Bruschi... now Seymour?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from RWPilk. Show RWPilk's posts

    Bruschi... now Seymour?

    Brushchi gone and now Seymour. What do you guys think? I heard that Belichick might be converting the defense to a 4-3?

    Check out more here:

    http://sweetflaccoaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/another-pats-retirement.html

    Any thoughts?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from rameakap. Show rameakap's posts

    Re: Bruschi... now Seymour?

    your blog sure is full of lame one-liners and evidence that you lack any knowledge about the sport of football. Well done.
     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnochRoot. Show EnochRoot's posts

    Re: Bruschi... now Seymour?

    In Response to Bruschi... now Seymour?:
    [QUOTE]Brushchi gone and now Seymour. What do you guys think? I heard that Belichick might be converting the defense to a 4-3? Check out more here: http://sweetflaccoaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/another-pats-retirement.html Any thoughts?
    Posted by RWPilk[/QUOTE]

    This just proves what my grandfather always said - "You're an idiot." 

    You don't even know the difference between a 3-4 and a 4-3. You state that Belichick has traded players to Oakland. And it seems that you have a new way of referring to your own impotence - "Sweet Flacco Action"? Yes, I know you are referring to Joe, but I thought that having a boycrush on a football player was worse than being impotent so I gave you a new interpretation.
     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share