Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
-
Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 5:52 AM EST
With the Giants winning the Super Bowl after a 9 win regular season, and the decision to play a Super Bowl in New York in two years, maybe it's time to allow the team with the better regular season record to host the Super Bowl. Playing a Super Bowl in New York eliminates the old adage that.... you have to play the Super Bowl in an indoor stadium or a warm weather city. So why not reward the team with the better regular season record?
-
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 6:43 AM EST
I think it'd be good to see a SB played in cold weather in the elements....like a snow bowl.... -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 7:13 AM EST
Bubba, I was just putting it out there to see what others thought. I remeber watching the Steelers defeat the Vikings at Tulane Stadium, in Super Bowl 9, and the Temperature was 46 degrees. Dallas beat Miami 24-3 in Super Bowl 6, and the temperature at kickoff time was 39 degrees (The coldest kickoff Temp. in Super Bowl History) I'm like you, would love to see a 'Snow Bowl'! -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 7:15 AM EST
I'd like to see the SB hosted in the city of the previous years SB winner. Kind of like a bonus, if you win the SB next year you host it -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 8:03 AM EST
Nah, I would have to disagree with the best record gets HFA for SB as well. I like the way it's set up now, by grabbing Home Field with the best Conference Record. Also, you can look at the teams 'conference' record to break ties and so on...
Taking it a step further....
what happens IF the Steelers and say Packers got a 12-4 (perhaps even a 3rd team as well) record and these are the best records for the year and they didnt' play each other in reg season - who would get Home Field? how would have a fair tiebreaker? I don't think this would work. -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 8:34 AM EST
Noise...Good point, didn't think of that...thanks for the good post -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 8:50 AM EST
In Response to Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl:With the Giants winning the Super Bowl after a 9 win regular season, and the decision to play a Super Bowl in New York in two years, maybe it's time to allow the team with the better regular season record to host the Super Bowl. Playing a Super Bowl in New York eliminates the old adage that.... you have to play the Super Bowl in an indoor stadium or a warm weather city. So why not reward the team with the better regular season record?
Posted by Steelcurtain75
I was thinking the same think, Steel. Here in Maryland, it was in the high 40's and sunny on Sunday.. perfect for a football game in the open air of an outdoor stadium. That would be the TRUE test of a team to play in the elements! Like the old days! -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 8:56 AM EST
Never happen. There's too much money involved. Too much planning that needs to occur. Just think about the number of hotel rooms that need to be reserved, traffic at airports, etc. -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 9:18 AM EST
In Response to Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl:Never happen. There's too much money involved. Too much planning that needs to occur. Just think about the number of hotel rooms that need to be reserved, traffic at airports, etc.
Posted by DirtyWaterLover
Yep. All the stupid pre game halftime shows etc..They aren't going to risk snow or rain every year. Not going to happen on top of hotels etc... -
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 11:03 AM EST
In Response to Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl:With the Giants winning the Super Bowl after a 9 win regular season, and the decision to play a Super Bowl in New York in two years, maybe it's time to allow the team with the better regular season record to host the Super Bowl. Playing a Super Bowl in New York eliminates the old adage that.... you have to play the Super Bowl in an indoor stadium or a warm weather city. So why not reward the team with the better regular season record?
Posted by Steelcurtain75
Anywhere but Indy, that town is barely on the map. Im suprised the stadium was full. -
This post has been removed.
-
Re: Earning Home Field Advantage For Super Bowl
posted at 2/7/2012 11:37 AM EST
Just a thought.Wonder if John Henry has a nice stadium accross the Pond. Maybe a nuetral site in our mother country of Britain. A nice jesture by the former colonies !!LOL !#$%$%^&*()(_*)(&*%&^$%$#@#$^%*^&)*(_Hetchinspete.