Edelman = Welker

  1. This post has been removed.

     
  2. This post has been removed.

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:

    In response to RallyC's comment:

    Cleanup in theatre 3 BUSTCHISE! Pee Wee Hermann made another mess for ya!



    I don't know why you crack on that guys job. At least he is working.

    And not on a forum pretending to have played in the NFL.

     



    Cleanup in theatre 3 BUSTCHISE! Pee Wee Hermann made another mess for ya!

     

     
  4. This post has been removed.

     
  5. This post has been removed.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:

     

    I think Rallyc is having a meltdown. 

    Becareful, don't stroke out on us here.

    What NFL team did you used to play for?

     




     

    Why would I tell you Bustchise. I gain nothing. just know its true fool. Meltdown? Dude, get a clue. Im just controlling you like a puppet right now. LOL!

     
  7. This post has been removed.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to DeadAhead's comment:

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:

    In response to RallyC's comment:

    Cleanup in theatre 3 BUSTCHISE! Pee Wee Hermann made another mess for ya!



    I don't know why you crack on that guys job. At least he is working.

    And not on a forum pretending to have played in the NFL.

     



    Posting from the theater again, Bustchise, are we? Tsk Tsk! I know those night shifts are tough, but pay attention to the customer!



    Lol!

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from TFB12. Show TFB12's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:

    I think Rallyc is having a meltdown. 

    Becareful, don't stroke out on us here.

    What NFL team did you used to play for?




    LMAO!!  Dude, he never played football.  You can tell by his posts on this forum.  I think he means he played Futbol, not football!

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    Rally and Rusty.

    What a couple of complete and total losers.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from RallyC. Show RallyC's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:

    Rally and Rusty.

    What a couple of complete and total losers.




    PATRIOTS 34 BRONCOS 31

    JE, 110yrds, 9-catches, 2-TDs

    WESSIE , 31yrds, 4-catches, ZERO TDs and yet ANOTHER FATAL CHOKE LOL!

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTS. Show BostonTS's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    Rusty you left out: 

    6. He is frequently injured (unlike Welker). 

    Unfortunately that is a huge fact that colors your unique brand of homerism in this analysis. 

    I do like Edelman a lot and if he can stay on the field he can be a very impactful player, so here's hoping he can do that. He seems to relish big game pressure also. 

     

     
  14. This post has been removed.

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. This post has been removed.

     
  17. This post has been removed.

     
  18. This post has been removed.

     
  19. This post has been removed.

     
  20. This post has been removed.

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bungalow-Bill. Show Bungalow-Bill's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    In response to DeadAhead's comment:

    It's too late now. Everyone here, at least those are real and genuine fans know my premise and know it to be true. That's why some who have hounded me for years, have backed off. They see it now, too.

     



    Delusional. They see it now too? How is that exactly? The best RB on the team has been benched in half the games this year if you haven't noticed so why is this year any different than previous years? It looks like they are going to have to rely on the passing game pretty heavily again.

    Question, how many games did they lose in the regular season in the 6 years Welker was here, Einstein? 20 out of 96 (79 win %) versus 3 out of 11 so far without Welker (72.7 win %). Yep, this proves that you were right again. LOL. 

    As I have said before not one thing that you've spouted off about on this subject has been proven until the playoffs are played. If they end up going one and done without WW what will your new reason be?

    Nevermind, why would I even ask that Undecided

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from Bungalow-Bill. Show Bungalow-Bill's posts

    Re: Edelman = Welker

    And instead of your typical hi bustchise waste of time response, how about you sack up and actually respond to my post.

     
  23. This post has been removed.

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
Sections
Shortcuts