Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    TFBiatch12 has hated the PATS ever since they let his little Wessie walk after he demanded that they never would let it happen back in March 2013.  Poor poor TFBiatch12........I see he's getting crushed these last few weeks over his lack of interest in the PATS successes and only wants to fight with all of the posters here. He must be exhausted.....LOL! Its a hell of a way to spend in the wake of a HUGE victory against the Ravens. What a dork........LOL! You reading this TFBiatch12???? HAHAHAHAHA!!!

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    Bumped

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    In response to RallyC's comment:

    It is so sad to see someone who says "he" is a PATRIOTS fan outright attack PATRIOTS players in defense of a player from another team. Is that a true PATRIOTS fan?????? NO WAY! TFBiatch12 is a fraud, and is in love with players who are with the enemy. How can that be a true PATS fan??? Run his azz off rtuinila!!!



    See RallyC, that is why you are a fraud.  You think it's about Welker... It has always been about how this team would be better with him here.  Amendola has not done anything you said he was going to do here.  You can not deny that this team could very possibly be sitting in the drivers seat in the #1 position with the road to the SB going through NE had Welker been here instead of Amendola.  Instead, the Pats could very possibly have to go to Denver to play for the AFCC, something many people were afraid of last season.  It's still very possible the Pats could end up without a bye sitting in the #3 or even the #4 seed.  It's all about what would give this team the best chance to win.  Certainly swapping out Welker for Amendola this season has not done that.  There are at least 2 games the Pats probably would have won had Welker been here instead of Amendola.  Just as I predicted, which you failed with in your predictions, Amendola has not been the better choice.

    BTW, where were you last season when this forum was cheering the Ravens on to beat Denver so the Pats didn't have to face Denver in Denver?  I don't recall seeing you around last year.   

    Maybe you just jumped on the bandwagon this season after following the Celtics and posting on the Celtics forum.  I bet that's it.  That is why you made up the lame "I played for the CFL" comments, along with trying to impress everyone with all your other bogus claims about how much you could lift, how fast you could run comments.  All just a way to get people to buy into you being a Pats fan.  Many here have called you out on your ridiculous claims, and your lack of football knowledge.

    So instead of following me around, calling me names, trying to save yourself from that embarrassing goodbye thread you made while having your mid life crisis meltdown here that I caused you, why don't you talk some football?  I know why, because you don't know anything about it.  Your silly, failed predictions prove it. And so does this little gem from another poster here who has exposed you as a fraud.

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    In response to NYPatsFan12's comment:

    tfb12 is crumbling




    Is that what it is? I can't read his posts, but I see he is rapid firing posts all over the place. Time we send this fraud back to where he came from for good............stupid fool.....He needs to either support the team and celebrate their accomplishments and victories instead of constantly trying to minimize the accomplishments of our favorite team's players, or go be a Broncos fan, and our arch nemesis. Can't be both and say that you are here and expect to get away with it. This is a NE Patriots FAN forum, not a Troll forum where fruads infiltrate to earn trust just to breed demise and discontent amongst the fan base. That is the ultimate goal of a troll. What a dork this TFBIATCH12 "guy" is........Either GO PATS!!! or GO HOME!

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from IrishMob7. Show IrishMob7's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    In response to ATJ's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to IrishMob7's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to ATJ's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to NCPatsFan1971's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    The Patriots played their best all around game of the year against a team that has given us trouble in the past.  We embarrass and totally out played the Ravens in their own house and you guys are still arguing about Welker vs. Amendola.  This is @#$%^&*ing  pathetic. 

    [/QUOTE]

    Which would seem to indicate that the argument is less about New England Patriots football and more about who is right.  I don't give a flying f**k if Welker catches 300 passes for 2,954 in a single season and Amendola catches 1 for 2.5 yards - if the Pats win I'm happy.

    [/QUOTE]


    What?!?!?! ATJ, I normally like your posts, but this is ridiculous.  We should ALWAYS be critical of our team.  We sux.  Almost as much as BB as GM

    [/QUOTE]

    Irish, like my posts, don't like them, my friend.  I'm not entirely certain you've ever seen me post anywhere that we as fans shouldn't be critical of our team where criticism is warranted.  What my comment was about was not the NE Pats but about this incessant 'I'm right - no I'm right' bu11sh!t about Amendola and Welker.  The Pats just came away with a huge win against a team that is very tough to beat and what do we see?  Amendola vs Welker.  Is it ok, just once, if we dispense with this stuff and be happy that the Pats won when they needed to?

    That's all I'm saying. 

    [/QUOTE]

    Woah.  I think my failed attempt at sarcasm wasn't detected.  I agree wholeheartedly with your previous post.  I apologize for the confusion

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Amendola had more catches then Welker again!

    In response to RallyC's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to NYPatsFan12's comment:

    [QUOTE]

     

    tfb12 is crumbling

     

    [/QUOTE]


     

    Is that what it is? I can't read his posts, but I see he is rapid firing posts all over the place. Time we send this fraud back to where he came from for good............stupid fool.....He needs to either support the team and celebrate their accomplishments and victories instead of constantly trying to minimize the accomplishments of our favorite team's players, or go be a Broncos fan, and our arch nemesis. Can't be both and say that you are here and expect to get away with it. This is a NE Patriots FAN forum, not a Troll forum where fruads infiltrate to earn trust just to breed demise and discontent amongst the fan base. That is the ultimate goal of a troll. What a dork this TFBIATCH12 "guy" is........Either GO PATS!!! or GO HOME!

    [/QUOTE]


    That might be a wise thing to not read my posts because you are being exposed as a fraud and it might cause you another giant meltdown again.  But my guess is, of course you are reading my posts.  All your mini meltdowns are showing that as well as you jumping on here to post everytime I do.

    I didn't see you here last season.  Did anyone else?  You must be a new Pats fan. 

    Do you mind adressing this...

    See RallyC, that is why you are a fraud.  You think it's about Welker... It has always been about how this team would be better with him here.  Amendola has not done anything you said he was going to do here.  You can not deny that this team could very possibly be sitting in the drivers seat in the #1 position with the road to the SB going through NE had Welker been here instead of Amendola.  Instead, the Pats could very possibly have to go to Denver to play for the AFCC, something many people were afraid of last season.  It's still very possible the Pats could end up without a bye sitting in the #3 or even the #4 seed.  It's all about what would give this team the best chance to win.  Certainly swapping out Welker for Amendola this season has not done that.  There are at least 2 games the Pats probably would have won had Welker been here instead of Amendola.  Just as I predicted, which you failed with in your predictions, Amendola has not been the better choice.

    BTW, where were you last season when this forum was cheering the Ravens on to beat Denver so the Pats didn't have to face Denver in Denver?  I don't recall seeing you around last year.   

    Maybe you just jumped on the bandwagon this season after following the Celtics and posting on the Celtics forum.  I bet that's it.  That is why you made up the lame "I played for the CFL" comments, along with trying to impress everyone with all your other bogus claims about how much you could lift, how fast you could run comments.  All just a way to get people to buy into you being a Pats fan.  Many here have called you out on your ridiculous claims, and your lack of football knowledge.

    So instead of following me around, calling me names, trying to save yourself from that embarrassing goodbye thread you made while having your mid life crisis meltdown here that I caused you, why don't you talk some football?  I know why, because you don't know anything about it.  Your silly, failed predictions prove it. And so does this little gem from another poster here who has exposed you as a fraud.

    OWNED!!

     

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share