Re: I found it interesting
posted at 12/12/2012 9:49 AM EST
In response to RockScully's comment:
I love how even after that blistering by NE with the entire world raving about NE undressed Houston, RKarp is still claiming that somehow Houston is better.
I WARNED over and over that Houston does not match up well with NE. Houston had problems with Detroit and Jax for crying out loud.
It was a mystery why this was ignored by the media heading into this game other than the idea that the media just couldn't wait to crown anyone else other than BB's Pats, simply to not have to praise BB again.
It's quite comical to watch, actually.
" but Houston has more talent than they showed last night."
am I claiming that Houston is better? Or am I claiming that Houston has more talent than they showed against the Pats?
I thought that Houston was ill prepared, intimidated and did not make any adjustments. The game was over at half time, even though the deficit was only 21 points.
I have seen Schaub play a lot better, and the Texans Oline and Dline are capapble of better games.
I stand by my comment, talent wise, the 2 teams are more evenly matched than the score of the game.(although I giove the edge to the Pats because of Brady) I stand by my comment that BB outcoached, out prepared and adjusted in game more than Kubiak...
You are also VERY well aware that any time you "warn" or "warnings were out", that I stop reading anything you have to say, so I must have missed that one