Notice: All Boston.com forums will be retired as of May 31st, 2016 and will not be archived. Thank you for your participation in this community, and we hope you continue to enjoy other content at Boston.com.

Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TFB12's comment:

    Correct me if I am wrong but last I looked the Patriots have 13 rookies on the 53 man roster, many who will have significant playing time and expectations, and 7 rookies on the practice squad.  Can we expect a SB victory with this?  I would laugh if it was any other team.  Than k goodness for TFB, he is the great equalizer.  But still that that's asking a lot even from a HOF QB.

     

    ---------------------------------------------

    "Being the best doesn't mean you always win. It just means you win more than anybody else."  Text received by Tom Brady from Kurt Warner after Ravens loss.


    view my Patriots photoshops at patsfanfotoshop.tumblr.com





    TFB, READY? In the PATRIOTS last two Superbowls:

    2007 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 14-ROOKS!

    2011 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 12-ROOKS!

    Glad to see Bill taking note! Sorry my brutha..........but us having 13-ROOKS this year sounds just about right!

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from TexasPat. Show TexasPat's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to RallyC's comment:

    In response to TexasPat's comment:

     

        TPat, just like the pit crew chief tinkers with the engine of the race car just minutes up to a race, Bill is an anal perfectionist who is looking for every little tweak, mix for even the smallest strategic and tactical advantage. You can bet some of his moves aren't even intended for relevance on the filed but are likely in order to play the GM game by moving pieces around for further financial considerations and even roster flexibility/trades. I'd be worried more if he didn't tinker like this. The dude is like that OCD person that you know, but thank God they are OCD because Lord knows what it would be without them doing what they do as a result of their nervous habit. I love this roster and what BB is doing this year......



         Response: Not buying it. But, BB could have decided to cut Mulligan because Gronk may be ready sooner than expected.

         Though the Ravens get blown away in Denver, FB Vontae Leach was one of the few Ravens who played effectively.  Perhaps this made BB think twice about the value of having a good FB.

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from dwhite1220. Show dwhite1220's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TexasPat's comment:

    In response to RallyC's comment:

     

    In response to TexasPat's comment:

     

        TPat, just like the pit crew chief tinkers with the engine of the race car just minutes up to a race, Bill is an anal perfectionist who is looking for every little tweak, mix for even the smallest strategic and tactical advantage. You can bet some of his moves aren't even intended for relevance on the filed but are likely in order to play the GM game by moving pieces around for further financial considerations and even roster flexibility/trades. I'd be worried more if he didn't tinker like this. The dude is like that OCD person that you know, but thank God they are OCD because Lord knows what it would be without them doing what they do as a result of their nervous habit. I love this roster and what BB is doing this year......

     



         Response: Not buying it. But, BB could have decided to cut Mulligan because Gronk may be ready sooner than expected.

     

         Though the Ravens get blown away in Denver, FB Vontae Leach was one of the few Ravens who played effectively.  Perhaps this made BB think twice about the value of having a good FB.

     




    We could've signed Leach in the first place!

     

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to RallyC's comment:

     

    TFB, READY? In the PATRIOTS last two Superbowls:

    2007 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 14-ROOKS!

    2011 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 12-ROOKS!

    Glad to see Bill taking note! Sorry my brutha..........but us having 13-ROOKS this year sounds just about right!




    Could you please let me know how many of those rooks got the playing time ours will?  I assume not many if any.  I will wait right here for you to get back to me. Thanks buddy!

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TexasPat's comment:

         If the 2013 Pats' roster is BB's best in years, than why is he continuously tinkering with it? Today, he released TE Mulligan, who he had just signed two days ago, and center Braxton Cave, creating two roster spots...one of which was used to resign FB James Develin: http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4748111/source-fb-develin-to-be-re-signed




    Do they even have a full roster yet?  Last I counted they were short.  Maybe trade or bring in a safety or CB or Dline depth.  Crazy.  Maybe Adrian Peterson can drink from the fountain of youth and have some dear antler spray to get back on the field and play like he did years ago.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TexasPat's comment:
    [QUOTE]

         If the 2013 Pats' roster is BB's best in years, than why is he continuously tinkering with it? Today, he released TE Mulligan, who he had just signed two days ago, and center Braxton Cave, creating two roster spots...one of which was used to resign FB James Develin: http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4748111/source-fb-develin-to-be-re-signed

    [/QUOTE

    When does BB not do this?

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from TexasPat. Show TexasPat's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TrueChamp's comment:

     

    In response to TexasPat's comment:
    [QUOTE]

         If the 2013 Pats' roster is BB's best in years, than why is he continuously tinkering with it? Today, he released TE Mulligan, who he had just signed two days ago, and center Braxton Cave, creating two roster spots...one of which was used to resign FB James Develin: http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/new-england-patriots/post/_/id/4748111/source-fb-develin-to-be-re-signed

    [/QUOTE

    When does BB not do this?

     



         No...when has BB done this? I don't recall so many last minute roster changes as we're seeing this year.

     

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TFB12's comment:

     

    In response to RallyC's comment: 

    TFB, READY? In the PATRIOTS last two Superbowls:

    2007 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 14-ROOKS!

    2011 lost SUPERBOWL to the NY GIANTS who had 12-ROOKS!

    Glad to see Bill taking note! Sorry my brutha..........but us having 13-ROOKS this year sounds just about right!

     


    Could you please let me know how many of those rooks got the playing time ours will?  I assume not many if any.  I will wait right here for you to get back to me. Thanks buddy!

     

     

     

    TFB, that is an exercise in futility. All that matters is how they perform. Based on BB's assement I trust that the ROOKS who play a lot this season, deserve it.

     

    WE returned 10-starters to the D this season, but have added high quality depth and ROOKS who can really play. Another full year of chemistry building in 2012 will reap clear benefits for this season.

    WE returned 8-starters to the #1 ranked offense in the NFL last season while losing AH, WW, and BL. Both BL and WW were basically dismissed from the team due to BB and staff's assessment of decreased value and slipping performace. As we see from both of their market value, the league agrees with BB. KT, AD, ZS, JE, VEREEN, AD, and Boyce bring much more diversity and skill when being thrown to by TB. We aren't asking that much from our unusually talented, atheltic, ROOKS being that TB is their QB.

    All I'm telling you is that our ROOKS who are gonna get all this playing time that you are referring to are RECEIVERS and TB can turn ANYBODY who has great talent and work ethic into a household name. So, our ROOKS, (receivers) have a great advantage as they have TB. One poster here even made the comment that WW was Tom's security blanket and that it was good to see Wes go. Well, if we are to take advantage of the potential that these kids clearly have, then that thinking is pretty true. Necessity is the mohter of invention. I think WW has a negative effect on Manning's psyche in the end also........just a hunch. Of course, if he keeps dropping balls on big plays, Peyton won't likelly have as much patience.......LOL! 

    The rest of the team is pretty much vets..........with some rookie depth. What other rooks are you referring to? Collins? He is a superstar in the making and should be playing.......Who else is gonna be loaded with playing time as a ROOK?

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from wozzy. Show wozzy's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to TexasPat's comment:

    No...when has BB done this? I don't recall so many last minute roster changes as we're seeing this year.

     



    This happens all the time, the Aikens and Tracy Whites of the world can get cut and resigned three or five times in a season.  Coaches use this part of the preseason to take a look at as many free agents possible as well as those cut from other teams, not simply to sign somebody but to to see them up close in case we need to sign somebody because a player gets hurt.  If Gronk (heaven forbid) gets injured again it would not be strange if we saw Fells, Ballard or this Mulligan kid back on the roster... it's better to know in advance which free agents are out there and what their skill set is.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    OK, I'm an unabashed homer, but very likely MUCH better at WR, about the same at TE, better at RB, better front seven, everywhere else comparable.

    WR: Last year there was Welker who was Welker, which is to say an outstanding slot receiver, perhaps the best ever. Then there was Lloyd, who was nothing special, a disappointment some would say. Then there was....ummm....er.... Oh yeah, Branch! Love the guy, but he was spent. 

    This year, there is enormous potential. If they reach anything close to that potential, they're just a much better and deeper group than last year. Sure, some of that hinges on Amendola's health, but every team in the league has "ifs".

    TE: Gronk is back, that's pretty much all you need to know. Can Sudfeld replace Hern's production. Why not, he looked like the real deal in the preseason, and as good as Hern was in the open field, he had alligator arms at times, was an indifferent blocker (to be kind) and was not durable. I guess if you want to be negative, you can find it here (Gronk's health, Sudfeld is a rook), but I feel fine about that position.

    RB: Better because of depth and experience. I think it's expected that in the absence of Woody, Vereen will play a much larger role this year, and based on what I've seen that's a good thing. He's bigger, stronger and more athletic than Woody, who was willing but limited. Vereen's ceiling is much higher. Does anybody think that if Vereen gets the touches Woody got, he won't be more productive? 

    Front Seven: It can't be overstated, in my view, that Jones and Hightower are no longer rookies. The rookie wall is a real deal, and their confidence, technique, strength will all be better. Those are two blue chip cats who will be significantly better. The depth at LB, the athleticism of Collins, who will eventually be a guy that will need to be accounted for. The addition of Kelly...I see that as a solid group, quite a bit better than last year.

    I don't see any other positional area that has changed much, for better or worse, from 2012.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: Do YOU think our roster is better then it's been for the last 3 years. Yes or no.

    In response to Muzwell's comment:

    OK, I'm an unabashed homer, but very likely MUCH better at WR, about the same at TE, better at RB, better front seven, everywhere else comparable.

    WR: Last year there was Welker who was Welker, which is to say an outstanding slot receiver, perhaps the best ever. Then there was Lloyd, who was nothing special, a disappointment some would say. Then there was....ummm....er.... Oh yeah, Branch! Love the guy, but he was spent. 

    This year, there is enormous potential. If they reach anything close to that potential, they're just a much better and deeper group than last year. Sure, some of that hinges on Amendola's health, but every team in the league has "ifs".

    TE: Gronk is back, that's pretty much all you need to know. Can Sudfeld replace Hern's production. Why not, he looked like the real deal in the preseason, and as good as Hern was in the open field, he had alligator arms at times, was an indifferent blocker (to be kind) and was not durable. I guess if you want to be negative, you can find it here (Gronk's health, Sudfeld is a rook), but I feel fine about that position.

    RB: Better because of depth and experience. I think it's expected that in the absence of Woody, Vereen will play a much larger role this year, and based on what I've seen that's a good thing. He's bigger, stronger and more athletic than Woody, who was willing but limited. Vereen's ceiling is much higher. Does anybody think that if Vereen gets the touches Woody got, he won't be more productive? 

    Front Seven: It can't be overstated, in my view, that Jones and Hightower are no longer rookies. The rookie wall is a real deal, and their confidence, technique, strength will all be better. Those are two blue chip cats who will be significantly better. The depth at LB, the athleticism of Collins, who will eventually be a guy that will need to be accounted for. The addition of Kelly...I see that as a solid group, quite a bit better than last year.

    I don't see any other positional area that has changed much, for better or worse, from 2012.




    A very well reasoned post. Every team has concerns, but our main concerns are health, and depth at only 1 or 2 positions. SS is the weakest position on our team and I am really starting to wonder if Jamie Collins is not the answer to the A Wilson/Rodney SS/LB hybrid. This guy is a perfect fit. 6'3 with unbelievable athleticism, and imo is more then fluid enough to fill that role.

    Tommy Kelly is the best thing we have had next to Wilfork since Seymour was traded. More importantly as you say, another year of development for not only Hightower, and Jones, but also Talib, Gregory, and Dennard get another year in the system. Continuity in the defense will be better this year. We have many starters returning on offense and defense but everybody wants to talk about the receivers when imo it isn't much of a concern.

    I must be a homer because this team looks like a contender to me. BB has done it again...for a 13th year.

     
Sections
Shortcuts