Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to Patsfansince1966's comment:

    And if Denver or KC has a better record and the Pats have to play them, they have to go THERE.

     

    Idiot.  



    This is wrong, of course. Here's a scenario: KC wins the West at 15-1 and Denver, also 15-1, loses in a tie breaker so they're the first wild card team; and let's say the Colts win their division at 9-7 and have the worst record of the four division winners. Denver would be the fifth seed (the other wild card team would be the sixth) and they would play at fourth seed Indy.

    NO MATTER WHAT, they play on the road against any division winner.  The only chance they have at a home game in the playoffs is if they happen to meet the other wild card team in the AFCCG.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonSportsFan111. Show BostonSportsFan111's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    In response to Patsfansince1966's comment:

    And if Denver or KC has a better record and the Pats have to play them, they have to go THERE.

     

    Idiot.  



    This is wrong, of course. Here's a scenario: KC wins the West at 15-1 and Denver, also 15-1, loses in a tie breaker so they're the first wild card team; and let's say the Colts win their division at 9-7 and have the worst record of the four division winners. Denver would be the fifth seed (the other wild card team would be the sixth) and they would play at fourth seed Indy.

    NO MATTER WHAT, they play on the road against any division winner.  The only chance they have at a home game in the playoffs is if they happen to meet the other wild card team in the AFCCG.



    SSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH... (the 'patsfansince1966' is working on the cure for autism)...

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from danemcmenamin. Show danemcmenamin's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to Patsfansince1966's comment:

    It's funny that they are raving about Atkins, while Chris Jones (a nobody) has as many sacks as Atkins.



    LOL....do you know who Vince Wilfork is? He doesn't get a huge number of sacks but he does OK

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonSportsFan111. Show BostonSportsFan111's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    No... Atkins is better than the South Beach...

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    "NO MATTER WHAT, they play on the road against any division winner.  The only chance they have at a home game in the playoffs is if they happen to meet the other wild card team in the AFCCG."

    So basically Patsfan1966 was totally and completely wrong then, that's what it's amounts to. So, instead of admitting it, he falls back on "the playoffs aren't starting today" - lol

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from danemcmenamin. Show danemcmenamin's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to Patsfansince1966's comment:

    In response to danemcmenamin's comment:

     


    LOL....do you know who Vince Wilfork is? He doesn't get a huge number of sacks but he does OK



    You're saying Atkins is better than wilfork?  That's hilarious.



    No i didn't say that it's a decent enough comparison though...you can be delusional and think otherwise if you want. Judging a DT by there stat statistic is stupid....especially in the 4-3 that they play in

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from patsbandwagonsince76. Show patsbandwagonsince76's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to joepatsfan111111's comment:


    Cincy is a totally different animal on the road. they are like like jekyll & hyde. and now the loss of Geno Adtkins is like a bigger loss to them than us to Vince. i think given the shot again the pats could beat this team at home or on the road..



    I actually thought after the loss to them that I hope the Pats face them in the playoffs. The Patriots played terrible and they would be cocky if we met them again. Well, I still feel that way but actually think the PAtriots match up man to man much better now with their injury situation.

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from pcmIV. Show pcmIV's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to Patsfansince1966's comment:

    Why not, every one here IS delusional.



    So why do you read or post here?  It takes a special kind of stupid to complain about the stupidity of the people you choose to interact with on a message board.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from raptor64d. Show raptor64d's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

    In response to rkarp's comment:


    isnt it funny when a poster is wrong, they change the topic rather than admit they are wrong? changing the topic and throwing insults does not deflect the fact that you are wrong...go ahead and throw more insults, but you are still wrong. man up about it 




    Dude I am afraid for patsfansince1866 because he really sounds like an unstable whack job.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from IndyTony. Show IndyTony's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...



    Manic phase?...Delusions of grandeur?...Seek help

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from IndyTony. Show IndyTony's posts

    Re: Bengals Lose - and lose Geno Atkins...

     

    Noun 1. delusions of grandeur - a delusion (common in paranoia) that you are much greater and more powerful and influential than you really are

    hope this helps

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share