is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
-
is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 4:16 AM EDT
its strange to have so many older and injury prone guys take up so many roster spots at one position!!! that said i think fred taylor is going to be the man this year -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 7:49 AM EDT
The Pats will probably carry 4 RBs this year. BJGE will be cut or traded. The Pats will probably use that roster spot at LB -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 7:52 AM EDT
when 4 get injured every season, i would say not. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 8:05 AM EDT
Probably will have one on the practice squad in reserve for the usual injury to Morris and Maroney that knock them out half way through the season. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 10:05 AM EDT
Four is not a bad number with multiple offensive schemes as long as it's the right four....Still a bit perplexed about the no new blood at RB given all those picks....Hmm -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 10:15 AM EDT
when you consider that more often than not BJGE and Morris are in the FB position, there are 3 HBs (LM, FT, KF) and 2 FBs (BJGE, SM) not unusual at all. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 10:43 AM EDT
Most teams carry 4 RB on the 53 man roster. I was hoping we would have drafted a big back like Gerhart, Tate or Hardesty allowing us to cut both Morris and Taylor but that didn't happen. There is no way we cut BJGE. He is too inexpensive. If anyone gets cut it will be Taylor and his $2MM salary. Morris costs only $900K and is a year younger.
Given the injury prone situation with Morris and Taylor (Maroney too, although he stayed relatively healthy last year), I think the Pats carry all 5 backs to start the season. It won't take long for one of them to get hurt and go out on injury reserve.
We signed an undrafted rookie free agent. I look for him to make the practice squad and he's there if we need him. To make room for the 5 RBs, I think we go with 5 WRs (Moss, Edelman, Tate, Holt and Price) instead of 6. Welker starts on PUP. Patten, Aiken and maybe even Slater get cut. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 10:54 AM EDT
Aiken was a ST Captain, no way he is cut... -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 11:08 AM EDT
i was just about to say the same dat dey aint gon cut Aiken!
We need all the RB's we need lol:P but i want FT to step up to the plate and EAT up LB's! Maroney needs to stop fumbling or he is gonna be benched! and dont cut bjge he is really good! he is waay better than maroney who dances behind his o-line -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 11:42 AM EDT
In Response to Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?:Aiken was a ST Captain, no way he is cut...
Posted by titletownfan
Yes way! Aiken is a one dimensional player. He's terrible as a WR. We since have signed Marques Murrell and drafted Devin McCourty. McCourty is an excellent gunner and adds to the defense while Aiken can only play special teams. By signing Holt and drafting Price plus with a healthy Brandon Tate, we don't need another WR/ST expensive player like Aiken who makes close to $1 MM to cover kicks. I said the same thing about Kelly Washington before last season and everyone called me crazy but I was right about that and I will be right about this.
We have 5 guys who I think we carry as WRs in Moss, Edelman, Tate (another special teams guy), Price and Holt. You got to look at the numbers. Either Aiken goes or we cut a RB or OL type. There just isn't room for Aiken the way I see it.
If you didn't like my Aiken prediction, you're going to hate this; I think Ron Brace could be cut. I know, he was a high pick but he was drafted as a hedge to Wilfork holding out. Now that Wilfork is signed long term, we don't need Brace. I thought he was a mistake when we took him and he appears to be a bust. I think Slater needs to be cut too now that we have McCourty to return kicks. I don't think we'll cut a DB because 9 is just about right. That means we cut either Ninkovich or Murrell.
So, if you want to keep Aiken, who do you cut on offense? If 1-2 guys get hurt during training camp and start on PUP, then there could be room for Aiken for awhile. But, if that happens, I'd rather give Brace another year. Here's my depth chart and we still have one player too many on defense.OFFENSE 25 Players Slot 24 Julian Edelman Tory Holt PUP 29 W Welker WR #90 T Price 22 Brandon Tate LOT 32 Matt Light 26 S Vollmer 24 George Bussey LG 28 Logan Mankins 28 Dan Connolly C 30 Dan Koppen ROG 34 Stephen Neal 24 Rich Ohrnberger RT 31 Nick Kaczur 28 Mark LeVoir TE #42 R Gronkowski #113 A Hernandez 32 Alge Crumpler QB 33 Tom Brady 24 Brian Hoyer RB 25 L Maroney 34 Kevin Faulk 34 Fred Taylor 33 Sammy Morris 25 BJ Green-Ellis WR 33 Randy Moss DEFENSE 26 Players DE 29 Ty Warren 24 Myron Pryor NT 28 Vince Wilfork 28 Mike Wright DE Gerrard Warren 32 Damione Lewis OLB 30 Tully Banta-Cain 28 Pierre Woods 26 Rob Ninkovich ILB 24 Jerod Mayo 24 T McKenzie 25 Marques Murrell ILB #62 B Spikes 24 Gary Guyton OLB #53 J Cunningham 25 Shawn Crable LCB #27 D McCourty 26 J Wilhite RCB 29 Leigh Bodden 24 Darius Butler 25 T Wheatley SS 26 B Meriweather 23 Pat Chung FS 26 James Sanders 26 B McGowan SPECIAL TEAMS 3 Players Possible Cuts PK 26 S Gostkowski 35 Shawn Springs P #150 Z. Mesko 36 David Patton H 23 Ron Brace LS 24 Jake Ingram 24 Ryan Wendell KR #27 D McCourty 28 Eric Alexander PR #27 D McCourty 24 Matthew Slater 29 Sam Aiken -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/8/2010 12:59 PM EDT
In Response to is 5 running backs an unusually high number?:its strange to have so many older and injury prone guys take up so many roster spots at one position!!! that said i think fred taylor is going to be the man this year
Posted by sirpinochle
I believe so. However, most of their RBs can only play for part of the season(s). Is it time to spend that #1 pick on a(nother) premium RB?
Personally, I just want to see a productive/healthy RB ready for the play-offs. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/9/2010 11:28 AM EDT
yeah, i'm sure it will be cut down to four -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/9/2010 11:33 AM EDT
No, if we lack a feature rb and the ones on the roster get injured a lot. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/9/2010 1:44 PM EDT
I wouldnt cut Law firm. He is a decent back with a good potential as a blocker. He cleared the way for atleast two Maroney TDs, if I'm not mistaken. Also we need to get younger, so given the choice, Sammy Morris would be stuck with the short straw, IMHO. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/9/2010 2:44 PM EDT
can we stop suggesting that pat paschall, a small back from a Div 1AA school, is going to bump BJGE, a big back from an SEC school, off the depth chart. lawfirm is a good back with solid size. he is a little brick with the ability to power it up between the tackles.green-ellis is also versatile enough to line up at FB and clear the way for the guy behind him. he is quite a find in rookie free agency and i expect him to stick around as he has more priority that pat paschall as it will be his 3rd season in 2010. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/9/2010 3:38 PM EDT
Id say Sammy gets the boot, although for the $$ Id rather see Taylor go. In my dream Patriot world, the Pats would trade their (not OAK's) 2011 1rst Rd. pick for Titans holdout Chris Johnson. Unfortunately, the amount of money it would take to sign him to the deal he expects and resign Brady/Moss makes it highly unlikely. Can you imaging what the passing game could do with a homerun threat like him standing behind Brady?!!! Opposing defenses would have to pick their poison! Go Pats! -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/10/2010 5:20 AM EDT
Do to their age I think one will be out injured before the end of preseason so the PATS will only have 4 at most by the time the regular season starts and thats about a normal number of RB's. -
Re: is 5 running backs an unusually high number?
posted at 5/10/2010 8:33 AM EDT
The RB position got better just by the addition of Crumpler and I can't imagine they would have the injury issues they had last year. If they do, well, it's a chance you take at all positions. I too would love Chris Johnson or a CJ style RB. Don't see that happening though until next seasons draft or free agency.
I like the RB's we have right now and expect BJGE to be released as well if Paschall(sp) is nearly as good as he might be. BJGE has leveled off and actually gotten slower in my opinion.