In response to PatsLifer's comment:
In response to FrankDooley's comment:
Stop positing repeat info with drama-infused garbage sourced from Glazer.
We were already told 4-6, so nothing is worse than originally reported from 2 days ago.
Are you people this stupid? JUst because Glazer frames his piece in a more dark tone, somehow something has changed?
Those are not major sources, dummy. They are also pickinng Glazer's sensationalized piece. Nothing has changed. They're speculating on the injury.
4-6 weeks isa huge chunk of time especially given the fact he only played in 1 game.
When you commit to paying Danny what we did, you commit to him being a centerpiece of the offense. Not EdElman. If Edelman was thought to be ce ter piece, they would have paid him like they paid Danny. Now bb is backed into a corner because his amendola investment didn't pan out as intended, his rooks are slow at picking things up, Gronk is still hurt and he has to feature a converted QB on offense as a WR. that is not a good thing, and to put any positive spin on it is simply being a bb koolaid drinker.
i don't understand how you think that in any situation, Edelman as our #1 is a good thing.
Amendola probably wasn't brought in to be a centerpiece of the offense. He was probably brought in to be a complementary piece of a diversified passing attack where no one receiver is the centerpiece or main guy. The Pats have tried the "centerpiece/main guy" style of offense and it hasn't worked. So they probably decided to go back to the open guy philosophy where no one will get good fantasy football numbers but the o will be nearly impossible to stop when a score is needed. They won three superbowls that way with that kind of offense.