Dallas Clark

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Dallas Clark

    Says he wants to play this year. Should we grab him? He had a decent year for the Bucs last season despite his age.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    Says he wants to play this year. Should we grab him? He had a decent year for the Bucs last season despite his age.

     




    Ravens already snagged him


    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23108180/te-dallas-clark-signs-with-ravens

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from GoUconn13. Show GoUconn13's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to kansaspatriot's comment:

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

     

    Says he wants to play this year. Should we grab him? He had a decent year for the Bucs last season despite his age.

     




    Ravens already snagged him


    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/23108180/te-dallas-clark-signs-with-ravens




    That is becuase ravens lost Pitna for the season.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    That was quick. BB asleep at the wheel again?

     

     

     http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff6/babeparilli/gif_193x113_39ce6f_zps83b8ca29.gif?t=1373985234

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark


    Dallas Clark has been available for quite some time.  Given his past success, I am sure he was on the radar for any team seeking help at the tight end spot.  I commented that I recently saw him in Indianapolis and he looked healthy. 

    All of that said, he is relatively old for his position and has had injury issues in the past. 

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/08/11/mutual-interest-between-ravens-and-clark/

    I'd imagine that the Patriots gave it some thought and made a choice not to pursue.  Clark's been available for quite some time. 

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from Eldunker. Show Eldunker's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    more likely BB didn't want grampa Clarke.  We already have comparatively better players competing at TE.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    Clark came in last year for the Pats to take a look at him.  Apparently they didnt like what they seen then otherwise I think they would have been all over him with the Gronk situation then for sure when Hernandez got arrested.  I was wanting the Pats to bring him back again for a look.  

     

    ---------------------------------------------

    "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anybody else."  Text received by Tom Brady from Kurt Warner after Ravens loss.


    view my Patriots photoshops at patsfanfotoshop.tumblr.com





     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    TE is not a need position. 

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to UD6's comment:


    Dallas Clark has been available for quite some time.  Given his past success, I am sure he was on the radar for any team seeking help at the tight end spot.  I commented that I recently saw him in Indianapolis and he looked healthy. 

    All of that said, he is relatively old for his position and has had injury issues in the past. 

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/08/11/mutual-interest-between-ravens-and-clark/

    I'd imagine that the Patriots gave it some thought and made a choice not to pursue.  Clark's been available for quite some time. 




    Schefter just tweeted he wanted to play this year on the 11th. I don't know how "available" he's been.

     

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/366637625177677824

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from oklahomapatriot. Show oklahomapatriot's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    That was quick. BB asleep at the wheel again?

     

     

     http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff6/babeparilli/gif_193x113_39ce6f_zps83b8ca29.gif?t=1373985234

     




    LOL

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from elendil. Show elendil's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    Pats just had to cut a better TE than Clark. 

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from UD6. Show UD6's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to BabeParilli's comment:

    In response to UD6's comment:
    [QUOTE]

     


    Dallas Clark has been available for quite some time.  Given his past success, I am sure he was on the radar for any team seeking help at the tight end spot.  I commented that I recently saw him in Indianapolis and he looked healthy. 

    All of that said, he is relatively old for his position and has had injury issues in the past. 

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/08/11/mutual-interest-between-ravens-and-clark/

    I'd imagine that the Patriots gave it some thought and made a choice not to pursue.  Clark's been available for quite some time. 

     




    Schefter just tweeted he wanted to play this year on the 11th. I don't know how "available" he's been.

     

     

    https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/366637625177677824

     

    [/QUOTE]
    Until signed by the Ravens he was a free agent - thus, available. 

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Dallas Clark

    In response to russgriswold's comment:

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

     

    TE is not a need position. 

     



    No it isn't. Schiano thinks he is done and that is good enough for me.  He is done. Was ready to retire like Koppen, Stokely, etc.

     

    Baltimore is one desperate team.



    one desperate defending champion you mean

     

Share