Re: BJGE Hints As To One Reason He Left
posted at 3/23/2012 3:57 PM EDT
In Response to Re: BJGE Hints As To One Reason He Left
[QUOTE]I do get it Rusty. I am simply pointing out that a lot of your arguments are not compatible with what you just said. Sometimes you complain about the amount NE runs, other times the amount of time spent in the the shotgun and other times the subbing of the running backs. In many cases to support your case you use evidence that relies on one of these premises, but is in violation of the others. For example you use the AFC title game as evidence that BJGE should have been run more, but you ignore the fact that most of his successful runs were out of the shotgun. That was the point I was making. Your arguments aren't that complicated. Don't flatter yourself.
Posted by pcmIV[/QUOTE]
I don't need to have a complicated arugment after watching my team blow SBs due to failed offensive approach. Don't flatter yourself. Learn to read slower and better. IF this is problem isn't fixed, we will never win another SB.
As stated before, less shotgun is ideal because it opens up Brady, the best playaction QB in the NFL, but the bigger key is the subbing of the backs.
How many times do I need to capitalize "do not sub the backs on drives" for you to get that is the main overall point? You claim it's not complicated, but then you prove you don't get it.
Sure, I think I;d rather see more Brady under center to sell playaction more, but that's also another aspect not tied to the subbing concept necessarily.
What you're saying is, Woodhead is a better lead back and it doesn't matter if they sub or not. I disagree. Big time.
Why do you think I was excited about Ridley? I mean, it's just hilarious. I liked Ridley as a draft pick, was mocked, liked him in preseason and was mocked again. lol
I saw his skilll set as a possble lead back, a guy who can run hard, get outside, catch, block, etc, and it's because I don't want him subbed for. Translation? You don't need to sub for a guy like that.
Deception on drives. That's what we need.