Dana Stubblefield

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from toolfinder. Show toolfinder's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    ^^^^^ JackHole

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    Another prime example of why rusty is a huge waste of time around here - for a kick, check out the Bruin's forum - he is a laughing stalk...come to think of it he is here as well:)

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from m. a. pat. Show m. a. pat's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:

    Does everyone remember when Stubblefield was added from SF in 2004 and he didn't make the team and got hurt/retired?

     

    My question is, did Mt Hurl, Pezzy, Babe, TFB12 and that little group all mock BB for signing Stubblefield? If not, how come?  Because NE won the SB the year before and Brady was great in the postseason?

     

    Discuss:



    Training camp can't come soon enough.

     
  6. This post has been removed.

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from mthurl. Show mthurl's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    Why even start a thread like this? There's not even a connection between what you are asking, and what you wrote. It's pretty dumb, dumbo.


    Refresh my memory...back in 04 didn't we have three young first round picks playing on our defensive line? And playing well I might add. So of course adding a retread Stubbyfed didn't mean much...it's much different than say adding a guy like Fanene or Haynesworth to a defensive line that desperately needed it (and then watching them do nothing but go bust). Totally different scenarios, but you're not intelligent enough to realize that type of stuff.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsLifer. Show PatsLifer's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:

    Or lt james williams?  He also was a fa signing who did not make it.

     

    Were tools like cupcake and his group holding bb's feet to the fire back then or did brady play well in sb 38?

     

    Continue discussing how phony cupcake and his group are:



    That was before the decade drought, tens of failed draft picks, and terrible FA signings....

    discss..

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from pezz4pats. Show pezz4pats's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    In response to mthurl's comment:


    [QUOTE]


    10 years of bad signings wears on a person.  A team.


    bb shooting BB's while the big guns are firing mortars.


    No team is going to win a SB with 10 years of bad signings and some of the worst D's in History.  It's never been done.    Never will..  He didn't have 10 years to ruin the team back then.  It was just the beginning.


    Thank god he figured out he can't build a D on his own and decided to get some real talent (even if it is borrowed)


    Can't win a war, shooting blanks.


    Luckily, he's had his field general all this time to bail him out.


    If not for that, we'd be the Cleveland Indians.  DEFUNCT!


    And beebee would be coaching women's  Lacrosse.


    That is, if his daughter let him.


     


     

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    This guy is seriously mental!  Put the bottle down, Rusty!

     

    *******************************

    Be a Fan!  But don't be a Homer Fan!

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from m. a. pat. Show m. a. pat's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:

    So, did the Cupcake Group whine and moan about Stubblefield's cap hit and his retirement along with James Big Cat Williams or did they not because NE won SB 38 and Brady wasn't crappy?

    Continue discussing, because it appears the discussion has attempted to be derailed by the Cupcake Guild.



    LOL! You've got a name for everybody.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from m. a. pat. Show m. a. pat's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:

    In response to m. a. pat's comment:

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:

    So, did the Cupcake Group whine and moan about Stubblefield's cap hit and his retirement along with James Big Cat Williams or did they not because NE won SB 38 and Brady wasn't crappy?

    Continue discussing, because it appears the discussion has attempted to be derailed by the Cupcake Guild.



    LOL! You've got a name for everybody.



    It's just so easy.   Mt Hurl is one of the leaders of their group. He's a Home Ec teacher in NH.  Notice how they won't answer such a simple question.

    Were they on the internet in 2004 whining and moaning that BB's FA signings were going to destroy Brady from playing well in the postseason that year, with "dead money" and the like?

    Were they?

    Notice how they refuse to honestly answer such a simple question.  Maybe if Brady crapped himself in the 2004 postseason, they would have?



    The 2004 team was loaded with talent unlike the past few years. The D could impose their will on equally talented teams. It's never just been about Brady. It's always been a team game.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from joepatsfan111111. Show joepatsfan111111's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    Will our OL (Mankins) wake up in January?

    Why did we lose in all those postseasons? Because when the other team knew we were running the ball, we couldn't. The OL imo has failed in postseason. They have opened the flood gates on Brady too. 4th and 2 in the AFCCG this year and a possible chance to really make it tight, boom Mankins and Wendell let Knighton fly by them and kill Brady.

    If Brady gets time, he kills defenses. Yes, no doubt he has made some very very very questionable decisions in the postseasons (4 INTs vs. SD in 2007, the deep pick vs. Baltimore into double coverage in 2011, the deep ball to an unhealthy Gronk who was blanketed, missing JE last year on the deep ball), but if the OL could help est. the run in January for once and protect TB consistently its a different story

    Check out my Pats/Sports Blog:

    http://joepatsfan.blogspot.com/

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. This post has been removed.

     
  22. This post has been removed.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. You have chosen to ignore posts from joepatsfan111111. Show joepatsfan111111's posts

    Re: Dana Stubblefield

    In response to DougIrwin's comment:



    Brady gets time with a run game and playaction. Plain and simple.  HE was terrible in the 2007 AFC Title game and SB.   The days of him bobbing up and down for 10 seconds in the pocket because of Moss and Welker are long, long gone.

    The more predictable Brady is in preferring plays with certain personnel, the more players can impose their will on Logan Mankins. I don't care if John Hannah was here.

    It has got to stop and I've warned about it for years.  Why do you and others keep ignoring the idea that Brady thinks he can throw with others who have more finesse personnel?  

    Most of the time it can work, but it's that one game, that one day, and that's all she wrote.   Take the pressure off the O Line, please.

    Well they haven't imposed their will with the run game in the playoffs in years.

    Brady doesn't run block and Brady doesn't have a 100% say in the gameplan and play call, talk to the coaching staff

 
  • This post has been removed.

     
  • Sections
    Shortcuts