Re: Edelman > Welker!?
posted at 9/25/2013 2:21 PM EDT
In response to TFB12's comment:
In response to Getzo's comment:
I knew you'd offer something outside of how I look at it, so I was glad you showed up because you offer another aspect to the conversation in a tasteful way.
Just for the record I always stayed by Amendola's side! I bet you're 100% right about those praising him now, wanted him cutt just last year or even this off season...
I already posted their stats btw, I just wanted to make the point the guy is a talented player even though not on Welkers level.
You meant Edelman, correct?
Good discussion, Getzo. People get to butt hurt around here. I have mentioned many times about how much I like Edelman and like Amendola. They had no say on Welker leaving so I hold nothing against those two. I want the to succeed but as I have also mentioned they do have some faults. Amendola is injured again, Edelman luckily isn't and I hoep he doesn't get injured. I hope his game does improve to be Welker like. He needs better separation, better awareness, be able to make better adjustments when the ball is in the air, and get some good YAC and longer receptions. He has been solid through these 3 games, no doubt. Good for him because I like the dude!
LOL, well I guess I stand by Amendola's side too!!! Yeah I meant Edelman, lol.
I guess I have had too stick up for Ridley, Edelman, Amendola, Gregory... ect.. no one is saying these guys are elite players, but they absolutely are important on a team aspect. Without these guys, we don't win games. They young receivers are growing and improving every single game...
The arrow is pointing up in NE! This will be a tough stretch for NE but if they play 60 minutes they will continue to be an improving team regardless of win or lose, as long as they grow and improve.