Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

BRADY...is it time?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsLifer. Show PatsLifer's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to RockScully's comment:

    In response to PatsLifer's comment:

     

    It's the youngest d in the league in part to the fact we are constantly replacing players who fail with ones who fail . If bb the GM had hit on 2-3 more of the 20 picks he made on the defense in the last 4 years, things might be different Today. When you think of all the wasted picks it makes me sick in terms of where we could have been, we had many a chance to load up over the past 5 Years on defense and spent more 1st and 2nd round picks than any other team with not much to show. Couple that with a stable of FA disasters and this d is far from being elite. 

    Now, if it was elite like San Fran, coupled with our current skill players on offense, I might be more inclined to engage in the tb trade talk. It's not, do let's not fool ourselves. We win because we put up more points than almost any other team...not because we hold opponents to fewer points than almost any other team...

    on a related note...what's the chance Lombardi wants Brady not mallet?

     




    That's flat out false. NE started 4 rookies in 2010.  MCourty, Deaderick, Spikes, Hightower and now Jones with Dennard are starters. That's 5 starters alone under the age of 25. STARTERS. 

     

    You're wrong. That's you're young nucleus now with Mayo.

    Get over it and accept it. They're wearing rings from lasy year if not for a god awful Brady decision on 1st down in the 4th qtr in Giants territory or a Welker drop.

    This obsession with pretending Brady and this offense is somehow producing in January or February or held back by the 2007 D or the 2011/2012 D is pathetic.

    The change has been made. Brady MUST change too.   You're delusional. They're literally one special player away from being elite.

    Resign Talib, draft well, watch Jones and Hightower grow, etc.  Wake up. 

    You Brady Lovers have been absolutely delusional for so long.  All the investment has been for him in recent years. 

     

     



    I never said Brady was not at fault Russ. Step away from the edge. 

    Your the one who is delusional if you think we are 1 special player away from an elite D. More like 3....and to say Brady and the offense received all the investment is complete nonsense. look at the 2006 draft to the 2012 draft and tell me if the o or d received more of the quality picks in rounds 1-3....mayo, jones, Hightower, Chung , spikes, mccourty, butler, brace, Cunningham, Wilson, Wheatley , crable, mckenzie, etc...and that's not including late round picks and FA's. do your math boy wonder.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsLifer. Show PatsLifer's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    I forgot dowling as well

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from newenglanderinexile. Show newenglanderinexile's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

    In response to newenglanderinexile's comment:

     

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

     

    Well is it time to replace Brady? Is he turnig into the new Bledsoe? Just unsure if he has the fire inside still to win another SB nor the arm to throw the ball longer than 20yds with accuracy. Or do most think if the Pats had just a few more pieces, they would pull it off. 2 cracks at the Giants left them empty. And now falling a game short against the Ravens. How much longer can the Pats run with Brady at the helm?

     




    Since it will be so easy to find a replacement for him, it is definitely time to let him go.  I am sure they can easily identify someone in the draft, or get someone through free agency, or maybe by trade.  Nothing easier than finding a quarterback who can throw thirty plus touchdown passes a year with few interceptions.  There must be fifty guys out there who can do that.  So far Brady is the only quarterback in the history of the NFL who has led offenses that have scored 500 plus points four different years, but there must be dozens of others who can do that.  He may be the only quarterback in the history of the NFL with 100 more wins than losses, but, again, quarterbacks who can do that probably grow on trees.  Of course it's time to get rid of Brady.  The Patriots will have their pick of quarterbacks who can play better than he.  There's nothing easier than finding a Hall of Fame quarterback.  Look at all the teams in the NFL that do it all the time. 

     

     




    So sarcastic. So I guess you think Brady will always remain the Pats QB forever. Ok. Keep the blind faith moving. Fine. I am not discrediting his past abilities or achievements.

    But here is what I see as do others. He is not a deep passer. His is not nearly as accurate as you think. He lost his edge or fire to win when it matters most. He has an easy reg season division which actually plays against him come playoffs. He can't run or scamper for yds unless it is on the goal line. All good things do come to and end. He is getting up there in age.  

    And whether you want or wish to believe, he will need to be replaced just like all the other greats before him.




    Okay, so who do you have lined up to replace him?  He was the second or third best quarterback in the NFL during the 2012 regular season.  With him as quarterback, the Patriots scored 557 points, the third highest total in the history of the NFL.  So let's have some names of quarterbacks available in the draft or through a trade or free agency who would definitely be better than Brady next year.  Just name one quarterback the Patriots would have a chance of getting who you can guarantee would have a better year in 2013 than Brady had in 2012. 

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsLifer. Show PatsLifer's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    Well, Russ seems to think Alex Smith is our man. He would trade Brady and replace him with smith in a heartbeat 

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. This post has been removed.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from antiqueman1. Show antiqueman1's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to newenglanderinexile's comment:

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

     

    In response to newenglanderinexile's comment:

     

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

     

    Well is it time to replace Brady? Is he turnig into the new Bledsoe? Just unsure if he has the fire inside still to win another SB nor the arm to throw the ball longer than 20yds with accuracy. Or do most think if the Pats had just a few more pieces, they would pull it off. 2 cracks at the Giants left them empty. And now falling a game short against the Ravens. How much longer can the Pats run with Brady at the helm?

     




    Since it will be so easy to find a replacement for him, it is definitely time to let him go.  I am sure they can easily identify someone in the draft, or get someone through free agency, or maybe by trade.  Nothing easier than finding a quarterback who can throw thirty plus touchdown passes a year with few interceptions.  There must be fifty guys out there who can do that.  So far Brady is the only quarterback in the history of the NFL who has led offenses that have scored 500 plus points four different years, but there must be dozens of others who can do that.  He may be the only quarterback in the history of the NFL with 100 more wins than losses, but, again, quarterbacks who can do that probably grow on trees.  Of course it's time to get rid of Brady.  The Patriots will have their pick of quarterbacks who can play better than he.  There's nothing easier than finding a Hall of Fame quarterback.  Look at all the teams in the NFL that do it all the time. 

     

     




    So sarcastic. So I guess you think Brady will always remain the Pats QB forever. Ok. Keep the blind faith moving. Fine. I am not discrediting his past abilities or achievements.

    But here is what I see as do others. He is not a deep passer. His is not nearly as accurate as you think. He lost his edge or fire to win when it matters most. He has an easy reg season division which actually plays against him come playoffs. He can't run or scamper for yds unless it is on the goal line. All good things do come to and end. He is getting up there in age.  

    And whether you want or wish to believe, he will need to be replaced just like all the other greats before him.

     




    Okay, so who do you have lined up to replace him?  He was the second or third best quarterback in the NFL during the 2012 regular season.  With him as quarterback, the Patriots scored 557 points, the third highest total in the history of the NFL.  So let's have some names of quarterbacks available in the draft or through a trade or free agency who would definitely be better than Brady next year.  Just name one quarterback the Patriots would have a chance of getting who you can guarantee would have a better year in 2013 than Brady had in 2012. 

     




    That is the whole point of this discussion really. Who is lined up to take his place. Since it will have to happen sooner rather than later. And if I remember correctly no one knew Brady was going to be this good either. Great reg. season stats. But it does not seem to equate well in the post season that well anymore. But many of you just think Brady or bust. I have no idea who will replace Brady just like I did not know how well Brady was going to do at replacing Bledsoe.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from antiqueman1. Show antiqueman1's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to ipotnyc's comment:

    They absolutely can win another ring with TB at the helm.  TB is not the problem for the next 2 years.  It is how they game plan him.  People easily forget he built his legend by winning 3 SBs in his first 4 seasons.  

    Remember "that" TB?  The one who was simply a great game manager?  The one who we KNEW would get it done, when everyone was drooling over the Gomer Mannings of the world?

    The reinvention of TB as a stat machine has taken a bit away from what was winning this team rings.  At least this past season we found a running game.

    I'd rather he throw for 3,500 yds a season and win the games that matter.  No one in the QB biz is better at managing a game.  He needs to get back to that and that's up to the HC, not TB.



    I am not so sure that TB(age) exists anymore. But you make great points about the stat machine. Reminds me of Rondo(stat wise only). But I agree, he and the Pats need to get that back in order to win.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from antiqueman1. Show antiqueman1's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

     

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    Stupid question. Of course it's time to replace the GOAT.

    Why I'll bet nobody else will even make him an offer since a crackerjack football expert like you has deemed him washed up. Let's move right on to our next HOF QB. Shouldn't take more than a week or so to find one.

     

    Oh, btw, - Learn the game.

     



    Thank God you are not running the show either, just your mouth once again. Let's see, the 49ers look pretty successful after replacing their starting QB with a backup midseason. Oh, I guess it can't happen. And I never said trade, just asked if it was time to think about replacing him. A bit sensitive about it I see as usual babepar.  

     

     




    LMAO@U Righto genius. The 9ers are loaded. Smith and Kaepernick both put up great numbers. I guess according to your thought process they're both HOFers, right?

     

    Of course you would like to line up somebody to replace an aging star. But when your D was 25th in yards given up and your run game was below the league average per carry you probably have other concerns than finding your next HOF QB, ya think?

     

    Learn the game.




    Was Brady a HOF qb when he took over for Bledsoe? No, I don't think so. He earned it. All I did was ask about replacing him and when does that happen. Which seems like a sore subject for many of you.

    Let's see babe. Seems to me the year he was out and Matt Cassel took over the Pats they went 11-5. That is pretty d_m good don't you think for not having Brady and for putting in a QB who had never started in a single college game.

    You make it seem like the Pats can't win without Brady. Which in a way gets to part of the point. Don't you think it is time, if Mallett is the back up, he should at least start getting some meaningful snaps?

    Get off your high horse podium babe and learn to take part in a discussion. Who knows you might actually learn something.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from antiqueman1. Show antiqueman1's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to antiqueman1's comment:

     

     

    Get off your high horse podium babe and learn to take part in a discussion. Who knows you might actually learn something.

     

     


    From you? You would have to have a clue and make some sense for that to happen.

    It's not from the perch of a high horse that one can conclude that having a HOF QB probably helps your team much more than not having one. It comes from simply having the slightest clue how this league works. That apparently leaves you out from all you have said so far.



    Oh I forgot, you are mr. know it all. Or perhaps you stayed at a Holiday Inn. Which is more likely. You rant and rant some more, but never actually add anything to the disucssion. You like to attack and are in love with your "learn the game" phrase. I guess it makes you feel more important or something. Anyway, thanks for adding nothing to the topic except your typical slanderous remarks. Enjoy

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to PatsLifer's comment:

    It's the youngest d in the league in part to the fact we are constantly replacing players who fail with ones who fail . If bb the GM had hit on 2-3 more of the 20 picks he made on the defense in the last 4 years, things might be different Today. When you think of all the wasted picks it makes me sick in terms of where we could have been, we had many a chance to load up over the past 5 Years on defense and spent more 1st and 2nd round picks than any other team with not much to show. Couple that with a stable of FA disasters and this d is far from being elite. 

    Now, if it was elite like San Fran, coupled with our current skill players on offense, I might be more inclined to engage in the tb trade talk. It's not, do let's not fool ourselves. We win because we put up more points than almost any other team...not because we hold opponents to fewer points than almost any other team...

    on a related note...what's the chance Lombardi wants Brady not mallet?



    True and think about this...when we have to get rid of Gregory next, we will most likely have to replace that mistake with a younger, cheaper alternative. Hence why we keep staying so young. When cheap veterans like Haynesworth, Springs, Bodden, Ellis, Gregory, Fenene, and many more go total bust on us...we are going to be young on defense. Then the apologists will come out and make excuses for us being so young - reality is we have gone cheap acquiring players and these mistakes are replaced with younger, even cheaper "Talent". The thing that stinks is that all we need is to hit on a couple of these free agent guys on defense and the whole thing can be turned around. They should of signed Gohlston when he was sitting in our complex two years ago, but he wanted a bit more money. They should of signed Red Bryant when he was sitting across from Belichick in his office, but he wanted more money too. Instead we ended up with Gregory, Fenene and 7 million of money that wasn't spent on the cap - if both of those guys are on our roster....we win the  Super Bowl. Instead we are left a year later trying to find ways yet again to improve those spots...more resources will be used/wasted. It was a mistake...those things happen, but when Brady is gone they will be magnified by a thousand.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from antiqueman1. Show antiqueman1's posts

    Re: BRADY...is it time?

    In response to jri37's comment:

    To answer your question based on his level of play this year it is not the time. Is it a fair question to ask???? After next year you can evaluate his play and production and ask the question again but in my opinion as of right now and it is only an opinion he is still an elite player in this league.




    Fair enough. I never said he needed to be traded or replaced today. Just asking in general how many more yrs in the tank does he have left? Of course he is not the same Brady nor are these the same Pats that won the SB. But his fire seems lacking. Ho hum.

     
Sections
Shortcuts