I didn't think Welker was an option, didn't think Talib was an option but I thought for sure Seabass would be tagged.
Maybe things are going good on the contract talks.
Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 4:51 PM EST
I didn't think Welker was an option, didn't think Talib was an option but I thought for sure Seabass would be tagged.
Maybe things are going good on the contract talks.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 4:52 PM EST
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 4:55 PM EST
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
TFB12 contributes more to this board than you will ever contribute to anything in your useless life.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 4:59 PM EST
I think I am nervous on the Talib situation. I believe his agent feels big offers will be available, and Talib does not need another 1 year deal with the Pats...
Obviously Pats feel otherwise...will be interesting to see who read the market correctly.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 5:05 PM EST
Interesting... funny how off season can be as exciting as the regular season though!
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 5:48 PM EST
In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
hey Leon, how many intelligent things have you posted on here since you've been here? by my count, you're still at zero.
TFB12 contributes more to this board than you will ever contribute to anything in your useless life.
I love clever come backs! LOL, Thanks for my evening chuckle!
This post has been removed.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 5:55 PM EST
In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
hey Leon, how many intelligent things have you posted on here since you've been here? by my count, you're still at zero.
TFB12 contributes more to this board than you will ever contribute to anything in your useless life.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 5:58 PM EST
In response to BostonProSportsLover's comment:
In response to TFB12's comment:
I didn't think Welker was an option, didn't think Talib was an option but I thought for sure Seabass would be tagged.
Maybe things are going good on the contract talks.
really bad for us with wes.. odds are now higher that a cash rich team like san fran could swoop in with $55m offer for 5 years with 24m GUARANTEED!
I guess the Pats not using the tag on any one means they are confident they can retain the players that they want back. Which is a good thing right?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 6:00 PM EST
In response to NoMorePensionLooting's comment:
In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
hey Leon, how many intelligent things have you posted on here since you've been here? by my count, you're still at zero.
TFB12 contributes more to this board than you will ever contribute to anything in your useless life.
I love clever come backs! LOL, Thanks for my evening chuckle!
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 6:06 PM EST
In response to xXR3S1NXx's comment:
In response to BostonProSportsLover's comment:
In response to TFB12's comment:
I didn't think Welker was an option, didn't think Talib was an option but I thought for sure Seabass would be tagged.
Maybe things are going good on the contract talks.
really bad for us with wes.. odds are now higher that a cash rich team like san fran could swoop in with $55m offer for 5 years with 24m GUARANTEED!
Let san fran be stupid and try to sign welker for that much money. Makes them less threatening down the road when they have tons of money tied up in an aging player who will likely underproduce in the later years of that contract.
I guess the Pats not using the tag on any one means they are confident they can retain the players that they want back. Which is a good thing right?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 6:18 PM EST
im surprised they didnt use the tag on seabass....hopefully this means the contract talks are going well with the three players, like TFB said.
very interesting offseason already and its just started!
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 6:42 PM EST
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 6:43 PM EST
In response to redsoxfan94's comment:
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
hey Leon, how many intelligent things have you posted on here since you've been here? by my count, you're still at zero.
TFB12 contributes more to this board than you will ever contribute to anything in your useless life.
Thanks redsoxfan94. Looks like Leon got owned again!!
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 7:47 PM EST

Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 9:54 PM EST
In response to xXR3S1NXx's comment:
In response to BostonProSportsLover's comment:
In response to TFB12's comment:
I didn't think Welker was an option, didn't think Talib was an option but I thought for sure Seabass would be tagged.
Maybe things are going good on the contract talks.
really bad for us with wes.. odds are now higher that a cash rich team like san fran could swoop in with $55m offer for 5 years with 24m GUARANTEED!
Let san fran be stupid and try to sign welker for that much money. Makes them less threatening down the road when they have tons of money tied up in an aging player who will likely underproduce in the later years of that contract.
I guess the Pats not using the tag on any one means they are confident they can retain the players that they want back. Which is a good thing right?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/4/2013 10:59 PM EST
In response to JRABBB's comment:
Hey TFB -How many threads have you started since 1-1-13?
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 8:05 AM EST
Not really shocked no one got the tage. I'd love to have all back but at the right price and none of those prices are higher then the tag.
For Vollmer, the tag is for LT money and I know a coupe of RT's got paid but I don't think what he's going to command will be as much. If they are looking for something long term it's better to let him test the market and come back with a deal that is lower then the tag hit and sign him then.
For Wes, love the guy but if someone wants to give him $55mil and 5 years well good luck to him. He's a great player for the Pats but not for that much.
For Talib, the market is flooded with CB's in Talib's tier: Houston, DRC, Robinson, Smith, Lewis, Grimes, Talib. I don't think his market is going to be nearly as deep as people think
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 8:48 AM EST
In response to PatsEng's comment:
Not really shocked no one got the tage. I'd love to have all back but at the right price and none of those prices are higher then the tag.
For Vollmer, the tag is for LT money and I know a coupe of RT's got paid but I don't think what he's going to command will be as much. If they are looking for something long term it's better to let him test the market and come back with a deal that is lower then the tag hit and sign him then.
For Wes, love the guy but if someone wants to give him $55mil and 5 years well good luck to him. He's a great player for the Pats but not for that much.
For Talib, the market is flooded with CB's in Talib's tier: Houston, DRC, Robinson, Smith, Lewis, Grimes, Talib. I don't think his market is going to be nearly as deep as people think
I think Talib is a bigger and more physical CB that is a better tackler than most CB's. I do think he fits in the top 5 tier for CB's, but his off field issues will take some teams out of contention.
I actually do not think the Pats would have had interest in Talib if he did not play with them this past season. I think the Pats know what they have in Talib, and feel they can work with him.
I think the Pats trepidation is not with the $$ but with the length and guarantee's. Thats why I thought 1 year at $8-$9 would have been something of interest to the Pats, but Talib's agent obviously feels better offers will be out there in spite of the glut.
If I am the Pats, even 2/$16-$18 with $10 guaranteed works, but again it appears Talib feels better is available
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 9:12 AM EST
In response to rkarp's comment:
In response to PatsEng's comment:
Not really shocked no one got the tage. I'd love to have all back but at the right price and none of those prices are higher then the tag.
For Vollmer, the tag is for LT money and I know a coupe of RT's got paid but I don't think what he's going to command will be as much. If they are looking for something long term it's better to let him test the market and come back with a deal that is lower then the tag hit and sign him then.
For Wes, love the guy but if someone wants to give him $55mil and 5 years well good luck to him. He's a great player for the Pats but not for that much.
For Talib, the market is flooded with CB's in Talib's tier: Houston, DRC, Robinson, Smith, Lewis, Grimes, Talib. I don't think his market is going to be nearly as deep as people think
I think Talib is a bigger and more physical CB that is a better tackler than most CB's. I do think he fits in the top 5 tier for CB's, but his off field issues will take some teams out of contention.
I actually do not think the Pats would have had interest in Talib if he did not play with them this past season. I think the Pats know what they have in Talib, and feel they can work with him.
I think the Pats trepidation is not with the $$ but with the length and guarantee's. Thats why I thought 1 year at $8-$9 would have been something of interest to the Pats, but Talib's agent obviously feels better offers will be out there in spite of the glut.
If I am the Pats, even 2/$16-$18 with $10 guaranteed works, but again it appears Talib feels better is available
When you start to add all that up and even with his high talent it doesn't look as good as a solid stable corner. DRC has the ability to perform the same on the field without the PED and off-field issues. Houston and Lewis, though not as talented, are more stable/consistent and less of an off-field concern. Grimes is a health concern same as Talib without all the other stuff. There are plenty of options out there and Talib is in the middle of the them because of all his issues. Now we saw him play and really any starting caliber CB would have improved this secondary last year so I think we are over valuing him. I'm thinking he'll get closer to a $5-6mil prove it contract maybe for 1-2 years.
This post has been removed.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 10:05 AM EST
In response to PatsEng's comment:
In response to rkarp's comment:
In response to PatsEng's comment:
Not really shocked no one got the tage. I'd love to have all back but at the right price and none of those prices are higher then the tag.
For Vollmer, the tag is for LT money and I know a coupe of RT's got paid but I don't think what he's going to command will be as much. If they are looking for something long term it's better to let him test the market and come back with a deal that is lower then the tag hit and sign him then.
For Wes, love the guy but if someone wants to give him $55mil and 5 years well good luck to him. He's a great player for the Pats but not for that much.
For Talib, the market is flooded with CB's in Talib's tier: Houston, DRC, Robinson, Smith, Lewis, Grimes, Talib. I don't think his market is going to be nearly as deep as people think
I think Talib is a bigger and more physical CB that is a better tackler than most CB's. I do think he fits in the top 5 tier for CB's, but his off field issues will take some teams out of contention.
I actually do not think the Pats would have had interest in Talib if he did not play with them this past season. I think the Pats know what they have in Talib, and feel they can work with him.
I think the Pats trepidation is not with the $$ but with the length and guarantee's. Thats why I thought 1 year at $8-$9 would have been something of interest to the Pats, but Talib's agent obviously feels better offers will be out there in spite of the glut.
If I am the Pats, even 2/$16-$18 with $10 guaranteed works, but again it appears Talib feels better is available
I think you are way over estimating what Talib is going to get on the market. Lets face it, yes Talib is one of the better CBs when he's on his game but a number of factors need to be taken into account.
When you start to add all that up and even with his high talent it doesn't look as good as a solid stable corner. DRC has the ability to perform the same on the field without the PED and off-field issues. Houston and Lewis, though not as talented, are more stable/consistent and less of an off-field concern. Grimes is a health concern same as Talib without all the other stuff. There are plenty of options out there and Talib is in the middle of the them because of all his issues. Now we saw him play and really any starting caliber CB would have improved this secondary last year so I think we are over valuing him. I'm thinking he'll get closer to a $5-6mil prove it contract maybe for 1-2 years.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 10:37 AM EST
PatsEng - great post.
Pats made basically four moves in the defensive backfield when Talib came in:
1. Devon to safety - an upgrade
2. Dennard to starting outside CB - an upgrade
3. Arrington to slot CB - an upgrade
4. Talib - an upgrade? Not sure he actually performed personally any better than Devon did, but with the other changes including better safety support for him from Devon we all look at Talib as the 'reason.'
With the above changes there was also a big change in the front 7 with more pressure packages. The defense as a whole became more aggressive.
When you actually look at the regular season stats for Talib - 1 interception and 2 passes defensed in 6 games it isn't exactly stunning. And when PFF ran their CB review, the QB rating when throwing at Talib was I believe over 100. They had him rated solidly in the middle of the pack overall.
I think he is talented and inconsistent and would not mind seeing him back at the right price, but there are a number of other options in FA that are equally effective whether they have his athletic ability or not. The list might include: Grimes, Lewis, Smith, DRC, Houston, Cox, and maybe four or five others. And none of them have as much baggage as Talib. A few of those CBs will sign for 8+M per year, but some will be in the 6-8M range and a few may be in the 3-6M range. And because they have less baggage it is much easier to structure a 3-5 yr deal that lowers the early cap hits to more manageable numbers. With Talib - the last thing you want to give him is a large signing bonus which means his cap hit is going to be very close to his average salary on any contract he signs.
Re: Franchise tag not used by the Patriots
posted at 3/5/2013 10:39 AM EST
In response to PatsEng's comment:
In response to rkarp's comment:
In response to PatsEng's comment:
Not really shocked no one got the tage. I'd love to have all back but at the right price and none of those prices are higher then the tag.
For Vollmer, the tag is for LT money and I know a coupe of RT's got paid but I don't think what he's going to command will be as much. If they are looking for something long term it's better to let him test the market and come back with a deal that is lower then the tag hit and sign him then.
For Wes, love the guy but if someone wants to give him $55mil and 5 years well good luck to him. He's a great player for the Pats but not for that much.
For Talib, the market is flooded with CB's in Talib's tier: Houston, DRC, Robinson, Smith, Lewis, Grimes, Talib. I don't think his market is going to be nearly as deep as people think
I think Talib is a bigger and more physical CB that is a better tackler than most CB's. I do think he fits in the top 5 tier for CB's, but his off field issues will take some teams out of contention.
I actually do not think the Pats would have had interest in Talib if he did not play with them this past season. I think the Pats know what they have in Talib, and feel they can work with him.
I think the Pats trepidation is not with the $$ but with the length and guarantee's. Thats why I thought 1 year at $8-$9 would have been something of interest to the Pats, but Talib's agent obviously feels better offers will be out there in spite of the glut.
If I am the Pats, even 2/$16-$18 with $10 guaranteed works, but again it appears Talib feels better is available
I think you are way over estimating what Talib is going to get on the market. Lets face it, yes Talib is one of the better CBs when he's on his game but a number of factors need to be taken into account.
When you start to add all that up and even with his high talent it doesn't look as good as a solid stable corner. DRC has the ability to perform the same on the field without the PED and off-field issues. Houston and Lewis, though not as talented, are more stable/consistent and less of an off-field concern. Grimes is a health concern same as Talib without all the other stuff. There are plenty of options out there and Talib is in the middle of the them because of all his issues. Now we saw him play and really any starting caliber CB would have improved this secondary last year so I think we are over valuing him. I'm thinking he'll get closer to a $5-6mil prove it contract maybe for 1-2 years.
Talib's injury history shows nothing major, mostly hamstring and tendon issues. He has age and size on his side. He has also shown that not only can he play the Pats system, but he can be game planned for a particular opposing team.
I thought DRC played very poorly last year. I do like Grimes in that top tier, but I think his cost is just as high, or higher than Talib.
I would hate to see the Pats try and get a CB for middling or bottom $$$'s. I thought they did that last year with Gregory. Gregory was a 3rd safety in a rotation, forced to start with the Pats due to others poor play. Pats need a big, physical CB that can be game planned to jam and play big time WR's one on one much of a game. They need a CB that can tackle.
Talib is not Revis, but we know what he is, what he can and cant do. I hope the Pats can retain him.
This post has been removed.