Danny Woodhead to Return?

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Danny Woodhead to Return?

    In response to mia76's comment:

    No on Bush - he is a 1000 yd back but needs and wants to be the lead back not a 3rd down specialist and he probably has a few more years as such and will be paid for that.

    On Woody - love him and would like to see him back. I will be curious what his market is. ESPN suggested 3 yr/3M which is what BJGE got last year but to be a feature back. I see Woody more in the 2M/yr range and maybe a little less. At 1.5M I could see the Pats resigning him. He is a really good 3rd down back with an uncany ability to wriggle for 1st downs and decent receiver skills. And you can depend on his blitz pick-up which is where Vereen is still learning.

    With Ridley, Vereen, Bolden, and Demps under contract I don't see the Pats really looking for RBs unless they find a steal later in FA. The backs they have are all very young and developing, bringing in a 'name' FA would stunt their growth and probably not greatly increase the overall production. This is not the situation of years before where the FA pick-ups were because the roster was pretty bare.



    same #s i was offering a few months ago adn agree wtih rest.

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Danny Woodhead to Return?

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    I thought I read Demps was going to pursue track... And so he might not even be here.



    track ends about time of mandatory camp

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: Danny Woodhead to Return?

    In response to mthurl's comment:

     

    Woodhead's a good player that will help some team out there, I just don't think it will be us. We drafted Vareen - it's time for some of these draft picks to step up and fill the void.

     



    agreed. they havent played any of them enough since we got them

     

     

Share