BJE Signs with the Bengles

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]Yeah, right.  BJGE had one good year due to Crumpler (who wasn't on the field much) with Gronk and Hernandez here, and without ol Logie "Roadgrader" Mankins to run behind.  Right, Crumpler and Gronk made BJGE, not the idea that we changed our ideolog midseason last year. Okie dokie. BJGE had a great year because BB dealt Brady's binky (Moss), and after Week 4, they committed more to a run base/play action type of a gameplan.  Did anyone watch the difference in the team in 2010 pre and post Moss? I did. Brady also didn't thrown any INTS after that. Hmmm.
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    Spin it dum bass.

    Bottom line: BB just ditched your great RB. LOLOLOL
     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from nyjoseph. Show nyjoseph's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : Lol!  And this comes from the guy who wants Brady to fingerbangg him? Brady makes 20 million per year, 3 times the amount he made in 2009 with the same cap number and is WORSE now than he was when he trotted around with 3 rings on his fingers. You just can't stay out of your own way, can you?
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    Elway was "worse" than his earlier, prolific days when he won his 2 SBs at the end of his career.  The difference was he had a beast at RB in Davis.
     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BassFishing. Show BassFishing's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    Actually, he was better than throwing INTs and choking in big games. You just proved my point. THere was nothing "prolific" about Elway looking like a horesetoothed bozo in bright orange, laying horrendous eggs in SB.

    Currently, we have our own QB that is prolific int he regular season too and now looks like early years Elway when it counts.

    Not what I want.  I don't know any Pats fan that would. I am a Pats fan before I'm a Brady fan.
     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from nyjoseph. Show nyjoseph's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]Actually, he was better than throwing INTs and choking in big games. You just proved my point. THere was nothing "prolific" about Elway looking like a horesetoothed bozo in bright orange, laying horrendous eggs in SB. Currently, we have our own QB that is prolific int he regular season too and now looks like early years Elway when it counts. Not what I want.  I don't know any Pats fan that would. I am a Pats fan before I'm a Brady fan.
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    That's the thing.  Elway overachieved in his earlier years because he had to compensate for the absence of a bona fide RB.  Once T. Davis arrived, so did the ultimate success.
     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Philskiw1. Show Philskiw1's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    The fumbles he had late in the season happened because he got absolutely lit up, he doesn't have to learn to hold on as much as he needs to learn when to go down and avoid the hit.

    Truth ^

    My opinion is to get benched for fumbling he must have done it in practice as well. What did he put 2 on the ground? The first one he was stood up and had 8 guys on him. They should have blown the whistle for no progress. Ridley will prove to be an upgrade.
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]Actually, he was better than throwing INTs and choking in big games. You just proved my point. THere was nothing "prolific" about Elway looking like a horesetoothed bozo in bright orange, laying horrendous eggs in SB. Currently, we have our own QB that is prolific int he regular season too and now looks like early years Elway when it counts. Not what I want.  I don't know any Pats fan that would. I am a Pats fan before I'm a Brady fan.
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]


    You are such a stooge. Elway had 3 TDs and 8 INTs in 5 SBs. Brady has 9 TDs and 2 INTs in his 5. STOOGE!

    In his last two SBs that you call "laying horrendous eggs", he has 3 TDs and 1 INT. Get a f'n clue you MORON, LOL

    Fargin' Underdog is more of a Brady fan than you are.

    You can't be a Pats' fan if you're not a Brady fan.
     
     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BassFishing. Show BassFishing's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : You are such a stooge. Elway had 3 TDs and 8 INTs in 5 SBs. Brady has 9 TDs and 2 INTs in his 5. STOOGE! In his last two SBs that you call "laying horrendous eggs", he has 3 TDs and 1 INT. Get a f'n clue you MORON, LOL Fargin' Underdog is more of a Brady fan than you are. You can't be a Pats' fan if you're not a Brady fan.  
    Posted by BabeParilli[/QUOTE]

    Elway was also behind big time in those SBs (except for his 1st one), so forcing balls and INTs and throwing a lot was to be expected in those situations, since the Skins and 49ers knew he'd be throwing.

    You're so dumb you're making our case for us! lol!

    NE had a lead in each of the last 2 SBs and Brady threw 40 times in each game. 
     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]The fumbles he had late in the season happened because he got absolutely lit up, he doesn't have to learn to hold on as much as he needs to learn when to go down and avoid the hit. Truth ^ My opinion is to get benched for fumbling he must have done it in practice as well. What did he put 2 on the ground? The first one he was stood up and had 8 guys on him. They should have blown the whistle for no progress. Ridley will prove to be an upgrade.
    Posted by Philskiw1[/QUOTE]


    Stats show he fumbled once and didn't lose it. BB had him on a short leash for some reason. You're probably right. The practice field has something to do with it.
     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from BassFishing. Show BassFishing's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : That's the thing.  Elway overachieved in his earlier years because he had to compensate for the absence of a bona fide RB.  Once T. Davis arrived, so did the ultimate success.
    Posted by nyjoseph[/QUOTE]

    Ok...And?  Do you want to see us win a SB again here or not?   We need to run the freaking ball with a featured lead back most of the time, unless it's not necessary, which it will be in the postseason and SBs.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from BassFishing. Show BassFishing's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]The fumbles he had late in the season happened because he got absolutely lit up, he doesn't have to learn to hold on as much as he needs to learn when to go down and avoid the hit. Truth ^ My opinion is to get benched for fumbling he must have done it in practice as well. What did he put 2 on the ground? The first one he was stood up and had 8 guys on him. They should have blown the whistle for no progress. Ridley will prove to be an upgrade.
    Posted by Philskiw1[/QUOTE]


    Agreed. Said the same thing, They're not fundamental fumble issues. IN each case he had 2 guys on him and it was when he was struggling for extra yards. He just needs to learn from Faulk and ball up, feeling that pressure as it's arriving.

    Totally fixable, IMO.   He was trying too hard.  Guys like Brown, Branch, etc, mastered the art of balling up at the end when they felt the tackle coming.  Same sort of concept for Ridley.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : Elway was also behind big time in those SBs (except for his 1st one), so forcing balls and INTs and throwing a lot was to be expected in those situations, since the Skins and 49ers knew he'd be throwing. You're so dumb you're making our case for us! lol! NE had a lead in each of the last 2 SBs and Brady threw 40 times in each game. 
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    You were wrong and now you spin. Same old same old same old. You can never win because facts never back you up. It's always got to be the "situation" with you since facts never support your clueless notions. Or as you like to call your idiotic spin, "context". Pathetic. Feeble. Weak. Wrong.
     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from nyjoseph. Show nyjoseph's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : Ok...And?  Do you want to see us win a SB again here or not?   We need to run the freaking ball with a featured lead back most of the time, unless it's not necessary, which it will be in the postseason and SBs.
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    Yes, I do.  But I agree with BB.  BJGE is not that "featured back".  Once he finds the back he needs he'll get all the carries he can handle.  Most importantly, he must have someone that can pick up first downs on "running downs".
     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : Ok...And?  Do you want to see us win a SB again here or not?   We need to run the freaking ball with a featured lead back most of the time, unless it's not necessary, which it will be in the postseason and SBs.
    Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]

    No dumb dumb. We need to have a D get the stop at the end. WE WOULD HAVE 3 MORE SB WINS IF THEY HAD. You are dense.
     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : This is what they call spin Lazzie. It is the mortal enemy of fact. So, kid yourself if it feels good. But BB isn't kidding himself, or this awesome guy you lament would still be here. No?
    Posted by BabeParilli[/QUOTE]

    ^ This is what they call: The hollow, token volley that people with soldified impartialities on any given subject, now use more than seemingly ever before in the suppossedly "modern & informative age", to simply deflect what was originally provided as pure fat from purely detailed events which DID occur in front of everyone's own eyes.  It's the now widespread death-nell of reason, by using the figurative adult interpretation of a f#rting child in a group of 2 people total, being accused of originating that sound and the subsequent nasty smell, Inevitably being applauded for using the response of:  "Not ME, It was YOU! Because Those who 'SMELT-It, Dealt-It'!!!" <Next: insert sycophant applause & commendations, approval & agreements, From friends sharing that same sophomoric 3rd grade rationale and reasoning prowess />

    This IS, hands down, a PERFECT Example to offer in order to show what is terribly, terribly, terribly, WRONG with this world:  It is self-interest and those increasingly hardened thesises which come with it, absolutely crushing any and EVERY notion of critical & analytical mind right at the gate.  Its tragic...  The facts that don't fit in, become the "Nah-Uhhh, those aren't facts pal" response (without ever actually providing ANY or even 1 fact based counter.  And otherwise, when there IS an actual opening that you deem might provide a base for one of your OWN very singular accounting of what's broadly deemed, A(ahh)- Fact=Said fact Is ALWAYS a face-card, no depth...Any more digging on one of THESE, and then that depth too, Is dubbed: An attempt to spin.  

    The first is perfectly exemplified by your response up above...  The second type, is perfectly exemplified by those back-slapping closed-minded h#lf-w#ts who never fail to share The Fox News "fact" that the Top 10% of Americans in Salary, pay 65%(!) of ALL taxes collected...without them ever daring to recognize that even by the most conservative accounts, this top 10% have anywhere from 80%-95% of the total sum of wealth and assets.  It IS exemplified by those regurgitating the BJGE 3.7 yards per carry average as an example of him being a weak Runningback for NE, without ever taking into account: What his abilities MEAN within the set-up of The NE Team itself, and/or What and How he performed just the previous season, And/Or IF there was any conditional differences within the situations that he was mainly used and only offered to be used in, THIS year, And/Or within the very simple light of other examples of instances of OTHER persons offered the very same opportunity, OR MORE...and actually DOING less & Performing worse.

    It's half-blind, half-reasoned, and fanatically defensed regardless of whatever's offered in response at ANY and EVERY stage...until one's dying breath.  It's the exusatory insanity of a peon.  Again, It really IS tragic.           
     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Schumpeters-Ghost. Show Schumpeters-Ghost's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    They are going to need to pick up a RB.  It is a must.

    ridley looks okay.  Vereen - forget it.
     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : ^ This is what they call: The hollow, token volley that people with soldified impartialities on any given subject, now use more than seemingly ever before in the suppossedly "modern & informative age", to simply deflect what was originally provided as pure fat from purely detailed events which DID occur in front of everyone's own eyes.  It's the now widespread death-nell of reason, by using the figurative adult interpretation of a f#rting child in a group of 2 people total, being accused of originating that sound and the subsequent nasty smell, Inevitably being applauded for using the response of:  "Not ME, It was YOU! Because Those who 'SMELT-It, Dealt-It'!!!" <Next: insert sycophant applause & commendations, approval & agreements, From friends sharing that same sophomoric 3rd grade rationale and reasoning prowess /> This IS, hands down, a PERFECT Example to offer in order to show what is terribly, terribly, terribly, WRONG with this world:  It is self-interest and those increasingly hardened thesises which come with it, absolutely crushing any and EVERY notion of critical & analytical mind right at the gate.  Its tragic...  The facts that don't fit in, become the "Nah-Uhhh, those aren't facts pal" response (without ever actually providing ANY or even 1 fact based counter.  And otherwise, when there IS an actual opening that you deem might provide a base for one of your OWN very singular accounting of what's broadly deemed, A(ahh)- Fact=Said fact Is ALWAYS a face-card, no depth...Any more digging on one of THESE, and then that depth too, Is dubbed: An attempt to spin.   The first is perfectly exemplified by your response up above...  The second type, is perfectly exemplified by those back-slapping closed-minded h#lf-w#ts who never fail to share The Fox News "fact" that the Top 10% of Americans in Salary, pay 65%(!) of ALL taxes collected...without them ever daring to recognize that even by the most conservative accounts, this top 10% have anywhere from 80%-95% of the total sum of wealth and assets.  It IS exemplified by those regurgitating the BJGE 3.7 yards per carry average as an example of him being a weak Runningback for NE, without ever taking into account: What his abilities MEAN within the set-up of The NE Team itself, and/or What and How he performed just the previous season, And/Or IF there was any conditional differences within the situations that he was mainly used and only offered to be used in, THIS year, And/Or within the very simple light of other examples of instances of OTHER persons offered the very same opportunity, OR MORE...and actually DOING less & Performing worse. It's half-blind, half-reasoned, and fanatically defensed regardless of whatever's offered in response at ANY and EVERY stage...until one's dying breath.  It's the exusatory insanity of a peon.  Again, It really IS tragic.           
    Posted by LazarusintheSanatorium[/QUOTE]

    What is tragic is that you can use so many words to say nothing at all. Really, it's pathetic.

    You and the rest of the delusional clucks here have been body slammed by BB repeatedly because you know squat about the game. No need to shoot the messenger. Instead, live with it.
     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from LazarusintheSanatorium. Show LazarusintheSanatorium's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : What is tragic is that you can use so many words to say nothing at all. Really, it's pathetic. You and the rest of the delusional clucks here have been body slammed by BB repeatedly because you know squat about the game. No need to shoot the messenger. Instead, live with it.
    Posted by BabeParilli[/QUOTE]

    Babe, how 'bout "to wit."  Or is "to wit" 1 word too long?
     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from prolate0spheroid. Show prolate0spheroid's posts

    Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles

    In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: BJE Signs with the Bengles : queenie tends to forget johnny cochrane won his case  :  )
    Posted by JintsFan[/QUOTE]

    Yeah, but only in the real world . .  . 
     

Share