1. You have chosen to ignore posts from unclealfie. Show unclealfie's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/12/2010 10:39 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    Any player who has 100 catches for a 1000+ yards can sleep with whatever he wants. What Peyton failed to mention was that this was a life size bear with correct female anatomy.
    Posted by MarcW1


    any idea where he got it?
     

  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Wizardsjag. Show Wizardsjag's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/12/2010 10:55 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : 5 of the last 6.  THOSE ARE THE FACTS!!
    Posted by underdoggg


    Still behind us 32-14 all time though :) 
     

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from fourjays30. Show fourjays30's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 5:40 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : I finished in 1:47.  It was a windy and cold morning.  I have a new appreciation for the size of the Indianapolis speedway.  It was a long 2.5 miles.  As far as St. Elmo's, never thought I'd have shrimp in the midwest that was as good as any hear.  Since I was in Indy on a weekend, I thought it was pretty lively.  All cities including Vegas are pretty slow Monday thru Thursday. 
    Posted by MarcW1


    I don't believe we have shrimp around here,clams yes, shrimp no. So did they have any clams or maybe lobster that was as good!Cool
     

  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 8:44 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    Who cares specifically about Dallas Clark's individual performance.  Football is a team game and I don't root for Dallas over Reggie Wayne or Manning or Addai or anyone else.  Besides - if the pats schemed to take away Clark then they left something else open.  How do I know?  Over those 6 games (including one loss), the colts outscored the pats average by more than 12 points in each game (again, including the loss).    Further - if you want to mock Clark that is fine, but in the last 10 years the pats haven't had a tight end that could hold a candle to what Clark has done.  Teddy Bear and all.
    Posted by underdoggg


    Then why would you bring up something other than the topic at hand...Is this about Dallas clark sleeping with a Teddy bear?

    Are you that dumb and desperate to retaliate that you would throw out abstract stats that mean nothing to the topic at hand?  WOW!  That is PATHETIC!
     

  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 9:06 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    Who cares specifically about Dallas Clark's individual performance.  Football is a team game and I don't root for Dallas over Reggie Wayne or Manning or Addai or anyone else.  Besides - if the pats schemed to take away Clark then they left something else open.  How do I know?  Over those 6 games (including one loss), the colts outscored the pats average by more than 12 points in each game (again, including the loss).    Further - if you want to mock Clark that is fine, but in the last 10 years the pats haven't had a tight end that could hold a candle to what Clark has done.  Teddy Bear and all.
    Posted by underdoggg


    Ok, here I go correcting your fuzzy math again....

    If you want to use the scoring of both teams, and since this is a thread about Dallas Clark....then we will use the data from when he started in 2003.....

     Pats indy
    20093435
    20081518
    20072420
    20062027
    20063438
    20052140
    20042724
    2004203
    20033834
    20032414
    total257253
    avg25.725.3


    Now, this does not look like Indy outscoring NE.....it actually looks pretty close with NE having the slight edge.....
     

  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 9:26 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Then why would you bring up something other than the topic at hand...Is this about Dallas clark sleeping with a Teddy bear? Are you that dumb and desperate to retaliate that you would throw out abstract stats that mean nothing to the topic at hand?  WOW!  That is PATHETIC!
    Posted by m1021us


    The topic at hand?  Are you kidding me?  In a previous thread I mention Brady and Vinatieri rings and you throw in Belichick (off subject) and you are going to attempt to call me out?  Could you be anymore transparent, anymore hypocritical?  Nope.  You are a disgrace to your own fans.  You are a joke - and a bad one at that.
     

  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 9:43 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Ok, here I go correcting your fuzzy math again.... If you want to use the scoring of both teams, and since this is a thread about Dallas Clark....then we will use the data from when he started in 2003.....   Pats   indy 2009 34 35 2008 15 18 2007 24 20 2006 20 27 2006 34 38 2005 21 40 2004 27 24 2004 20 3 2003 38 34 2003 24 14 total 257 253 avg 25.7 25.3 Now, this does not look like Indy outscoring NE.....it actually looks pretty close with NE having the slight edge.....
    Posted by m1021us


    And to think you called me out for changing topics.  First, I set the parameters and now you are trying to change them because you know I am right.  Joke.   Second - you are adding a comparison that has never been a part of this discussion.  What is pathetic, is that I don't even think you know that you did this. 

    My comments about the colts outscoring the pats average points given up has nothing to do with Indy's defense, or the points that the pats scored against Indy.  This is about Indy's O vs. the Pats D, and I effectively proved that the colts treated pats D like a sieve by outscoring the pats average points given up by more than 2 TD's.  

    I know this is more complex than your second grade education, but please try to stay on task. 
     

  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from iceman778. Show iceman778's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 10:12 AM EDT

    sleeping with teddy is wonderful
     

  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 10:44 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : The topic at hand?  Are you kidding me?  In a previous thread I mention Brady and Vinatieri rings and you throw in Belichick (off subject) and you are going to attempt to call me out?  Could you be anymore transparent, anymore hypocritical?  Nope.  You are a disgrace to your own fans.  You are a joke - and a bad one at that.
    Posted by underdoggg


    Oh, you mean that topic about Vinatieri when you threw Brady into the conversation?  That one?  So it is ok for you to throw Brady into the topic and I can't throw Belichick in?  LOL!  Wow, how dumb are you?
     

  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 10:51 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : And to think you called me out for changing topics.  First, I set the parameters and now you are trying to change them because you know I am right.  Joke.   Second - you are adding a comparison that has never been a part of this discussion.  What is pathetic, is that I don't even think you know that you did this.  My comments about the colts outscoring the pats average points given up has nothing to do with Indy's defense, or the points that the pats scored against Indy.  This is about Indy's O vs. the Pats D, and I effectively proved that the colts treated pats D like a sieve by outscoring the pats average points given up by more than 2 TD's.   I know this is more complex than your second grade education, but please try to stay on task. 
    Posted by underdoggg


    I used the data back to when Dallas Clark started with the Pats because the topic is ABOUT DALLASS CLARK....That is where the parameters shuold be.....there is no reason that you licked the parameters that you did, it does not make sense to the topic at hand......stop being an idiot and use the correct data.

    I helped your comparison of the Indy O to the Pats D by showing you what the Pats O has done VS Indy D....and since 2003, Pats have been better.....

    Sorry, but you have been PWNED! 
     

  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:08 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Oh, you mean that topic about Vinatieri when you threw Brady into the conversation?  That one?  So it is ok for you to throw Brady into the topic and I can't throw Belichick in?  LOL!  Wow, how dumb are you?
    Posted by m1021us


    So you are saying that only you can change the topic?  Got it.  Listen - Your Belichick comments were irrelevant because the extra SB's had nothing to do with either the colts or pats which is the basis of our discussion.  It was pathetic. 

    I set the parameters of the discussion and you want to change them.  Sorry - stay with the program, right?  Regadless, prior to 05 Clark platooned with Pollard so he was not a focal point. 

    Further, you want want to call me out for including the colts in the clark conversation - here's why I do it.  If the pats focused on shutting down Clark, and were successful, what did it afford them? - a 1-5 record from 05 to current.  If you win the battle but lose the war, does the battle really matter? 
     

  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:11 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : I used the data back to when Dallas Clark started with the Pats because the topic is ABOUT DALLASS CLARK....That is where the parameters shuold be.....there is no reason that you licked the parameters that you did, it does not make sense to the topic at hand......stop being an idiot and use the correct data. I helped your comparison of the Indy O to the Pats D by showing you what the Pats O has done VS Indy D....and since 2003, Pats have been better..... Sorry, but you have been PWNED! 
    Posted by m1021us


    Are you saying my data was incorrect? 

    And what does indy's D vs. NE's O have to do with the discussion?  Clark does not play defense.  I know focus is difficult for you, but please try. 
     

  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:31 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : So you are saying that only you can change the topic?  Got it.  Listen - Your Belichick comments were irrelevant because the extra SB's had nothing to do with either the colts or pats which is the basis of our discussion.  It was pathetic.  I set the parameters of the discussion and you want to change them.  Sorry - stay with the program, right?  Regadless, prior to 05 Clark platooned with Pollard so he was not a focal point.  Further, you want want to call me out for including the colts in the clark conversation - here's why I do it.  If the pats focused on shutting down Clark, and were successful, what did it afford them? - a 1-5 record from 05 to current.  If you win the battle but lose the war, does the battle really matter? 
    Posted by underdoggg


    You are the one who keeps changing the topic.....not me.  LOL!  Nice try....
     

  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:34 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Are you saying my data was incorrect?  And what does indy's D vs. NE's O have to do with the discussion?  Clark does not play defense.  I know focus is difficult for you, but please try. 
    Posted by underdoggg


    Actually the amount of data (or lack there of)....you picked the data that you did because it fit your idiotic topic that was not related to the initial discussion.

    But Dallass Clark was with the team since 2003.....

    What does the the record have to do with Dallass Clark?  You keep bringing up the record, it is meaningless...like all of your discussions.....

    Just keep trolling.....
     

  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:40 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : You are the one who keeps changing the topic.....not me.  LOL!  Nice try....
    Posted by m1021us


    Babies with Teddy Bears treating the pats D like a sieve.  LOL!!!!
     

  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 11:48 AM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Actually the amount of data (or lack there of)....you picked the data that you did because it fit your idiotic topic that was not related to the initial discussion. But Dallass Clark was with the team since 2003..... What does the the record have to do with Dallass Clark?  You keep bringing up the record, it is meaningless...like all of your discussions..... Just keep trolling.....
    Posted by m1021us


    So he was with the team in 03.  in 03-04 he was a platooning player with Marcus Pollard who was the primary TE.  In 05 to current he is the starting TE and Pollard was gone.  Would I blame Brady for the pats 5-11 year in 2000?  He was on the team.  That would be ridiculous.  So lets use the year's that really matter. 

    As for the record, it has everything to do with everything.  It shows that Clark and his team regardless of what you think the pats have done to him specifically have manhandled your team.  This is not singles tennis.  This is a team sport.  If the Pats chose to account for Clark specifically they did so to their detriment.  The colts offense since clark was a starter outplayed the pats defense by 2 TD over their average.  Crushed the pats. 

    If I were a patriot or a pat fan, I wouldn't laugh about the Teddy Bear.  I'd figure out a way to destroy it. 
     

  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 12:21 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Babies with Teddy Bears treating the pats D like a sieve.  LOL!!!!
    Posted by underdoggg


    We know of 1 (Dalass Clark)baby that uses a Teddy bear and he has been in the league for 7 years and has exactly 0 TD's against the Pats in 9 tries......I think that you are wrong AGAIN!
     

  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 12:30 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : So he was with the team in 03.  in 03-04 he was a platooning player with Marcus Pollard who was the primary TE.  In 05 to current he is the starting TE and Pollard was gone.  Would I blame Brady for the pats 5-11 year in 2000?  He was on the team.  That would be ridiculous.  So lets use the year's that really matter.  As for the record, it has everything to do with everything.  It shows that Clark and his team regardless of what you think the pats have done to him specifically have manhandled your team.  This is not singles tennis.  This is a team sport.  If the Pats chose to account for Clark specifically they did so to their detriment.  The colts offense since clark was a starter outplayed the pats defense by 2 TD over their average.  Crushed the pats.  If I were a patriot or a pat fan, I wouldn't laugh about the Teddy Bear.  I'd figure out a way to destroy it. 
    Posted by underdoggg


    I don't care if Baby Clark has split time or was the sole TE in every game that he played against the Pats.....He played in 9 games vs the Pats and has 0 TD's....he has not been a factor in any of the scoring against the Pats.  FACT!

    Brady played in 1 game in 2000 and was a non factor in the decision (a blow out loss to the Lions)..... 

    What is funny is that blowout that you love to include in your stats to make your team look superior back in 2005.....Dalass Clark (1rec, 4yds) was outplayed by Bryan Fletcher (2 rec, 22yds)....LOL!  Baby Clark! 0 TD's!
     

  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 12:34 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : So he was with the team in 03.  in 03-04 he was a platooning player with Marcus Pollard who was the primary TE.  In 05 to current he is the starting TE and Pollard was gone.  Would I blame Brady for the pats 5-11 year in 2000?  He was on the team.  That would be ridiculous.  So lets use the year's that really matter.  As for the record, it has everything to do with everything.  It shows that Clark and his team regardless of what you think the pats have done to him specifically have manhandled your team.  This is not singles tennis.  This is a team sport.  If the Pats chose to account for Clark specifically they did so to their detriment.  The colts offense since clark was a starter outplayed the pats defense by 2 TD over their average.  Crushed the pats.  If I were a patriot or a pat fan, I wouldn't laugh about the Teddy Bear.  I'd figure out a way to destroy it. 
    Posted by underdoggg


    Ohhhh, I am scared.....since Clark was on the team in 2003 the Colts O has scored 25 ponts per game......WOW!  Who really cares?  Clark had 1 good game against the Pats EVER and even then he scored 0 TD's.....
     

  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 12:41 PM EDT

    Another thing...Pollard did not factor into the loss to the Pats in 2004 if he even played......

    And as bad as Clark (2rec, 26 yds) was in the 2004 playoffs loss to the Pats pollard was worse (1rec, 2 yds).....WOW!
     

  21. This post has been removed.

     

  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from m1021us. Show m1021us's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 1:04 PM EDT

    I do find it funny that Pay-a-ton Manning has no problem throwing his o-line under the bus....now he is making his TE look bad with this.....Pay-a-ton has no scruples.....
     

  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 2:01 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : I don't care if Baby Clark has split time or was the sole TE in every game that he played against the Pats.....He played in 9 games vs the Pats and has 0 TD's....he has not been a factor in any of the scoring against the Pats.  FACT! Brady played in 1 game in 2000 and was a non factor in the decision (a blow out loss to the Lions).....  What is funny is that blowout that you love to include in your stats to make your team look superior back in 2005.....Dalass Clark (1rec, 4yds) was outplayed by Bryan Fletcher (2 rec, 22yds)....LOL!  Baby Clark! 0 TD's!
    Posted by m1021us

    And ever since he has been the primary tight end for the colts (teddy bear and all) the colts have beaten the pats 83% of the time.  I'd find a way to get ahold of that Teddy Bear - it's kryptonite to the pats. 
     

  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 2:05 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear.... : Ohhhh, I am scared.....since Clark was on the team in 2003 the Colts O has scored 25 ponts per game......WOW!  Who really cares?  Clark had 1 good game against the Pats EVER and even then he scored 0 TD's.....
    Posted by m1021us


    YOu have nothing to be scared of - you are a fan, not a player.  But since Clark (bear and all) has been the primary TE for the colts, the colts have beaten the pats 83% of the time.  The colts have outscored the pats defensive scoring average by more than 2 TDs.  The pats may have made a concerted effort to take Clark away from Manning, but if so it only served to open something else up.  In the most team of games, a decoy that requires focus is just as effective the guy catching the balls. 

    Would you rather win the battle or win the war? 
     

  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from underdoggg. Show underdoggg's posts

    Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....

    posted at 5/13/2010 2:11 PM EDT

    In Response to Re: certain Colt sleeps with teddy bear....:
    I do find it funny that Pay-a-ton Manning has no problem throwing his o-line under the bus....now he is making his TE look bad with this.....Pay-a-ton has no scruples.....
    Posted by m1021us


    excuse me - didn't Brady just say his team lacked mental toughness.  This coming from the leader that is now no longer putting 100% of his focus on the team (not saying he is wrong), and not participating fully in the offseason program.  

    Talk about throwing the team under the bus and then not being around to help them get tougher.  Nothing could be worse.