In response to russgriswold's comment:
In response to Quagmire3's comment:
I am with Rusty on this one. Rolling Stone has no credibility left. Annonymis I am shocked and surprised you still buy it and/or read it. I swore that rag off after the terrorist was all dolled up and put on the cover. Reading that rag is kind of like taking football advice from Butchise, makes no sense whatsoever!
Thank you. I thought it was a very simple point, but the trolls got insecure when they forgot about how crappy a source RS has become for literally anything.
I cancelled my subscription 15 years ago.
You continue to look like a fool, do you know who wrote the article? His name is Paul Solotaroff. Do some research on the guy and let me know if you still think he is "crappy". Troll!