Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    Imagine..   or rather it is a very possible reality, an 8-8 team will make the playoffs in the AFC and an 8 - 7 - 1 team could make the playoffs in the NFC while a 10 - 6, or possibly an 11 - 5, NFC team stays at home!  Just goes to show being in a crappy division can be more important than being a good team.  Happened to the Pats in 2008 and may happen to the Arizona Cardinals this season.  What's wrong with this picture?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from Cloudyandrain. Show Cloudyandrain's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    Mad about these Cardinals. They desever to be in the playoffs. most likely they are out.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from ghostofjri37. Show ghostofjri37's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to Cloudyandrain's comment:

    Mad about these Cardinals. They desever to be in the playoffs. most likely they are out.



    I think you are right. Even if they beat SF next week (assuming SF beats atl tonight) they would have to hope NO loses at home to TB.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from ccsjl. Show ccsjl's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    Was talking about that last night - Cardinals miss playoffs when an 8 win team gets in. Sad part is NO NFC NORTH team deserves to be in.....

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TheGuyWithDaThing. Show TheGuyWithDaThing's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    NFC North (and even the NFC East, really) is littered with mediocrity. Granted, the Packers would likely be no worse than 10-6 with a healthy Rodgers, but their record is their record. It's a shame that an 8-8 team might get in while an 11-5 and a 9-7 (Philly) could miss the playoffs.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from ccsjl. Show ccsjl's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    it may not be fair. If they changed it to the top 6 records in each conference - there would be a chance that a "division winner" might NOT make the playoffs - and then said fans would cry wolf too.



    Talk is to add 2 more teams and get rid of byes for top 2 seeds. Issue there is 7 and 9 teams could get in...

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from soups. Show soups's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    Just put Seattle in now.  This is all a moot point. And even then, it will take any AFC team's best game just to hold with them.

    Hate to admit it, but they are clearly the team to beat in the NFL.  That's why it's going to be so sweet when the Pats beat them.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    it may not be fair. If they changed it to the top 6 records in each conference - there would be a chance that a "division winner" might NOT make the playoffs - and then said fans would cry wolf too.



    Like the 7 - 9 Seahawks in 2010 over 10 - 6 Giants and Bucs teams!

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from soups. Show soups's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    it may not be fair. If they changed it to the top 6 records in each conference - there would be a chance that a "division winner" might NOT make the playoffs - and then said fans would cry wolf too.



    Like the 7 - 9 Seahawks in 2010 over 10 - 6 Giants and Bucs teams!



    That was crazy.  Forgot about that.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Paul_K. Show Paul_K's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    I have the Cardinals rated higher than the Patriots.  That's not just any 11-5 -- they had to play Seattle twice and San Francisco twice. 

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from ccsjl. Show ccsjl's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    In response to ccsjl's comment:

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    it may not be fair. If they changed it to the top 6 records in each conference - there would be a chance that a "division winner" might NOT make the playoffs - and then said fans would cry wolf too.



    Talk is to add 2 more teams and get rid of byes for top 2 seeds. Issue there is 7 and 9 teams could get in...



    If they added 2 more teams per conference, that would mean no more first round byes?



    Yep....

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from glenr. Show glenr's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to agcsbill's comment:

    Imagine..   or rather it is a very possible reality, an 8-8 team will make the playoffs in the AFC and an 8 - 7 - 1 team could make the playoffs in the NFC while a 10 - 6, or possibly an 11 - 5, NFC team stays at home!  Just goes to show being in a crappy division can be more important than being a good team.  Happened to the Pats in 2008 and may happen to the Arizona Cardinals this season.  What's wrong with this picture?




    I wouldn't be surprised. The NFL playoff wild cards are designed to keep fans of mediocre teams happy not to reward the 6 teams with the best records.

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from glenr. Show glenr's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to AZPAT's comment:

    In response to PhatVirgin's comment:

    it may not be fair. If they changed it to the top 6 records in each conference - there would be a chance that a "division winner" might NOT make the playoffs - and then said fans would cry wolf too.



    Please tell us why the NFL has divisions again? If not taking division winners to the playoffs, why have divisions?

    Get rid of them! Them, every team would have to play every conference team every year. The 16th game would be a cross over to the other conference, playing their peer based on final season ending positions/standings.  Problem solved! Top 6 teams make it, the top two getting the byes. Same/same for seeding.




    The NFL has divisions for several reasons. To promote rivalries and to keep the broadcast networks happy.

    Just follow the money

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    One way to lessen the chance of that happening is to say that you have to win 9 (or 10?) games to win a division title. If no one in the divison wins 9 (or 10 ?) games then there is a 3rd wild card team.

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from glenr. Show glenr's posts

    Re: Could we have another 11 - 5 team NOT make the playoffs?

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    One way to lessen the chance of that happening is to say that you have to win 9 (or 10?) games to win a division title. If no one in the divison wins 9 (or 10 ?) games then there is a 3rd wild card team.




    And the NFL will worry that they'll lose viewers from an entire section of the country.

    Once again...follow the money

     
Sections
Shortcuts