Boldin instead of Edelman

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    Boldin is the football version of Mark Recchi, or before him Claude Lemieux. Older guys who coast through the regular season and play like all-stars in the playoffs. 

    I'm not sure that would fly with BB.

    (I wish Gronk was more like that.)

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. This post has been removed.

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bungalow-Bill. Show Bungalow-Bill's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    In response to 49Patriots's comment:

    Nah, our WR corps is good enough.




    Seriously? Do you still think Josh Boyce is Victor Cruz too?

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Footballexpert45. Show Footballexpert45's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    The WR's corp is not fine, it's a disaster.  Boldin would be a great pickup, but I can't set my expectations too high based on past offseason moves.

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Footballexpert45. Show Footballexpert45's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    In response to Bungalow-Bill's comment:

    In response to 49Patriots's comment:

    Nah, our WR corps is good enough.




    Seriously? Do you still think Josh Boyce is Victor Cruz too?



    I believe he does.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from NYPatsFan12. Show NYPatsFan12's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    who uses the word "bludgeoned" ?

     

    losers like tfb12 i bet

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    Given the choice of the the two, on a one year deal, for the same money, I'd take Boldin.

    Not a slight to Edelman, good player, but his skill set is fairly abundant in the NFL... Boldin type players (#1 type WR's with the ability to create all over the field) are more valuable, and harder to find.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BILLB50. Show BILLB50's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:


    I'd rather have Edelman. But if we can work Boldin in too, be ok with me



    Check what Bruschi says about Boldin for his all Bruschi team.Has him as his team captain and calls him clutch.He was voted MVP by 49ers team.This is someone Pats could use instead of Eldeman.Read article by Bill Williamson on ESPN San Francisco blog.

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from BILLB50. Show BILLB50's posts

    Re: Boldin instead of Edelman

    In response to mbeaulieu07's comment:

    Given the choice of the the two, on a one year deal, for the same money, I'd take Boldin.

    Not a slight to Edelman, good player, but his skill set is fairly abundant in the NFL... Boldin type players (#1 type WR's with the ability to create all over the field) are more valuable, and harder to find.



    Would be great to have Boldin,but 49ers will probably sign him back.He was difference with Ravens,that is why Flacco struggled.I can dream but not going to happen.

     
Sections
Shortcuts