GRONK ON PUP

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    GRONK ON PUP

    So Sudfeld, Ballard, Fells and Houman all make it (or the FB for Hooma or Fells).

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from grego84. Show grego84's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    So Sudfeld, Ballard, Fells and Houman all make it (or the FB for Hooma or Fells).




    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/23387058/report-patriots-leaning-towards-activating-rob-gronkowski-from-pup

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    Where did you hear that? I'm looking around and haven't seen it yet


    I swear by lil 10 pound bearded baby Jesus

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    I saw a one loine report that he was put on PUP. Your arcticle is dated last April!

     

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    I was under the impression that Ballard has looked pretty bad and was probably going to be cut.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from TrueChamp. Show TrueChamp's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    Seems like the opposite to me.

        







    "Defense Wins Championships"
     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    I saw a one loine report that he was put on PUP. Your arcticle is dated last April!

     



    Can you post please. I'd be interesting in seeing where it came from

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Low-FB-IQ. Show Low-FB-IQ's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    Sorry that was an old post

     
  9. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    It was a one liner across screen. SO I cannot confirm and I do not see it eslewhere either.

     

     
  10. You have chosen to ignore posts from Quagmire3. Show Quagmire3's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    So Sudfeld, Ballard, Fells and Houman all make it (or the FB for Hooma or Fells).




    you dropped the ball on this thread! 15 yard penalty.

     
  11. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    No offense taken. I have not been able to confirm the one line I saw. So I may have jumped the gun.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from ATJ. Show ATJ's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    Unless I'm mistaken, Gronk was placed on the PUP way back when and can come off when determined to be ready to play until reg season starts then can come off after week 6.  I'd be surprised if they made this move before they absolutely had to.

     
  13. You have chosen to ignore posts from portfolio1. Show portfolio1's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    I still do not see any confirmation. SO sorry... Please ignore this thread.

     

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from Low-FB-IQ. Show Low-FB-IQ's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to ATJ's comment:

    Gronk was placed on the PUP way back when and can come off when determined to be ready to play until reg season starts then can come off after week 6.  I'd be surprised if they made this move before they absolutely had to.



    Yeah that  is what the link to the post I had posted said. That he already was on PUP and that it is just a matter if they activate him or not by the 31st.

     
  15. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to ATJ's comment:

    Unless I'm mistaken, Gronk was placed on the PUP way back when and can come off when determined to be ready to play until reg season starts then can come off after week 6.  I'd be surprised if they made this move before they absolutely had to.



    You are correct they have until the Sat cut down to decide but he needs to either be on the active roster before the deadline or jsut remain on PuP. Actually since he's already on PuP they don't need to do anything extra to keep him there just let the deadline pass. Which is why it would be weird for them to announce it a full day before the deadline considering they are normal closed mouth and they don't have to fill a thing to keep him there

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: GRONK ON PUP

    In response to portfolio1's comment:

    I still do not see any confirmation. SO sorry... Please ignore this thread.



    People make mistakes.  It's no big deal!

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share