Colts Vs. Ravens

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    #50 for the Colts $ucks every time I see them play! Horrible.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    If Flacco and Suggs had a baby, it would look like...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to UD6's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Refs already trying to structure a Luck vs Manning game in Denver.

    How on earth is that called for Indy? The guy never had full possession!  His own helmet made it rattle loose and Yanda pounced on it!

    If that is not proof that they will try to frame this in favor of the Colts for a Luck vs Manning game, I don't know what it is!

     

    [/QUOTE]

    You're such a joke.  You have no capacity to be objective. 2 uncalled facemasks.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're the joke. You're the only loser fan on the planet who pretends the guy who recovers the ball, really didn't.

    Meanwhile, Luck was LUCKY that plays with the supposed facemask wasn't an in the grasp sack call. That's TWICE where he was in the grasp and the play was dead, but they let him try to get through.

    PI calls are also subjective, so you're wrong. Fact is, Yanda had that ball on the Rice fumble.  Period.

    Not debatable. Absolute bagjob call the ref (that's the key part) took advantage of to help out the Colts there.

    [/QUOTE]

    Wrongo keeb.  i see it all ways. refs miss calls but your limits only allow you to mention the ones that support your Small brain.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    babe in the red tank in the BL commercial is hot

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to mbeaulieu07's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    If Flacco and Suggs had a baby, it would look like...

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [/QUOTE]


    oh man, that's terrible

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    your on a roll today mbeaulieu07!! Dont forget to tip your waitresses and bartender.......lol

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from tcal2-. Show tcal2-'s posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tcal2-'s comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to tcal2-'s comment:
    [QUOTE]

    These 2 teams stink.

    [/QUOTE]


    You best hope Brady doesn't have a slow start vs Houston, TCal/Mighty.

    [/QUOTE]

    Why Schaub scares you?  Hell no one scored in the 1st Qtr of this game.  What's your point?

    [/QUOTE]

    My points is, sometimes playoff games can see teams evenly matched, or teams feel each other out early in games and they can be low scoring. It doesn't mean "these two teams" suck".

    It's very clear that the main reason why you like football is to be entertained by a lot of points being scored.

    That means you're a casual fan, TCal/Mighty.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Thanks for your professional assessment.  Next time, if I'm interested in what you think, I'll ask for your opinion.  Now enjoy the game and keep the childish attacks to a minimum.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from mbeaulieu07. Show mbeaulieu07's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    your on a roll today mbeaulieu07!! Dont forget to tip your waitresses and bartender.......lol

    [/QUOTE]


    Haha, I wish I could blame aclohol... this sh1T just pops into my head.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I think what he meant was Brady's FIRST year starting, statistically. The fact is, Luck was pro-ready, by his senior year in college, which is very unusual.

    Luck's rookie year blows away Gomer's first year, too. Gomer threw 28 INTs his rookie year while handing off to Marshall Faulk.

    [/QUOTE]

    That's what I think the troll meant, but that's not what he said.

    He's right.

    Luck has infinitely exceeded Bradys INTs.

     

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    If not for Gost we would be playing Fetus Head at the Razor.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from shenanigan. Show shenanigan's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I think what he meant was Brady's FIRST year starting, statistically. The fact is, Luck was pro-ready, by his senior year in college, which is very unusual.

    Luck's rookie year blows away Gomer's first year, too. Gomer threw 28 INTs his rookie year while handing off to Marshall Faulk.

    [/QUOTE]

    That's what I think the troll meant, but that's not what he said.

    He's right.

    Luck has infinitely exceeded Bradys INTs.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Surely that's not what he meant.  Luck didnt win the SB did he?

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    old reliable AV

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    Vinatieri is still automatic!

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to shenanigan's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to RockScully's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I think what he meant was Brady's FIRST year starting, statistically. The fact is, Luck was pro-ready, by his senior year in college, which is very unusual.

    Luck's rookie year blows away Gomer's first year, too. Gomer threw 28 INTs his rookie year while handing off to Marshall Faulk.

    [/QUOTE]

    That's what I think the troll meant, but that's not what he said.

    He's right.

    Luck has infinitely exceeded Bradys INTs.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Surely that's not what he meant.  Luck didnt win the SB did he?

    [/QUOTE]


    Excellent point.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    AV is probably the only guy BB has let walk that he shouldn't have.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Vinatieri is still automatic!

    [/QUOTE]


    if we had him we would have been the no1 seed (cough cough Cards game )

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    can this indy team beat denver

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    AV is probably the only guy BB has let walk that he shouldn't have.

    [/QUOTE]

    def should nto have.

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to BsLegion's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Vinatieri is still automatic!

    [/QUOTE]


    if we had him we would have been the no1 seed (cough cough Cards game )

    [/QUOTE]

    exactly

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from BsLegion. Show BsLegion's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to BsLegion's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Quagmire3's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Vinatieri is still automatic!

    [/QUOTE]


    if we had him we would have been the no1 seed (cough cough Cards game )

    [/QUOTE]


    actually I could have hit that FG against the freakin Cards !!!

     

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Colts Vs. Ravens

    In response to bredbru's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    can this indy team beat denver

    [/QUOTE]


    maybe, i know balt can't

     

Share