1. You have chosen to ignore posts from csylvia79. Show csylvia79's posts

    I thought SF was number 1?

    posted at 9/23/2012 7:10 PM EDT

    Just saying I don't want ESPN to declare my team #1, it seems to cause that team to lose...

     

  2. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: I thought SF was number 1?

    posted at 9/23/2012 7:12 PM EDT

    they were, now houston is (to me; from #2 last week).

     

  3. You have chosen to ignore posts from csylvia79. Show csylvia79's posts

    Re: I thought SF was number 1?

    posted at 9/23/2012 8:14 PM EDT

    In response to bredbru's comment:

    they were, now houston is (to me; from #2 last week).

     




     I agree with a sick four man front they are a tough tough D. They showed most sets they had 5 man on the line and running back support and they couldn't handle them.

     

     

  4. This post has been removed.

     

  5. You have chosen to ignore posts from bredbru. Show bredbru's posts

    Re: I thought SF was number 1?

    posted at 9/23/2012 8:29 PM EDT

    In response to JintsFan's comment:

     

    In response to csylvia79's comment:

    In response to bredbru's comment:

    they were, now houston is (to me; from #2 last week).

     




     I agree with a sick four man front they are a tough tough D. They showed most sets they had 5 man on the line and running back support and they couldn't handle them.

     

     




    well they werent going 16-0 and they are still formidable...power rankings are fun but meaningless before week 5 or 6 to see what teams really are

     



    POWER RANKINGS change week to week. its the nature of teh beast. teams will be better anbd worse week to week. by the way giants are way up.

     

  6. This post has been removed.