In response to rkarp's comment:

I was surprised that Landry was able to stay on the field and that he played so well. Not that it is the end all be all, but he was selected for the pro bowl.

Gregory, while I was not a fan of the signing, performed below even my most modest expectations. He is too small, too slow and misreads pass plays. He is the classic tweener for a S. Chung is the better athlete than Gregory, Gregory the smarter player, but both fall whort as a S in the NFL in this passing league.

Landry was better than epected against the pass, and was very good against the run. I think he is a risky signing due to injury concern.

To argue that Gregory had a better year then Landry is simply foolish, but not surprising given the source

So, Landry was great and Gregory was bad? Gotcha.

Do you really expect people here, after your embarrassing pro Jets stance and odd behavior to take your analysis seriously?

At least Gregory could cover better than Landry.  Landry was busy looking at the back of jerseys all year with Yeremiah Bell.  And no, I don't think Gregory was a difference maker, but this premise that Landry was better is hilarious.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to rkarp's comment:

I was surprised that Landry was able to stay on the field and that he played so well. Not that it is the end all be all, but he was selected for the pro bowl.

Gregory, while I was not a fan of the signing, performed below even my most modest expectations. He is too small, too slow and misreads pass plays. He is the classic tweener for a S. Chung is the better athlete than Gregory, Gregory the smarter player, but both fall whort as a S in the NFL in this passing league.

Landry was better than epected against the pass, and was very good against the run. I think he is a risky signing due to injury concern.

To argue that Gregory had a better year then Landry is simply foolish, but not surprising given the source

So, Landry was great and Gregory was bad? Gotcha.

Do you really expect people here, after your embarrassing pro Jets stance and odd behavior to take your analysis seriously?

At least Gregory could cover better than Landry.  Landry was busy looking at the back of jerseys all year with Yeremiah Bell.  And no, I don't think Gregory was a difference maker, but this premise that Landry was better is hilarious.

Yes.  When one safety has 3 times as many tackles as another for the same price, they are not even in the same universe. 

I'd be ticked off if my SS had that many tackles 10+ yards down the field. Leave it you to think that it's a strength.

What a moron. Oh my.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

In response to rkarp's comment:

I was surprised that Landry was able to stay on the field and that he played so well. Not that it is the end all be all, but he was selected for the pro bowl.

Gregory, while I was not a fan of the signing, performed below even my most modest expectations. He is too small, too slow and misreads pass plays. He is the classic tweener for a S. Chung is the better athlete than Gregory, Gregory the smarter player, but both fall whort as a S in the NFL in this passing league.

Landry was better than epected against the pass, and was very good against the run. I think he is a risky signing due to injury concern.

To argue that Gregory had a better year then Landry is simply foolish, but not surprising given the source

So, Landry was great and Gregory was bad? Gotcha.

Do you really expect people here, after your embarrassing pro Jets stance and odd behavior to take your analysis seriously?

At least Gregory could cover better than Landry.  Landry was busy looking at the back of jerseys all year with Yeremiah Bell.  And no, I don't think Gregory was a difference maker, but this premise that Landry was better is hilarious.

Yes.  When one safety has 3 times as many tackles as another for the same price, they are not even in the same universe. 

I'd be ticked off if my SS had that many tackles 10+ yards down the field. Leave it you to think that it's a strength.

What a moron. Oh my.

Yes, Queenie, I'm livid. So, what you're saying here is that Seattle, Washington, Pitt, Miami, Baltimore & San Diego had a bad run Ds because they had a safety with 100 tackles?  Oh god, you're an idiot. 

Where do you get this mystical number of "10 yards down the field"?

Yes, you should be livid. Your team sucked in 2012 and is getting worse.

SDs D sucked.  Ray Lewis made a gazillion tackles 5+ yards down the field all year, as did Pollard. It's not like their D was lights out or even greay in the postseason.  28 points in Denver and 34 in the SB isn't very good.

Seattle's SS wasn't making tackles 10 yards downfield either. That was a good D this past year. As usual, you're wrong, combining contexts.

Enjoy pretending Landry and Bell, unable to cover or play well in the box was actually a reality for the Jets in 2012. lol

Everyone saw how weak the Jets mid field coverage was this year. The tackles that should have been made up front or at the second level, ended up happening with a roid rager named LaRon Landry.

Whopdee-doo.

In response to mia76's comment:

Some interesting vets being cut for cap reasons all over the league. I find this move really surprising considering they have a fair amount of cap space already and Wilson is a pretty good player. It suggests to me that they may well go hard for Jets Landrey. Seems like a poor trade off even given the PB for Landrey.

Yes, Pats should be interested especially if his price is less than 2.9M!

I'd much rather have Wilson than Landry.  Landry does't really care about winning and he can't cover at all past 10 yards.

In response to rkarp's comment:

Please face facts, Gregory was not a good player this year. Landry, even though he wore green, was the much better safety.

Thats why it is boring comingt onto these boards when you are on. You turn everything anti Jet, yet when someone like myself makes an unbiased comment that yes, a Jet player could have had a good year, you go nutty...

You have to face facts, even a player wearing a green jersey could have a good year...Landry did have a good year...and at $3million he was a bargain. Gregory, not so much on all counts.

Your troll buddy, Phat Rex, turned it into a Jets debate, not me, moron. Why are seriously so stupid?  There is no way on earth you have a undergrad from Tufts and a masters from Harvard. You don't even have a high school degree.

Go to the source. You're each worthless little Jets fan dweebs.   It's hard to tell who is worse at this point.

Landry certainly wasn't any better than Gregory.  Sorry. The roid flexing and tattoos, if that's what you care about, sure.  Gregory actually played within the system and was a steady presence. But, Landry wasn't "better" at similar money.

Was Gregory running down the field or across the field trying to stop 40 yard plays? No.

In response to rkarp's comment:

Please face facts, Gregory was not a good player this year. Landry, even though he wore green, was the much better safety.

Thats why it is boring comingt onto these boards when you are on. You turn everything anti Jet, yet when someone like myself makes an unbiased comment that yes, a Jet player could have had a good year, you go nutty...

You have to face facts, even a player wearing a green jersey could have a good year...Landry did have a good year...and at $3million he was a bargain. Gregory, not so much on all counts.

Your troll buddy, Phat Rex, turned it into a Jets debate, not me, moron. Why are seriously so stupid?  There is no way on earth you have a undergrad from Tufts and a masters from Harvard. You don't even have a high school degree.

Go to the source. You're each worthless little Jets fan dweebs.   It's hard to tell who is worse at this point.

Landry certainly wasn't any better than Gregory.  Sorry. The roid flexing and tattoos, if that's what you care about, sure.  Gregory actually played within the system and was a steady presence. But, Landry wasn't "better" at similar money.

Was Gregory running down the field or across the field trying to stop 40 yard plays? No.

Personally, I think it's highlarious Landry took a 1 year deal and was overpaid in NY, but stayed healthy.

He now used the Jets.  Gee, another player to use the Jets stupidity for selfish reasons. Priceless.

9 starters to replace in NY this offseason = Screwed for 2013 and beyond

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to ClarkGriswold's comment:

Personally, I think it's highlarious Landry took a 1 year deal and was overpaid in NY, but stayed healthy.

He now used the Jets.  Gee, another player to use the Jets stupidity for selfish reasons. Priceless.

9 starters to replace in NY this offseason = Screwed for 2013 and beyond

I didn't bring up any comparison between Landry and a Pats player. That was you. You then insecurely contended it was BETTER for a Safety to have more tackles than a LB. LOL

We can't talk any FAs on this board even if they are on the Jets, Mr. Arrogant? Is that your contention, Jeffrey?

PS The more teams that look to sign a player, the higher the price it is to sign a player. It's not a "claim". It's called supply and demand, moron.

You might learn that freshman year in college if you ever get there.

Oh, I see.  So because you brought up Landry and claimed that he was a bad signing because he was overpaid and had poor production and didn't want to win and I bashed you in the face with the facts about Landry, I turned it into a Jets debate?  

Tell me, who brought up the Jets after bringing up Landry?

Oh queenie, bludgeoned again.  Do you ever quit?

landry is very overrated....id rather have gregory than landry.....we already have seen enough of pat chung, landry would be a clone of him. as far as wilson goes, i wouldnt be opposed to it. seems like a good player and a good teammate.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

In response to redsoxfan94's comment:

landry is very overrated....id rather have gregory than landry.....we already have seen enough of pat chung, landry would be a clone of him. as far as wilson goes, i wouldnt be opposed to it. seems like a good player and a good teammate.

Of course you would, Quennie Jr.  All idiots would rather a guy that can't tackle and was a part of a bottom rated pass defense over a guy with 100 tackles on a topped ranked pass D.

Show me a SB winning team that has one or both of the following:

1. A CB who is at 12+ mil per.

2. A Safety who has as many tackles as the leading tackler on the front 7.

The idea is to not let the guy with the ball into the secondary. 

LMAO

Good luck, dilspank.

In response to pcmIV's comment:

Rodney Harrison had over 140 tackles for us in 2004 Rusty.  Landry is overrated though.  Gregory sucked for most of last season.

Right, but he was used at the line more than Landry and wasn't overpaid.  Those tackles weren't made well past the line of scrimmage either.

Did you just compare Landry to Harrison? The reading comprehension worsens.   Since when is the 2004 Pats D comparable to the 2012 Jets D? Unreal.

Garbage tackles aren't impact tackles.   Keep in mind I am not prasing Gregory at all, but talking about NY renting Landry for no reason other than Landry's benefit.

We could sit here all day long and count the Safeties who collect tackles on good teams and bad.  Was Rodney on a 26th ranked run D? Nope.

I know you're in your early 20s, but please do not enable Jets trolls. It's very annoying.