Hootie and the Blowfish

  1. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Hootie and the Blowfish

    I don't know how you Pats fan feel about it but I thought they were okay...i didn't buy anything of theirs and I wasn't a fan so to speak but I liked what I heard off the big first album and some decent stuff after that...nothing groundbreaking nothing heavy just good pop/rock which was all it was supposed to be.

     

    now our resident know-it-all (three guesses) had some pseudo-intellectual rant about why Hootie was god awful for a hipster like him.

     

    what do u guys think?

     
  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from BostonTrollSpanker. Show BostonTrollSpanker's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    I thought they s*****ed in a pretty incredible way, generic rock and roll for the sunny side up crowd, kind of a segue into retirement living with Jimmy Buffet but that's just me. 

    In seriousness you like what you like. No need to justify it to anyone. Music is even more subjective than the football "hot takes" we get here.

     

     
  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from Not-A-Shot. Show Not-A-Shot's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    Their second album was terrible, but I enjoyed listening to the first one.  I saw them at Great Woods on summer.  It was a booze filled evening and everyone had a great time.

    Come on.  They aren't iconic, but it's not like they're GWAR or Black Eyed Peas.

    They're fine.

     
  4. You have chosen to ignore posts from BabeParilli. Show BabeParilli's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    That one song they keep doing over and over and over, is just okay.

     
  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from soxrockursox. Show soxrockursox's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish


    I have to say the first album was good couldnt tell you anything about them after that.

     
  6. You have chosen to ignore posts from PatsEng. Show PatsEng's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    Hootie came out when I was in middle school, so like every other middle school boy desperately trying to get attention from girls I sadly got that CD and tried to listen to it because they were popular with the ladies. Lets say that CD only stopped collecting dust for a single date picking her up and when it became a make shift frisbee years later in the high school parking lot

     
  7. You have chosen to ignore posts from mrmojo1120. Show mrmojo1120's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    I put Hootie and the Blowfish in the same category as the Black Crowes.Both bands were OK,but nothing special.They had their 15 minutes of fame and I doubt we'll hear too much from either one again.

     

    If the Russian President stepped on a cracker,he'd be Putin on the Ritz.

     
  8. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    Right up there in the pantheon with Duke and the Drivers and the Georgia Satellites.

     
  9. This post has been removed.

     
  10. This post has been removed.

     
  11. This post has been removed.

     
  12. You have chosen to ignore posts from Hammah29r2. Show Hammah29r2's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to Muzwell's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Right up there in the pantheon with Duke and the Drivers and the Georgia Satellites.

    [/QUOTE]
    what about the georgia satelites???? they had one really great hit..........."she said don't give me no lies and keep yer hands to yer self............great tune!

     
  13. This post has been removed.

     
  14. You have chosen to ignore posts from agcsbill. Show agcsbill's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    They do a good golf outing at Myrtle Beach after the Masters.  Does that count?

     
  15. This post has been removed.

     
  16. You have chosen to ignore posts from Muzwell. Show Muzwell's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to Hammah29r2's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to Muzwell's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Right up there in the pantheon with Duke and the Drivers and the Georgia Satellites.

    [/QUOTE]
    what about the georgia satelites???? they had one really great hit..........."she said don't give me no lies and keep yer hands to yer self............great tune!

    [/QUOTE]

    What, did I say something negative about them? I like Duke too, saw 'em about 10 times way the heck back when, good times (I think?). Then, they went away. Lots of bands with a little something going for them, then they're history. None of them consequential, except to some of their fans. 

    If I had to guess, Hootie probably sold as many records as the Satellites, so somebody liked them too.

     
  17. You have chosen to ignore posts from Uncle Rico. Show Uncle Rico's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I am assuming you're kidding here?  The Crowes are WIDELY, WIDELY considered to be the ones carrying the torch of rock and roll, at least in this country, for the last 20 years, at least from that era (1990s).

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I hope you are kidding here, Reach Around Russ.  Last 20 years?  That is Blasphemy!  Black Crows had 2 good songs, ever.  Just 2!  That is all!  One, two! No more then 2!  Last 20 years, you are Loco!

    She talks to Angels

    Twice as Hard

    Those are the only good songs they ever did.

    Wait, they did a good job with Hard to Handle, but that wasn't even their song.

     

     
  18. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to Not-A-Shot's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    Their second album was terrible, but I enjoyed listening to the first one.  I saw them at Great Woods on summer.  It was a booze filled evening and everyone had a great time.

    Come on.  They aren't iconic, but it's not like they're GWAR or Black Eyed Peas.

    They're fine.

    [/QUOTE]

    GWAR is horrendously bad but I dig some of the BEP stuff

     
  19. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to mrmojo1120's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I put Hootie and the Blowfish in the same category as the Black Crowes.Both bands were OK,but nothing special.They had their 15 minutes of fame and I doubt we'll hear too much from either one again.

     

    If the Russian President stepped on a cracker,he'd be Putin on the Ritz.

    [/QUOTE]

    couldn't disagree more with this one and will wonders never cease Rusty nailed it...the Black Crowes had a helluva lot longer run than 15 minutes and have at least 5 songs played regularly on classic rock stations...their music was blues based Stones stuff, lot of open tunings and slide work by the underrated Rich Robinson and his brother did a pretty good Jagger impression...they were legit from late 80's to late 90's and sold a lot of records and concert tickets

    they are in no way remotely to be confused musically and talent wise or relevance wise with a lightweigh one hit wonder like HATB

     
  20. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to soxrockursox's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I have to say the first album was good couldnt tell you anything about them after that.

    [/QUOTE]

    i think u speak for 90% of the population here

     
  21. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to BostonTrollSpanker's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I thought they s*****ed in a pretty incredible way, generic rock and roll for the sunny side up crowd, kind of a segue into retirement living with Jimmy Buffet but that's just me. 

    In seriousness you like what you like. No need to justify it to anyone. Music is even more subjective than the football "hot takes" we get here.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    Exactly. That's what I said about their generic, light pop andd awkard sound and the fact I don't care what people like.  Also, I am not anywhere near a "hipster". Gunty is a tool.

    Gunty is very insecure. He dropped out of Berklee, too.

    [/QUOTE]

    that's true ur not a hipster

    you're a hipster wannabe which is even worse

     
  22. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to Uncle Rico's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]


    I am assuming you're kidding here?  The Crowes are WIDELY, WIDELY considered to be the ones carrying the torch of rock and roll, at least in this country, for the last 20 years, at least from that era (1990s).

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I hope you are kidding here, Reach Around Russ.  Last 20 years?  That is Blasphemy!  Black Crows had 2 good songs, ever.  Just 2!  That is all!  One, two! No more then 2!  Last 20 years, you are Loco!

    She talks to Angels

    Twice as Hard

    Those are the only good songs they ever did.

    Wait, they did a good job with Hard to Handle, but that wasn't even their song.

     

    [/QUOTE]

    very wrong as related above

     
  23. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mrmojo1120's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I put Hootie and the Blowfish in the same category as the Black Crowes.Both bands were OK,but nothing special.They had their 15 minutes of fame and I doubt we'll hear too much from either one again.

     

    If the Russian President stepped on a cracker,he'd be Putin on the Ritz.

    [/QUOTE] 

    I am assuming you're kidding here?  The Crowes are WIDELY, WIDELY considered to be the ones carrying the torch of rock and roll, at least in this country, for the last 20 years, at least from that era (1990s).

    No one could touch them in the mid 1990s. No one, at least live. Many feel they are up there with some of the best rock bands ever. They had argubaly the best debut album of any band of the last 30 years, their second record is top 5 desert isle disc EVER (yep), and their 3rd was supposed to be a double album, and is a classic, quirky gem.

    I am sorry you missed all this genius  in the early/mid 90s. Christ, their B-Sides and unreleased material would make most band from the 1990s BLUSH.

    They are on a very short list with a band like Pearl Jam.  That's really the only competitor in that area as far as songwriting consistency and impact from that era.  PJ just did a better job staying sober. lol

    Drugs and infighting derailed them many times, but they couldn't be followed on stage. They were asked to headline Horde in 1995 by the Allmans, and this was after opening for the Dead, and two months opening for the Stones and Page and Plant in Europe.

    When Page and Plant needed a band worthy enough to open for them in S. America, who did they call? Yep.   Sorry, but Hootie and the Blowfish were busy playing festivals by 1996 and the jig was up.  

    I don't care if you don't like them, but that's one of them most uneducated comments I've ever seen on messageboard anywhere, on any topic.

    After Garcia died and Weir/Lesh started the Furthur Festival in 1996, a band outside the Dead family headlined it that summer. What band? The Crowes.  Sorry, but you don't get to be in those positions if you are some average band.  

    Page personally picked them to be his backing band for his solo Page thing playing Zeppelin and Crowes songs in 2000.  The tour was widely seen as a massive success.

    I'd also put their 1992-1997 run up against any bandd's peak era in terms of songwriting and musicanship/live show combo.  They're incroporated everything a person would like from the 1960s and 1970s and wrapped it up into a big ball of genius.

    I could go on and on.  

    Lastly, I'd put their best lead player, Marc Ford up against any lead player of his generation whether it be Warren Haynes, Craig Ross, Slash, Trey Anastasio, MIkey HOuser, etc.

    No lie. Incredible lead player. A genius who changed their sound after their first album.

    Rich Robinson plays a good Keith Richards too.

    Hootie = The Black Crowes

    My god.  Sorry, bro, but that is just not going to fly. That's like saying The Bay City Rollers are the Rolling Stones.  

    Watch this and then tell me you feel the same way. And, this is just a jam that leads into a song:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjLVxQeH5Og

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I'd also put their 1992-1997 run up against any bandd's peak era in terms of songwriting and musicanship/live show combo.

    now as you are wont to do ur taking a legitimate point and overstating it ridiculously...how can u say this with a straight face?

     
  24. This post has been removed.

     
  25. You have chosen to ignore posts from 42AND46. Show 42AND46's posts

    Re: Hootie and the Blowfish

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to 42AND46's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to DeadAhead2's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    In response to mrmojo1120's comment:
    [QUOTE]

    I put Hootie and the Blowfish in the same category as the Black Crowes.Both bands were OK,but nothing special.They had their 15 minutes of fame and I doubt we'll hear too much from either one again.

     

    If the Russian President stepped on a cracker,he'd be Putin on the Ritz.

    [/QUOTE] 

    I am assuming you're kidding here?  The Crowes are WIDELY, WIDELY considered to be the ones carrying the torch of rock and roll, at least in this country, for the last 20 years, at least from that era (1990s).

    No one could touch them in the mid 1990s. No one, at least live. Many feel they are up there with some of the best rock bands ever. They had argubaly the best debut album of any band of the last 30 years, their second record is top 5 desert isle disc EVER (yep), and their 3rd was supposed to be a double album, and is a classic, quirky gem.

    I am sorry you missed all this genius  in the early/mid 90s. Christ, their B-Sides and unreleased material would make most band from the 1990s BLUSH.

    They are on a very short list with a band like Pearl Jam.  That's really the only competitor in that area as far as songwriting consistency and impact from that era.  PJ just did a better job staying sober. lol

    Drugs and infighting derailed them many times, but they couldn't be followed on stage. They were asked to headline Horde in 1995 by the Allmans, and this was after opening for the Dead, and two months opening for the Stones and Page and Plant in Europe.

    When Page and Plant needed a band worthy enough to open for them in S. America, who did they call? Yep.   Sorry, but Hootie and the Blowfish were busy playing festivals by 1996 and the jig was up.  

    I don't care if you don't like them, but that's one of them most uneducated comments I've ever seen on messageboard anywhere, on any topic.

    After Garcia died and Weir/Lesh started the Furthur Festival in 1996, a band outside the Dead family headlined it that summer. What band? The Crowes.  Sorry, but you don't get to be in those positions if you are some average band.  

    Page personally picked them to be his backing band for his solo Page thing playing Zeppelin and Crowes songs in 2000.  The tour was widely seen as a massive success.

    I'd also put their 1992-1997 run up against any bandd's peak era in terms of songwriting and musicanship/live show combo.  They're incroporated everything a person would like from the 1960s and 1970s and wrapped it up into a big ball of genius.

    I could go on and on.  

    Lastly, I'd put their best lead player, Marc Ford up against any lead player of his generation whether it be Warren Haynes, Craig Ross, Slash, Trey Anastasio, MIkey HOuser, etc.

    No lie. Incredible lead player. A genius who changed their sound after their first album.

    Rich Robinson plays a good Keith Richards too.

    Hootie = The Black Crowes

    My god.  Sorry, bro, but that is just not going to fly. That's like saying The Bay City Rollers are the Rolling Stones.  

    Watch this and then tell me you feel the same way. And, this is just a jam that leads into a song:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjLVxQeH5Og

     

    [/QUOTE]

    I'd also put their 1992-1997 run up against any bandd's peak era in terms of songwriting and musicanship/live show combo.

    now as you are wont to do ur taking a legitimate point and overstating it ridiculously...how can u say this with a straight face?

    [/QUOTE]

    Well, many people feel that way.  Like I said, they left so much material on the floor, it would make even the most popular bands as their peers, blush.

    Many equated "Tall" or what that was going to be in 1994, as a double album (ending up being a single album Amorica), as good as Exile on Main St by the Stones.  I can't argue with it.  The quality of what they left off is as strong as anything the Stones had on Exile. It may be harder or darker material, but the quality cannot be denied.

    Some of it was put out a Lost Crowes in 2006 with a completey unreleased record that was supposed to be released in 1997, which wasn't, yet again due to record label issues, infighting and drug problems.

    I am not saying it's quite Stones, Who or Zeppelin, but from a live band level and musicianship level, absolutely. No question about it.  Page never would have attached hsi wagon to people he didn't think could cut it.

    Pearl Jam I would also put into that discussion. Yes.

    Most great bands or artists have a 6-7 year peak window. Yes. You might get a few gems for songs here and there on albums after that peak era, but to continue it on, it just doesn't occur.

     

    Zeppelin - '69-'75

    The Who - '69-'75

    Stones - '68-74

    Dead - '70-77

    These are bands, whether you like one more than the other or not, are considered all time iconic bands both in the studio and live.

     

    You get the idea. 

    [/QUOTE]

    I get the idea but in no way shape or form will i put the Crowes with the bands above

    I respected and liked them and i agree with the ridiculousness of the Hootie comparison but they were limited to a format and one they copied to begin with...and while their musicianship was very good for what they did it wasn't gonna keep up with the other bands above for the demands their music made, especially the Who and Zep. It was good blues rock but well trod territory and having seen them live they were good, fun but nothing that was going to leave any great impression or be blown away by.

    Andn when we are talking the record/live peaks i would put many ahead of them based on the above

     
Sections
Shortcuts

Share