Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Bruschi... now Seymour?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from RWPilk. Show RWPilk's posts

    Bruschi... now Seymour?

    Brushchi gone and now Seymour. What do you guys think? I heard that Belichick might be converting the defense to a 4-3?

    Check out more here:

    http://sweetflaccoaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/another-pats-retirement.html

    Any thoughts?
     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from EnochRoot. Show EnochRoot's posts

    Re: Bruschi... now Seymour?

    In Response to Bruschi... now Seymour?:
    Brushchi gone and now Seymour. What do you guys think? I heard that Belichick might be converting the defense to a 4-3? Check out more here: http://sweetflaccoaction.blogspot.com/2009/09/another-pats-retirement.html Any thoughts?
    Posted by RWPilk


    This just proves what my grandfather always said - "You're an idiot." 

    You don't even know the difference between a 3-4 and a 4-3. You state that Belichick has traded players to Oakland. And it seems that you have a new way of referring to your own impotence - "Sweet Flacco Action"? Yes, I know you are referring to Joe, but I thought that having a boycrush on a football player was worse than being impotent so I gave you a new interpretation.
     
Sections
Shortcuts