We won by 3 points...at home. Almost every Thurs game has been sloppy this season, which should benefit the Jets more than the Pats.

2010, after beating the Jets 45-3, we lost 28-21.

 

After all this, and what happened between JAX and HOU, we should all be aware that division games are anything but guaranteed. Remember that STL-SF tie?

I still expect the Pats to win. But the Jets do have home field and will be probably playing for their playoff lives.

 

Wouldn't surprise me if we blew them out, but it also wouldn't surprise me if the Jets found a way to squeak by. With a bye week within reach, Pats can't afford a slip up

In response to dapats1281's comment:

I hear that BB never loses when he has two weeks to prepare.

I think it will be a huge win for the Patriots on Thanksgiving day.  Somebody told me the Patriots are very hungry for Turkey, they will see plenty of turkeys on the field Thursday!!

Tru dis....  Should be a fascinating game.  Think of all the hype possibilities.

It will be a big disappointment if the Pats lose to the Jets:

(1) Jets suck

(2) Pats are pretty good

(3) I hate the Jets

The Jets ALWAYS bring their A game against the Pats. This Thursday will be no different. Pats prevail but it will be a nail biter.

This post has been removed.

In response to portfolio1's comment:

I'm going to guess that it is really number three that drives you.

Considering it took help from the refs and a dropped pass by the Jets (playing without their best two players) to win a couple of weeks ago, you would think that this post would not be necessary.  Then again, perhaps I underestimate the arrogance of Patriot fans coming of a thrashing of the team without it's HC and starting a rookies QB coming off a 3 win season. 

In response to MasterHess-'s comment:

I can see that you are an expert with reference to arrogance. 

Yes and your history with Seattle this year was what?  Seems to me that they're a pretty good team.  Seems to me having watched some YET games again this year that your team isn't.

 

Win the division, then you can talk, and please note that any comments about AFC championship games of yore will cause me to break wind in your general direction, which would be to the south west from here.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

I hear the Jets have yet to win a Superbowl in 43 years. That can't be right can it?

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

We have a reason to be arrogant. Our team is 7-3! Our team is above .500! What's your excuse?

I'll take them lightly.  The Jets are softer then Leon's abs. 42 - 6 Patriots.

The Jets will be playing for all the marbles next Thursday night and you can take that to the bank. With that I'm not saying that they will necessarily win but we can be sure it will not be a cake walk in the Meadowlands...

Sure, even the Jets can pull one out now and then but it's not likely. 

The Pats will have to lay a big egg to lose to that team. 

Then again, if for some incredible reason the Jets were able to win you know their season will be over right there.  That would be their Superbowl.  They'd already be thinking of golfing in the off season.

They're not that good or disciplined enough to play that well from then on to the rest to the season.

In response to Rodimus77's comment:

No , it is not right.  They haven't even smelled a Super Bowl in 43 years.

In response to Rodimus77's comment:

7--3 with 5 fourth quarter collapses is reason to be arrogant? Wow!  What a tool.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

Yet they are still 7-3! What's your teams current record? We can argue this point back and forth but the bottom line is...a W is a W and a L is an L! My team has more W's than yours! Your team has more L's! Who's the tool now?

This post has been removed.

I agree. Losng to them would suck, and now without Gronk, we have to double down and make sure we keep our foot on their throats. No letups.

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

Yeah those pesky dropped passes. good ol rock hands Hill cost you guys a W. I guess that what you get when you draft WR's who blocked in the triple option instead of catching passes in college.

 

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

It's not even worth responding specifically to guys like you. Mark Twain said it best - "Do not argue with an idiot; they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

In response to LessPhatRex's comment:

Oh, so I'm the dillweed? So I lack intelligence? Really? I'm not the idiot Jets fan on a Patriots forum talking nonsense about my 4-6 team! You clowns were no-shows for about 2 weeks now. Now all of a sudden...your team gets a victory and it's time for the triumphant return to BDC to talk smack about the below .500 Jets and question why us Pats fans are "arrogant". Really dude? What is their to talk smack about? Please solve that mystery for me. We are just dying to know. 

The Jets are such a bad team ..  I saw that game against Seattle a couple of weeks ago, eesh . They have nothing, bad everywhere but do have an average kicker.

In response to jri37's comment:

Yeah, I know.  He's no Taylor Price, Brandon Tate or Chad Jackson.  Thank God for that.  I think they caught lots of passes in college.  How'd that work out?