...All this does is prove my point that you are one sided, what works for Bush doesn’t work for Obama.
No, I told you I did not give Bush a pass on this. I blame Bush for laying in a course, and Obama for engaging warp drive!
...And by the way incase you missed it Obama did not come out with the bailout plan all by himself. If you remember John McCain put his stamp all over it as well so it was a joint effort...
McCain's support is reinforcement of my belief that he is a RINO. I voted for him as the lesser of two evils. So c rap on him all you want.
...but how quickly that gets forgotten when you want to smear Obama with bull sh*it..
I was not smearing Obama with excrement. The man is spending like there is no tomorrow. This is a valid criticism. Are you telling me that his spending is a good thing?
You can hope all you want my friend it will never happen. You can not force your values on the rest of us.
I'm not trying to force my values on anyone. It's a fact that polls show MOST Americans believe that abortion is murder. Liberals know that they must keep this issue in the courts because if it ever gets to the people, it will be defeated. So we'll see what happens.
You are against abortion because it goes against your religion...
I'm against abortion because it's wrong. Some choices are just wrong. I'm also against it because I love kids and see them as the future.
...You ask me why no outrage over the 50,000,000+ deaths in the womb? It is a simple answer I am pro choice 100% I would go into it but it is pointless all that matters in the end is I am pro choice and you are pro life its not like you will some how change my mind so I will just say that I am pro choice and that’s why that does not bother me.
Is that the end of the debate? Why no explanation of why you think people in the womb deseve no protection? Why don't they have any rights? You want gays to have rights, why not the innocent? Why is a woman's right to convenience more important to someone else's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? It's either a person or it is not. I can line up just as many doctors and scientists that believe it is a person as you can for the other viewpoint. So why not err on the side of life, just in case. All your arguments for rights of gays, soldiers dying for no good reason show that there is hipocracy if you can't stand up for the innocent. I have 4 kids. If any of their lives were threatened, I would not think twice about giving up my life for them. It's a no-brainer. However, nowadays, people don't give another person (in the womb) a second thought before they abort a baby. ok, maybe they do think about it, but over 50,000,000 times, convenience, lifestyle, hate of children, etc, etc, etc wins out. This is the ultimate selfishness. Not aborting does have challenges. But state sponsored murder happens daily. I cannot fathom how someone who is pro-gay rights, can't see this. No disrespect, but I have to say it is hypocritical.
...that’s better then lying his way into a war.
Take a look at this link. It shows how the Iraqis buried fighter jets into the desert. Do you think, if they could bury jets in the sand, that they would have a problem burrying barrels in it? he had demonstrated the capability of making WMD by killing numerous Kurds with chemicals. You can say he lied if you want, but at worst, it was a misinterpretation of the intelligence (which many democrats saw and believed in the existence of WMD). http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/sandplanes.asp
...I don’t think it is hypocritical what so ever to be honest I don’t see how one has to do with another.
Is this because you don't believe that people in the womb are not actually people?
Hey if that helps you look past the fact that he played you and all the other religious people he tricked into voting for him then all the power to you. But he played you man, like a con man. He gave you just enough to make you happy like with the SC Justices but he never really gave you exactly what you thought he would.
If he did, it's probably not the last time I will be played. I wasn't expecting him to get a Constitutional Amendment passed. Overturning Roe v Wade would have been nice, which is where the SCJ come in. So I'm ok with it, even though I think he could have done more (which is why I said i had an issue with him on it).
And boy am I glad he didn’t, there is no need to bring religion into government.
So I guess all Christians have to check their Christianity at the door? When was the last time a democrat checked their secular humanism at the door? You can't ask a religious person to not be religious once they enter the Capitol. It's part of who they are. if they check it at the door, then they are fakes. BTW, did you know that our form of government is based on the Bible?For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us.
Once again we are not the Holy Empire of America..
No argument there.
..and he nor should any other president ever let their personal religious beliefs interfere..
How is it interference? Because you don't agree with it? Like I said, religious beliefs are part of who you are, how you think, and what judgements you make. i could no more ask you to stop believing what you believe.
...But Al Gore would have done a fine job in my opinion.
Copy your opinion. My opinion is that he would not have. Thanks God we'll never know.
...his dad was president for Christ sake of course he pulled some strings for his kid.
He had already graduated by the time Daddy was president.
Could you please give me an example of this?
Yes, I heard him talking about religion and the Bible. He was taking the Bible completely out of context, trying to make his point. By his responses, you could tell, if you know a little about the Bible, that his knowledge concerning it is limited. Talking about the Bible in a disingenuous way, frosts my cupcakes. I can't listen to the guy. If you get something out of watching him, go for it. To me, he's a fake.
Maybe because I don’t have millions of people listening to me like I speak the word of god the way Rush does? I can say something mean and outlandish because I am talking amongst friends on the internet where maybe 50 people will read what I say and none of whom will take anything I say to heart. Rush however has a crazy big fan base full of people who take what he says seriously and that’s what makes it different. If I had a huge public forum the way he does I wouldn’t have said what I said to you in my last post. Because I know it is not ok to say something like over the air waves.
But you believe it. Rush is saying what he believes (like I said, if he in fact said it). Just because you wouldn't say it in front of millions is irrelevant. So you may have more tact than Rush.. So what? You still believe he should die and hope someone takes him out. There is no difference deep down inside between the two of you (except that he's a con and your a lib).
but Rush Limbaugh might as well go back in time and work for Nazi Germany...
I consider abortion US Naziism.
Hmmmm not take over the world? They might hate American’s and want to see our country burn to the ground...
That's because we're the ones standing in their way.
...An assumption? Ok then where are the WMD’s he said Iraq had hidden from the UN? Where are they?
See above link. Iraq is a big place. Lots of sand. Plenty of hiding places. My guess would be Syria.
...he lied...he lied...He lied...a bold faced lie...He lied...
Are you saying you believe he lied????lol Just because you repeat it over and over, it doesn't make it true.
Did Bush ever catch Bin Ladan? Nope
We do have him on the run, living out of caves, eating desert rats, looking over his back.
That is against my freedom so for someone so concerned about our freedom and spreading it around the world you seem to be perfectly fine with giving up our freedom.
Sometimes you have to give up some freedoms so other freedoms can be assured. you have to weigh the risks. I would rather have my phone conversations monitored than allow another 3000+ Americans die in a terrorist attack. Is what your saying on the phone more important than their lives?
One problem at a time. This is an insane answer.
You act like oh it’s not such a big deal that he lied.
If I believed he lied, it would be a big deal. It is a foregone conclusion for you. Not so for me.
I bet you were all for going after Clinton for lying about a blow job...
Of course, because that was proven.
...but Bush lying about WMDs...he lied...he lied and people died how is that ok?
Posted by MVPkilla
Why has nobody in the media come up with concrete evidence as you so suggest?