent of serial killer behavior, and it's strange? I'd say the troll or Babe behavior here is an open window to people with mental illness. Yep. Any therapist could come on here and see Babe's Chatty Kathy wind up act and immediately point to Passive Aggressive Disorder, likely Bi-Polar disorder, and that's just for starters.

I would say anyone who behaves like Babe does has mental illness, it's just a matter of how severe and if it's treatable. Clearly, something in his life ain't right for him to be this obssessive in defense of Brady. Clearly. 

What's strange is a 65 year old man, who may or may not have multiple Brady dolls in his apartment as a single man, constantly and wildly defending an NFL QB's subpar play.  That's what's strange. Dahmer killed cats and squirrels for entertainment, Babe Parilli somehow has thoushands of posts here attacking Pats fans who aren't 100% enamored with #12.

That's what strange. I don't have any relative (uncle or aunt) at his age remotely obsessed with Brady to the point they can't be honest or objective with what they see on an NFL football field. I see 10 year olds crying who love Brady, but that's what kids do, so that's understandable. They're kids.  Babe Parilli is an admitted 65 year old elderly person.  I might feel sorry for him if he wasn't so obnoxious.

This is a sickness he has.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


No stupido. I never said that. I said he was not good at all passing against the Raven's top rated pass D. I said the INT to Gronk was bad, as all INTs are bad unless there is a tip issue or something. As far as the safety, he is far less at fault than his blockers were.

But what I know and what you don't is that you have to look at the overall performance and overall he has been good in the postseason and great during the regular season. You fixate on any mistake and give no credit for the production as if that's a given and doesn't count.

Meanwhile you ignore every bad aspect of the play of the rest of the entire team and blame Brady for everything. You are a kook.

I don't ignore the other aspects whatsoever.  I laugh at you wildly defending our BEST PLAYER at 20 mil per not playing like one when he had a chance to atone for SB 42.

He didn't.

Eli Manning has outplayed him twice in the SB and it's really mostly about how Brady played, not how Eli played.

Hurts.   Accept it and move on like a big boy.  We can't have average QB play and expect to win SBs in this era. 

Lmao.  Rusty tells me I need to get out more because I disagree with him.  I tell him I don't understand why he felt the need to come at me.  He asks how he is coming at me.  I quote him where he tells me to get out more (which is coming at me) and he responds with telling me to get out more.  Is anyone else seeing this?  Can anyone be this f'ing stupid?  Then again we are talking about the same person that insists on comparing posting about football on an internet message board about football to a serial killer and killing animals for fun.  Some people have no perspective.

2 guys telling us what Brady REALLY meant as opposed to what he actually said.

2 guys in complete denial that Josh McDaniel's is doing anything different than Bill O'Brien even though 27 rushes from our backs, screen passes and I-Formation were occurrences more rare than Loch Ness sightings during OBie's tenure.

There's always excuses for these guys, obscure stat's that point to the defense every time as the boogeyman.  Even when they run the ball heavily last night there's an ulterior motive...

Just admit you were wrong, that O'Brien stunk the joint up in the playoff's and that Josh McDaniel is bringing balance back to the offense, something that we've been yelling for over the past 4 years.

The first step is admitting you were wrong, then you'll be able to enjoy the rest of the season and we can all move on.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:



Right trollboy. A Pats' fan defending the greatest player in team history who just played one of the greatest seasons in NFL history is reminicent of a serial killer.



You are absolutely....

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


How would Brady have done against our vaunted 31st ranked defense numbnuts?

Lets see here.....135 passes to 55 rushes in 3 losses in a row to the gints= the defense's fault....even though we were playing with a lead in all 3 games, even though the defense was the 2nd best ppg allowed defense in the post season this past SB. The 15.5 points per game scored in our last 2 SB's is not the offense's fault? LMAO

All 8 possession games by a team whose game plan was to limit possessions and not give up the ball against a weak D. in order to keep the high powered O off the field for much of the game, causing them to become one dimensional.
YES! 
See Parcells game plan, Jints/ Bills Super Bowl.   It's very well documented.
Also notice the Offensive coordinator at that time.  Same guy that went against the Defensive coordinator all day, every day in practice.
He might have a clue as to how to beat a BB defense.  Ya think?

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


About the same. He would have had more yardage if he didn't toss more INTs on 1st downs.  bawahahaah

Yardage allowed never meant so little as it did last year in terms of where a D "ranked".

The Giants D, was ranked, a measly 4 spots higher at 27, Einstein. You're going to tell me a 27th "ranking" is somehow that much different?

Face it, Eli didn't throw a pick, throw high to Manningham with a big play needed, and he didn't take a Safety, nor did he refuse to lean on a lead back to establish some version of a run game.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


2011 for Brady was "one of the greatest"? Why is that? I had no idea folding in a 4th qtr of a SB, not winning an MVP like he did in 2007 or 2010, means he had "one of the greatest seasons" in NFL history.

The fact you think his 2011 is one of the greatest, proves my point. You're so beyond help and able to be objective as a guy who lives in a bubble in the Boston area, there is no point in really ever reading your blather here.

You and Davedsone want blather, read what you slap here, Gramps.

My god.

Yeah, Brady's 2011, a season where he was bordering on his worst INT rate of his entire career, coupled with an awful AFC title game (again) and an average SB is "one of the greatest seasons ever".

SEEK HELP

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Why don't you admit that OB had an injured BJGE out for half the year and two babies for running backs last year.  One of those who was also out for most of the season.
 McD has a slight advantage as they are no longer injured and babies.
If they are used more this season, it's because the D can hold a lead and doesn't put them in a hole so that they are forced to pass the whole second half of every game,.

In Response to Re: 5 Questions from Kirwan and his camp visit on Sunday.:


Everybody with a brain, that leaves you out, knows the Giants' D was hampered by injuries and got much better by playoff time. They allowed the least ppg in the playoffs dum bass.

They pretty much made the MVP look like Sanchez in their game against the Pack.