In response to Bunker Spreckels' comment:
You do realize if you don't drop back an obscene 58 times, dude. 58.....This means the odds for your OL to make a mistake or not be 100% perfect, go up..right?
Nate Solder is to blame because on 58 drop backs in a shotgun he wasn't 100% perfect? Make sense much?
You get this concept, right? It's called the odds. No team since 2007 has put more pressure on their O LIne than this team. No team.
End of story.
RUN THE BALL AND PUT BRADY UNDER CENTER FOR 60% of games from here on out or people like you don't get to say jack squat. The ignorance is unparelled in any fanbase in sports right now, on ANY topic.
Only a portion of a fanbase madly in love with Tom Brady would see their team run amuck for 200 yards in 2 straight weeks and then not see why it's not's relevant to establish a run against a good D on the road in the toughest place in the NFL to play.
GOOD EFFING GRIEF
Read a book. My god almighty.
This entire post is a perfect example of why nobody on this board takes you seriously. It has absolutely nothing to do with the post you are "responding" to. It is a fact that Solder got beat on the pivotal sack of Brady near the end of the Seattle game. All you do in response is attack straw men and regurgitate the same tired "points" you have been spamming this board with since I started posting here. Nothing you posted refutes the content of my post because it has nothing to do with what I posted and in typical fashion you choose to end your "response" by insulting my intelligence. Have you noticed that nobody on this board (including guys like TrueChamp and wozzy) agree with your insane agenda of bashing our QB repeatedly? Take a hint and chill the f out.