[QUOTE]No, what it does is it proves there was truth behind it. That's what it does. I said I did not blame him for leaving. They under-appreciated his value whether being benched at halftime v.s. Balt on 8 carries and 50 yards or in the SB where he ended up with 9 carries total with a 17-15 lead, before the last subbed in and pointless obligatory hand off at the end. That said, if the plan is to get a really talented guy in here to FORCE Brady to use more lead RB plays, then great! I am all for it. But, it doesn't change what happened in the postseason with BJGE and the fact we seriously did not lose games when he was used as a lead back. We need to stop subbing for the RBs on drives, minus a breather or an injury. The only time we'd ever pull off Antowain Smith or Dillon was due to them needing a breather. Or, if they saw something that Faulk could expose as a lead back.
Posted by BassFishing[/QUOTE]