In response to TravisBean's comment:
In response to prolate0spheroid's comment:
In response to FishTaco64's comment:
I could see Browner also playing a LB type role in certain games. Namely games where the other team really only has one huge receiving threat. Then they can leave Revis on that guy, put Dennerd at the other CB spot and use Brown to pass-rush, play the run, or pick up the TE or RB. Agaianst teams like Chicago or Detroit with two very good WRs, they leave him covering the #2 WR.
Hah . . . this is funny. We sign a corner and a day later he's a safety and now he's a LB. By the end of the month, I predict he's going to be a nose tackle and no one is going to regret losing Wilfork anymore!
You've turned into quite the troll. Many are saying he can be used all over. Don't focus on the positional designation so much. Focus on the scheme or philosophy tied within the player's skill set.
You act like he doesn't have the athleticism or size to play CB, a SS or LB slot position like a Jamie Collins just did for us.
BB had Collins as a CB in man coverage and Collins held.
Wake up or go back to watching whatever sport you did before 2007, Prolate.
Funny. You call someone else a troll then go on a childish troll rant.